The role of knowledge transfer in health policymaking: The US experience

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

As Ellen et al. point out, there is room for improvement in knowledge transfer between academic research and policymaking. At the same time, retrospective analyses of health policy often identify research influences on policymaking. Part of this paradox can be explained by the difference between the nature of research and the nature of policymaking. Research necessarily focuses on the past, examining changes that have already taken place. Policymakers want to understand how policy will shape the future. A key element of successful knowledge transfer is the use of mechanisms that allow past research to be used to forecast future policy consequences. One such mechanism is the formal microsimulation model, which translates research-based parameters into out-of-sample forecasts. A more straightforward mechanism is the embedded researcher, who extrapolates from a body of research knowledge to make a policy forecast. These types of mechanisms can supplement formal processes of knowledge transfer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number31
JournalIsrael Journal of Health Policy Research
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 29 2016

Fingerprint

Health
Research
Health Policy
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The role of knowledge transfer in health policymaking : The US experience. / Glied, Sharon.

In: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, 31, 29.06.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{53b90d4b2e34458bae8d457f7b7d6d0b,
title = "The role of knowledge transfer in health policymaking: The US experience",
abstract = "As Ellen et al. point out, there is room for improvement in knowledge transfer between academic research and policymaking. At the same time, retrospective analyses of health policy often identify research influences on policymaking. Part of this paradox can be explained by the difference between the nature of research and the nature of policymaking. Research necessarily focuses on the past, examining changes that have already taken place. Policymakers want to understand how policy will shape the future. A key element of successful knowledge transfer is the use of mechanisms that allow past research to be used to forecast future policy consequences. One such mechanism is the formal microsimulation model, which translates research-based parameters into out-of-sample forecasts. A more straightforward mechanism is the embedded researcher, who extrapolates from a body of research knowledge to make a policy forecast. These types of mechanisms can supplement formal processes of knowledge transfer.",
author = "Sharon Glied",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/s13584-016-0091-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Israel Journal of Health Policy Research",
issn = "2045-4015",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of knowledge transfer in health policymaking

T2 - The US experience

AU - Glied, Sharon

PY - 2016/6/29

Y1 - 2016/6/29

N2 - As Ellen et al. point out, there is room for improvement in knowledge transfer between academic research and policymaking. At the same time, retrospective analyses of health policy often identify research influences on policymaking. Part of this paradox can be explained by the difference between the nature of research and the nature of policymaking. Research necessarily focuses on the past, examining changes that have already taken place. Policymakers want to understand how policy will shape the future. A key element of successful knowledge transfer is the use of mechanisms that allow past research to be used to forecast future policy consequences. One such mechanism is the formal microsimulation model, which translates research-based parameters into out-of-sample forecasts. A more straightforward mechanism is the embedded researcher, who extrapolates from a body of research knowledge to make a policy forecast. These types of mechanisms can supplement formal processes of knowledge transfer.

AB - As Ellen et al. point out, there is room for improvement in knowledge transfer between academic research and policymaking. At the same time, retrospective analyses of health policy often identify research influences on policymaking. Part of this paradox can be explained by the difference between the nature of research and the nature of policymaking. Research necessarily focuses on the past, examining changes that have already taken place. Policymakers want to understand how policy will shape the future. A key element of successful knowledge transfer is the use of mechanisms that allow past research to be used to forecast future policy consequences. One such mechanism is the formal microsimulation model, which translates research-based parameters into out-of-sample forecasts. A more straightforward mechanism is the embedded researcher, who extrapolates from a body of research knowledge to make a policy forecast. These types of mechanisms can supplement formal processes of knowledge transfer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976468651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976468651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13584-016-0091-6

DO - 10.1186/s13584-016-0091-6

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 5

JO - Israel Journal of Health Policy Research

JF - Israel Journal of Health Policy Research

SN - 2045-4015

IS - 1

M1 - 31

ER -