The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism

Arie W. Kruglanski, Michele J. Gelfand, Jocelyn Belanger, Anna Sheveland, Malkanthi Hetiarachchi, Rohan Gunaratna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We present a model of radicalization and deradicalization based on the notion that the quest for personal significance constitutes a major motivational force that may push individuals toward violent extremism. Radicalization is defined as the process of supporting or engaging in activities deemed (by others) as in violation of important social norms (e.g., the killing of civilians). In these terms, radicalization (1) is a matter of degree (in which mere attitudinal support for violence reflects a lower degree of radicalization than actual engagement in violence); (2) represents a subjective judgment proffered by those for whom the violated norms seem important but not by those who have devalued or suppressed the norms in question. Our radicalization/deradicalization model contains three crucial components: (1) the motivational component (the quest for personal significance) that defines a goal to which one may be committed, (2) the ideological component that in addition identifies the means of violence as appropriate for this goal's pursuit, and (3) the social process of networking and group dynamics through which the individual comes to share in the violence-justifying ideology and proceeds to implement it as a means of significance gain. We present empirical evidence consistent with our model's assumptions and discuss its implications for policies of preventing radicalization and effecting deradicalization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-93
Number of pages25
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume35
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

Fingerprint

radicalization
radicalism
Violence
psychology
Psychology
violence
Social Networking
Group Processes
group dynamics
Social Norms
social process
networking
Extremism
Radicalization
ideology
evidence

Keywords

  • Deradicalization
  • Goal systems
  • Radicalization
  • Significance quest
  • Violent extremism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Belanger, J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35(SUPPL.1), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12163

The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization : How significance quest impacts violent extremism. / Kruglanski, Arie W.; Gelfand, Michele J.; Belanger, Jocelyn; Sheveland, Anna; Hetiarachchi, Malkanthi; Gunaratna, Rohan.

In: Political Psychology, Vol. 35, No. SUPPL.1, 01.02.2014, p. 69-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kruglanski, AW, Gelfand, MJ, Belanger, J, Sheveland, A, Hetiarachchi, M & Gunaratna, R 2014, 'The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism', Political Psychology, vol. 35, no. SUPPL.1, pp. 69-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12163
Kruglanski, Arie W. ; Gelfand, Michele J. ; Belanger, Jocelyn ; Sheveland, Anna ; Hetiarachchi, Malkanthi ; Gunaratna, Rohan. / The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization : How significance quest impacts violent extremism. In: Political Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. SUPPL.1. pp. 69-93.
@article{6dcc2e68353d40b1b6b3003a0befc574,
title = "The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism",
abstract = "We present a model of radicalization and deradicalization based on the notion that the quest for personal significance constitutes a major motivational force that may push individuals toward violent extremism. Radicalization is defined as the process of supporting or engaging in activities deemed (by others) as in violation of important social norms (e.g., the killing of civilians). In these terms, radicalization (1) is a matter of degree (in which mere attitudinal support for violence reflects a lower degree of radicalization than actual engagement in violence); (2) represents a subjective judgment proffered by those for whom the violated norms seem important but not by those who have devalued or suppressed the norms in question. Our radicalization/deradicalization model contains three crucial components: (1) the motivational component (the quest for personal significance) that defines a goal to which one may be committed, (2) the ideological component that in addition identifies the means of violence as appropriate for this goal's pursuit, and (3) the social process of networking and group dynamics through which the individual comes to share in the violence-justifying ideology and proceeds to implement it as a means of significance gain. We present empirical evidence consistent with our model's assumptions and discuss its implications for policies of preventing radicalization and effecting deradicalization.",
keywords = "Deradicalization, Goal systems, Radicalization, Significance quest, Violent extremism",
author = "Kruglanski, {Arie W.} and Gelfand, {Michele J.} and Jocelyn Belanger and Anna Sheveland and Malkanthi Hetiarachchi and Rohan Gunaratna",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pops.12163",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "69--93",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization

T2 - How significance quest impacts violent extremism

AU - Kruglanski, Arie W.

AU - Gelfand, Michele J.

AU - Belanger, Jocelyn

AU - Sheveland, Anna

AU - Hetiarachchi, Malkanthi

AU - Gunaratna, Rohan

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - We present a model of radicalization and deradicalization based on the notion that the quest for personal significance constitutes a major motivational force that may push individuals toward violent extremism. Radicalization is defined as the process of supporting or engaging in activities deemed (by others) as in violation of important social norms (e.g., the killing of civilians). In these terms, radicalization (1) is a matter of degree (in which mere attitudinal support for violence reflects a lower degree of radicalization than actual engagement in violence); (2) represents a subjective judgment proffered by those for whom the violated norms seem important but not by those who have devalued or suppressed the norms in question. Our radicalization/deradicalization model contains three crucial components: (1) the motivational component (the quest for personal significance) that defines a goal to which one may be committed, (2) the ideological component that in addition identifies the means of violence as appropriate for this goal's pursuit, and (3) the social process of networking and group dynamics through which the individual comes to share in the violence-justifying ideology and proceeds to implement it as a means of significance gain. We present empirical evidence consistent with our model's assumptions and discuss its implications for policies of preventing radicalization and effecting deradicalization.

AB - We present a model of radicalization and deradicalization based on the notion that the quest for personal significance constitutes a major motivational force that may push individuals toward violent extremism. Radicalization is defined as the process of supporting or engaging in activities deemed (by others) as in violation of important social norms (e.g., the killing of civilians). In these terms, radicalization (1) is a matter of degree (in which mere attitudinal support for violence reflects a lower degree of radicalization than actual engagement in violence); (2) represents a subjective judgment proffered by those for whom the violated norms seem important but not by those who have devalued or suppressed the norms in question. Our radicalization/deradicalization model contains three crucial components: (1) the motivational component (the quest for personal significance) that defines a goal to which one may be committed, (2) the ideological component that in addition identifies the means of violence as appropriate for this goal's pursuit, and (3) the social process of networking and group dynamics through which the individual comes to share in the violence-justifying ideology and proceeds to implement it as a means of significance gain. We present empirical evidence consistent with our model's assumptions and discuss its implications for policies of preventing radicalization and effecting deradicalization.

KW - Deradicalization

KW - Goal systems

KW - Radicalization

KW - Significance quest

KW - Violent extremism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892864050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892864050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pops.12163

DO - 10.1111/pops.12163

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84892864050

VL - 35

SP - 69

EP - 93

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -