The psychology of social justice in political thought and action

Tobias Rothmund, Julia C. Becker, John Jost

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Psychological research at the intersection of social justice and political behavior is part of the vibrant, growing field of political psychology. The present chapter addresses this research and focuses especially on justice-related thoughts, feelings, and actions of political laypersons. We highlight three lines of research that link laypersons’ evaluations of distributive and procedural injustice with political attitudes and behavior. First, political science and psychology provide evidence that beliefs about social justice reflect key elements in political ideologies. For example, conservatives (a) are less likely to prioritize issues of fairness and social justice when making moral judgments, (b) are more likely to evaluate distributive justice in terms of principles of merit than equality, and (c) more readily interpret requests for public support on behalf of disadvantaged groups as undeserved, in comparison to liberals. These findings are discussed in regard to psychological theories linking political ideology with motivated social cognition. Second, we outline how perceived procedural justice and perceived political legitimacy are related and mutually affect each other. The more political authorities are seen as reigning in line with criteria of procedural justice, the more they are perceived as trustworthy, legitimate, and entitled to lead. Third, we outline how justice perceptions relate to protest intentions and behavior. Whereas perceived social injustice provides a strong motivation to participate in political protest, we also address the question of why people frequently fail to protest against sources of disadvantage and deprivation. In the final part of the chapter, we suggest avenues for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Social Justice Theory and Research
PublisherSpringer New York
Pages275-291
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781493932160
ISBN (Print)9781493932153
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

social justice
psychology
justice
political psychology
protest
layperson
political ideology
political behavior
psychological theory
moral judgement
distributive justice
social cognition
political attitude
public support
deprivation
fairness
political science
equality
legitimacy
present

Keywords

  • Distributive justice
  • Political ideology
  • Political legitimacy
  • Procedural justice
  • Protest behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Rothmund, T., Becker, J. C., & Jost, J. (2016). The psychology of social justice in political thought and action. In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 275-291). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_15

The psychology of social justice in political thought and action. / Rothmund, Tobias; Becker, Julia C.; Jost, John.

Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer New York, 2016. p. 275-291.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Rothmund, T, Becker, JC & Jost, J 2016, The psychology of social justice in political thought and action. in Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer New York, pp. 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_15
Rothmund T, Becker JC, Jost J. The psychology of social justice in political thought and action. In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer New York. 2016. p. 275-291 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_15
Rothmund, Tobias ; Becker, Julia C. ; Jost, John. / The psychology of social justice in political thought and action. Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer New York, 2016. pp. 275-291
@inbook{9e9c44021a3c486d8b0ad2b48d8ba534,
title = "The psychology of social justice in political thought and action",
abstract = "Psychological research at the intersection of social justice and political behavior is part of the vibrant, growing field of political psychology. The present chapter addresses this research and focuses especially on justice-related thoughts, feelings, and actions of political laypersons. We highlight three lines of research that link laypersons’ evaluations of distributive and procedural injustice with political attitudes and behavior. First, political science and psychology provide evidence that beliefs about social justice reflect key elements in political ideologies. For example, conservatives (a) are less likely to prioritize issues of fairness and social justice when making moral judgments, (b) are more likely to evaluate distributive justice in terms of principles of merit than equality, and (c) more readily interpret requests for public support on behalf of disadvantaged groups as undeserved, in comparison to liberals. These findings are discussed in regard to psychological theories linking political ideology with motivated social cognition. Second, we outline how perceived procedural justice and perceived political legitimacy are related and mutually affect each other. The more political authorities are seen as reigning in line with criteria of procedural justice, the more they are perceived as trustworthy, legitimate, and entitled to lead. Third, we outline how justice perceptions relate to protest intentions and behavior. Whereas perceived social injustice provides a strong motivation to participate in political protest, we also address the question of why people frequently fail to protest against sources of disadvantage and deprivation. In the final part of the chapter, we suggest avenues for future research.",
keywords = "Distributive justice, Political ideology, Political legitimacy, Procedural justice, Protest behavior",
author = "Tobias Rothmund and Becker, {Julia C.} and John Jost",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_15",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781493932153",
pages = "275--291",
booktitle = "Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research",
publisher = "Springer New York",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The psychology of social justice in political thought and action

AU - Rothmund, Tobias

AU - Becker, Julia C.

AU - Jost, John

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Psychological research at the intersection of social justice and political behavior is part of the vibrant, growing field of political psychology. The present chapter addresses this research and focuses especially on justice-related thoughts, feelings, and actions of political laypersons. We highlight three lines of research that link laypersons’ evaluations of distributive and procedural injustice with political attitudes and behavior. First, political science and psychology provide evidence that beliefs about social justice reflect key elements in political ideologies. For example, conservatives (a) are less likely to prioritize issues of fairness and social justice when making moral judgments, (b) are more likely to evaluate distributive justice in terms of principles of merit than equality, and (c) more readily interpret requests for public support on behalf of disadvantaged groups as undeserved, in comparison to liberals. These findings are discussed in regard to psychological theories linking political ideology with motivated social cognition. Second, we outline how perceived procedural justice and perceived political legitimacy are related and mutually affect each other. The more political authorities are seen as reigning in line with criteria of procedural justice, the more they are perceived as trustworthy, legitimate, and entitled to lead. Third, we outline how justice perceptions relate to protest intentions and behavior. Whereas perceived social injustice provides a strong motivation to participate in political protest, we also address the question of why people frequently fail to protest against sources of disadvantage and deprivation. In the final part of the chapter, we suggest avenues for future research.

AB - Psychological research at the intersection of social justice and political behavior is part of the vibrant, growing field of political psychology. The present chapter addresses this research and focuses especially on justice-related thoughts, feelings, and actions of political laypersons. We highlight three lines of research that link laypersons’ evaluations of distributive and procedural injustice with political attitudes and behavior. First, political science and psychology provide evidence that beliefs about social justice reflect key elements in political ideologies. For example, conservatives (a) are less likely to prioritize issues of fairness and social justice when making moral judgments, (b) are more likely to evaluate distributive justice in terms of principles of merit than equality, and (c) more readily interpret requests for public support on behalf of disadvantaged groups as undeserved, in comparison to liberals. These findings are discussed in regard to psychological theories linking political ideology with motivated social cognition. Second, we outline how perceived procedural justice and perceived political legitimacy are related and mutually affect each other. The more political authorities are seen as reigning in line with criteria of procedural justice, the more they are perceived as trustworthy, legitimate, and entitled to lead. Third, we outline how justice perceptions relate to protest intentions and behavior. Whereas perceived social injustice provides a strong motivation to participate in political protest, we also address the question of why people frequently fail to protest against sources of disadvantage and deprivation. In the final part of the chapter, we suggest avenues for future research.

KW - Distributive justice

KW - Political ideology

KW - Political legitimacy

KW - Procedural justice

KW - Protest behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006745114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006745114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_15

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_15

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781493932153

SP - 275

EP - 291

BT - Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research

PB - Springer New York

ER -