The robustness of eye–mouth index as an eye-tracking metric of social attention in toddlers

Nicholas E. Souter, Sudha Arunachalam, Rhiannon J. Luyster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Eye-tracking research on social attention in infants and toddlers has included heterogeneous stimuli and analysis techniques. This allows measurement of looking to inner facial features under diverse conditions but restricts across-study comparisons. Eye–mouth index (EMI) is a measure of relative preference for looking to the eyes or mouth, independent of time spent attending to the face. The current study assessed whether EMI was more robust to differences in stimulus type than percent dwell time (PDT) toward the eyes, mouth, and face. Participants were typically developing toddlers aged 18–30 months (N = 58). Stimuli were dynamic videos with single and multiple actors. It was hypothesized that stimulus type would affect PDT to the face, eyes, and mouth, but not EMI. Generalized estimating equations demonstrated that all measures including EMI were influenced by stimulus type. Nevertheless, planned contrasts suggested that EMI was more robust than PDT when comparing heterogeneous stimuli. EMI may allow for a more robust comparison of social attention to inner facial features across eye-tracking studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Development
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

stimulus
Mouth
infant
video
Research
time

Keywords

  • EMI
  • Eye-tracking
  • eye–mouth index
  • social attention
  • stimuli
  • stimulus
  • toddlers
  • typically developing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

The robustness of eye–mouth index as an eye-tracking metric of social attention in toddlers. / Souter, Nicholas E.; Arunachalam, Sudha; Luyster, Rhiannon J.

In: International Journal of Behavioral Development, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbf926e52b1944a1a3b765b4e0fe8e8d,
title = "The robustness of eye–mouth index as an eye-tracking metric of social attention in toddlers",
abstract = "Eye-tracking research on social attention in infants and toddlers has included heterogeneous stimuli and analysis techniques. This allows measurement of looking to inner facial features under diverse conditions but restricts across-study comparisons. Eye–mouth index (EMI) is a measure of relative preference for looking to the eyes or mouth, independent of time spent attending to the face. The current study assessed whether EMI was more robust to differences in stimulus type than percent dwell time (PDT) toward the eyes, mouth, and face. Participants were typically developing toddlers aged 18–30 months (N = 58). Stimuli were dynamic videos with single and multiple actors. It was hypothesized that stimulus type would affect PDT to the face, eyes, and mouth, but not EMI. Generalized estimating equations demonstrated that all measures including EMI were influenced by stimulus type. Nevertheless, planned contrasts suggested that EMI was more robust than PDT when comparing heterogeneous stimuli. EMI may allow for a more robust comparison of social attention to inner facial features across eye-tracking studies.",
keywords = "EMI, Eye-tracking, eye–mouth index, social attention, stimuli, stimulus, toddlers, typically developing",
author = "Souter, {Nicholas E.} and Sudha Arunachalam and Luyster, {Rhiannon J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0165025419885186",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Development",
issn = "0165-0254",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The robustness of eye–mouth index as an eye-tracking metric of social attention in toddlers

AU - Souter, Nicholas E.

AU - Arunachalam, Sudha

AU - Luyster, Rhiannon J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Eye-tracking research on social attention in infants and toddlers has included heterogeneous stimuli and analysis techniques. This allows measurement of looking to inner facial features under diverse conditions but restricts across-study comparisons. Eye–mouth index (EMI) is a measure of relative preference for looking to the eyes or mouth, independent of time spent attending to the face. The current study assessed whether EMI was more robust to differences in stimulus type than percent dwell time (PDT) toward the eyes, mouth, and face. Participants were typically developing toddlers aged 18–30 months (N = 58). Stimuli were dynamic videos with single and multiple actors. It was hypothesized that stimulus type would affect PDT to the face, eyes, and mouth, but not EMI. Generalized estimating equations demonstrated that all measures including EMI were influenced by stimulus type. Nevertheless, planned contrasts suggested that EMI was more robust than PDT when comparing heterogeneous stimuli. EMI may allow for a more robust comparison of social attention to inner facial features across eye-tracking studies.

AB - Eye-tracking research on social attention in infants and toddlers has included heterogeneous stimuli and analysis techniques. This allows measurement of looking to inner facial features under diverse conditions but restricts across-study comparisons. Eye–mouth index (EMI) is a measure of relative preference for looking to the eyes or mouth, independent of time spent attending to the face. The current study assessed whether EMI was more robust to differences in stimulus type than percent dwell time (PDT) toward the eyes, mouth, and face. Participants were typically developing toddlers aged 18–30 months (N = 58). Stimuli were dynamic videos with single and multiple actors. It was hypothesized that stimulus type would affect PDT to the face, eyes, and mouth, but not EMI. Generalized estimating equations demonstrated that all measures including EMI were influenced by stimulus type. Nevertheless, planned contrasts suggested that EMI was more robust than PDT when comparing heterogeneous stimuli. EMI may allow for a more robust comparison of social attention to inner facial features across eye-tracking studies.

KW - EMI

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - eye–mouth index

KW - social attention

KW - stimuli

KW - stimulus

KW - toddlers

KW - typically developing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074720109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074720109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0165025419885186

DO - 10.1177/0165025419885186

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074720109

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Development

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Development

SN - 0165-0254

ER -