The Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Life Satisfaction Changes Depending on Stigmatized Status

Mark J. Brandt, Pj Henry, Geoffrey Wetherell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Members of stigmatized social groups are typically more authoritarian than their nonstigmatized or higher status counterparts. We draw on research demonstrating that authoritarianism compensates for the negative effects of stigma to predict that this endorsement will be more psychologically beneficial (and less harmful) for the stigmatized compared to their high-status counterparts. Consistent with this idea, data from the 2008 (N = 2,322) and 2012 (N = 5,916) American National Election Study indicate that for members of stigmatized social groups (low income, low education, and ethnic minority), authoritarian child rearing values have more positive psychological effects than for members of high-status groups. These results were robust to covariates, including demographics, religiosity, political ideology, and cognitive style.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-228
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Authoritarianism
Child Rearing
Demography
Psychology
Education
Research

Keywords

  • political psychology
  • self-worth
  • social status
  • stigma
  • well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

The Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Life Satisfaction Changes Depending on Stigmatized Status. / Brandt, Mark J.; Henry, Pj; Wetherell, Geoffrey.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 219-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e903dd286c0a478db38ceeb725a9b1cc,
title = "The Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Life Satisfaction Changes Depending on Stigmatized Status",
abstract = "Members of stigmatized social groups are typically more authoritarian than their nonstigmatized or higher status counterparts. We draw on research demonstrating that authoritarianism compensates for the negative effects of stigma to predict that this endorsement will be more psychologically beneficial (and less harmful) for the stigmatized compared to their high-status counterparts. Consistent with this idea, data from the 2008 (N = 2,322) and 2012 (N = 5,916) American National Election Study indicate that for members of stigmatized social groups (low income, low education, and ethnic minority), authoritarian child rearing values have more positive psychological effects than for members of high-status groups. These results were robust to covariates, including demographics, religiosity, political ideology, and cognitive style.",
keywords = "political psychology, self-worth, social status, stigma, well-being",
author = "Brandt, {Mark J.} and Pj Henry and Geoffrey Wetherell",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1948550614552728",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "219--228",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Relationship Between Authoritarianism and Life Satisfaction Changes Depending on Stigmatized Status

AU - Brandt, Mark J.

AU - Henry, Pj

AU - Wetherell, Geoffrey

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Members of stigmatized social groups are typically more authoritarian than their nonstigmatized or higher status counterparts. We draw on research demonstrating that authoritarianism compensates for the negative effects of stigma to predict that this endorsement will be more psychologically beneficial (and less harmful) for the stigmatized compared to their high-status counterparts. Consistent with this idea, data from the 2008 (N = 2,322) and 2012 (N = 5,916) American National Election Study indicate that for members of stigmatized social groups (low income, low education, and ethnic minority), authoritarian child rearing values have more positive psychological effects than for members of high-status groups. These results were robust to covariates, including demographics, religiosity, political ideology, and cognitive style.

AB - Members of stigmatized social groups are typically more authoritarian than their nonstigmatized or higher status counterparts. We draw on research demonstrating that authoritarianism compensates for the negative effects of stigma to predict that this endorsement will be more psychologically beneficial (and less harmful) for the stigmatized compared to their high-status counterparts. Consistent with this idea, data from the 2008 (N = 2,322) and 2012 (N = 5,916) American National Election Study indicate that for members of stigmatized social groups (low income, low education, and ethnic minority), authoritarian child rearing values have more positive psychological effects than for members of high-status groups. These results were robust to covariates, including demographics, religiosity, political ideology, and cognitive style.

KW - political psychology

KW - self-worth

KW - social status

KW - stigma

KW - well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922784308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922784308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1948550614552728

DO - 10.1177/1948550614552728

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922784308

VL - 6

SP - 219

EP - 228

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

IS - 2

ER -