The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology

John Jost, Orsolya Hunyady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this chapter, we trace the historical and intellectual origins of system justification theory, summarise the basic assumptions of the theory, and derive 18 specific hypotheses from a system justification perspective. We review and integrate empirical evidence addressing these hypotheses concerning the rationalisation of the status quo, the internalisation of inequality (outgroup favouritism and depressed entitlement), relations among ego, group, and system justification motives (including consequences for attitudinal ambivalence, self-esteem, and psychological well-being), and the reduction of ideological dissonance. Turning to the question of why people would engage in system justification--especially when it conflicts with other interests and motives--we propose that system-justifying ideologies serve a palliative function in that they reduce anxiety, guilt, dissonance, discomfort, and uncertainty for those who are advantaged and disadvantaged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-153
Number of pages43
JournalEuropean Review of Social Psychology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Guilt
Ego
Vulnerable Populations
Self Concept
Uncertainty
Anxiety
Psychology
Rationalization
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. / Jost, John; Hunyady, Orsolya.

In: European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 111-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f850a3e1d2b24b6499f7717d2e15d4a7,
title = "The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology",
abstract = "In this chapter, we trace the historical and intellectual origins of system justification theory, summarise the basic assumptions of the theory, and derive 18 specific hypotheses from a system justification perspective. We review and integrate empirical evidence addressing these hypotheses concerning the rationalisation of the status quo, the internalisation of inequality (outgroup favouritism and depressed entitlement), relations among ego, group, and system justification motives (including consequences for attitudinal ambivalence, self-esteem, and psychological well-being), and the reduction of ideological dissonance. Turning to the question of why people would engage in system justification--especially when it conflicts with other interests and motives--we propose that system-justifying ideologies serve a palliative function in that they reduce anxiety, guilt, dissonance, discomfort, and uncertainty for those who are advantaged and disadvantaged.",
author = "John Jost and Orsolya Hunyady",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10463280240000046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "111--153",
journal = "European Review of Social Psychology",
issn = "1046-3283",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology

AU - Jost, John

AU - Hunyady, Orsolya

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - In this chapter, we trace the historical and intellectual origins of system justification theory, summarise the basic assumptions of the theory, and derive 18 specific hypotheses from a system justification perspective. We review and integrate empirical evidence addressing these hypotheses concerning the rationalisation of the status quo, the internalisation of inequality (outgroup favouritism and depressed entitlement), relations among ego, group, and system justification motives (including consequences for attitudinal ambivalence, self-esteem, and psychological well-being), and the reduction of ideological dissonance. Turning to the question of why people would engage in system justification--especially when it conflicts with other interests and motives--we propose that system-justifying ideologies serve a palliative function in that they reduce anxiety, guilt, dissonance, discomfort, and uncertainty for those who are advantaged and disadvantaged.

AB - In this chapter, we trace the historical and intellectual origins of system justification theory, summarise the basic assumptions of the theory, and derive 18 specific hypotheses from a system justification perspective. We review and integrate empirical evidence addressing these hypotheses concerning the rationalisation of the status quo, the internalisation of inequality (outgroup favouritism and depressed entitlement), relations among ego, group, and system justification motives (including consequences for attitudinal ambivalence, self-esteem, and psychological well-being), and the reduction of ideological dissonance. Turning to the question of why people would engage in system justification--especially when it conflicts with other interests and motives--we propose that system-justifying ideologies serve a palliative function in that they reduce anxiety, guilt, dissonance, discomfort, and uncertainty for those who are advantaged and disadvantaged.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052792898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052792898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10463280240000046

DO - 10.1080/10463280240000046

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 111

EP - 153

JO - European Review of Social Psychology

JF - European Review of Social Psychology

SN - 1046-3283

IS - 1

ER -