The Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Life Satisfaction Changes Depending on Stigmatized Status

Mark J. Brandt, Pj Henry, Geoffrey Wetherell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Members of stigmatized social groups are typically more authoritarian than their nonstigmatized or higher status counterparts. We draw on research demonstrating that authoritarianism compensates for the negative effects of stigma to predict that this endorsement will be more psychologically beneficial (and less harmful) for the stigmatized compared to their high-status counterparts. Consistent with this idea, data from the 2008 (N = 2,322) and 2012 (N = 5,916) American National Election Study indicate that for members of stigmatized social groups (low income, low education, and ethnic minority), authoritarian child rearing values have more positive psychological effects than for members of high-status groups. These results were robust to covariates, including demographics, religiosity, political ideology, and cognitive style.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)219-228
    Number of pages10
    JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
    Volume6
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    Authoritarianism
    Child Rearing
    Demography
    Psychology
    Education
    Research

    Keywords

    • political psychology
    • self-worth
    • social status
    • stigma
    • well-being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Clinical Psychology

    Cite this

    The Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Life Satisfaction Changes Depending on Stigmatized Status. / Brandt, Mark J.; Henry, Pj; Wetherell, Geoffrey.

    In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 219-228.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{e903dd286c0a478db38ceeb725a9b1cc,
    title = "The Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Life Satisfaction Changes Depending on Stigmatized Status",
    abstract = "Members of stigmatized social groups are typically more authoritarian than their nonstigmatized or higher status counterparts. We draw on research demonstrating that authoritarianism compensates for the negative effects of stigma to predict that this endorsement will be more psychologically beneficial (and less harmful) for the stigmatized compared to their high-status counterparts. Consistent with this idea, data from the 2008 (N = 2,322) and 2012 (N = 5,916) American National Election Study indicate that for members of stigmatized social groups (low income, low education, and ethnic minority), authoritarian child rearing values have more positive psychological effects than for members of high-status groups. These results were robust to covariates, including demographics, religiosity, political ideology, and cognitive style.",
    keywords = "political psychology, self-worth, social status, stigma, well-being",
    author = "Brandt, {Mark J.} and Pj Henry and Geoffrey Wetherell",
    year = "2015",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/1948550614552728",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "6",
    pages = "219--228",
    journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
    issn = "1948-5506",
    publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Life Satisfaction Changes Depending on Stigmatized Status

    AU - Brandt, Mark J.

    AU - Henry, Pj

    AU - Wetherell, Geoffrey

    PY - 2015/1/1

    Y1 - 2015/1/1

    N2 - Members of stigmatized social groups are typically more authoritarian than their nonstigmatized or higher status counterparts. We draw on research demonstrating that authoritarianism compensates for the negative effects of stigma to predict that this endorsement will be more psychologically beneficial (and less harmful) for the stigmatized compared to their high-status counterparts. Consistent with this idea, data from the 2008 (N = 2,322) and 2012 (N = 5,916) American National Election Study indicate that for members of stigmatized social groups (low income, low education, and ethnic minority), authoritarian child rearing values have more positive psychological effects than for members of high-status groups. These results were robust to covariates, including demographics, religiosity, political ideology, and cognitive style.

    AB - Members of stigmatized social groups are typically more authoritarian than their nonstigmatized or higher status counterparts. We draw on research demonstrating that authoritarianism compensates for the negative effects of stigma to predict that this endorsement will be more psychologically beneficial (and less harmful) for the stigmatized compared to their high-status counterparts. Consistent with this idea, data from the 2008 (N = 2,322) and 2012 (N = 5,916) American National Election Study indicate that for members of stigmatized social groups (low income, low education, and ethnic minority), authoritarian child rearing values have more positive psychological effects than for members of high-status groups. These results were robust to covariates, including demographics, religiosity, political ideology, and cognitive style.

    KW - political psychology

    KW - self-worth

    KW - social status

    KW - stigma

    KW - well-being

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922784308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922784308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/1948550614552728

    DO - 10.1177/1948550614552728

    M3 - Article

    VL - 6

    SP - 219

    EP - 228

    JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

    JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

    SN - 1948-5506

    IS - 2

    ER -