The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action

Tal Eyal, Nira Liberman, Yaacov Trope, Eva Walther

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present research demonstrated that in considering an action, considerations against (con) the action tend to be subordinate to considerations in favor of (pro) the action in that cons are considered only if the level of pros is sufficient, whereas pros are considered independent of the level of cons (Studies 1A and 1B). The authors therefore concluded that pros constitute a higher construal level than cons and predict, on the basis of temporal construal processes (Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003), that pros would be more salient in making decisions for the more distant future, whereas the reverse should hold for cons. As predicted, participants generated more pros and fewer cons toward new exam procedures (Study 2), public policies (Study 3), and personal and interpersonal behaviors (Studies 4-6) that were expected to take place in the more distant future. This research also examined the limiting conditions and the evaluative consequences of these shifts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)781-795
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume86
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

study behavior
policy studies
Public Policy
Research
Decision Making
public policy
decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. / Eyal, Tal; Liberman, Nira; Trope, Yaacov; Walther, Eva.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 6, 06.2004, p. 781-795.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eyal, Tal ; Liberman, Nira ; Trope, Yaacov ; Walther, Eva. / The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004 ; Vol. 86, No. 6. pp. 781-795.
@article{712f439a3c0c4a1f95b8708de86c88b0,
title = "The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action",
abstract = "The present research demonstrated that in considering an action, considerations against (con) the action tend to be subordinate to considerations in favor of (pro) the action in that cons are considered only if the level of pros is sufficient, whereas pros are considered independent of the level of cons (Studies 1A and 1B). The authors therefore concluded that pros constitute a higher construal level than cons and predict, on the basis of temporal construal processes (Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003), that pros would be more salient in making decisions for the more distant future, whereas the reverse should hold for cons. As predicted, participants generated more pros and fewer cons toward new exam procedures (Study 2), public policies (Study 3), and personal and interpersonal behaviors (Studies 4-6) that were expected to take place in the more distant future. This research also examined the limiting conditions and the evaluative consequences of these shifts.",
author = "Tal Eyal and Nira Liberman and Yaacov Trope and Eva Walther",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "781--795",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action

AU - Eyal, Tal

AU - Liberman, Nira

AU - Trope, Yaacov

AU - Walther, Eva

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - The present research demonstrated that in considering an action, considerations against (con) the action tend to be subordinate to considerations in favor of (pro) the action in that cons are considered only if the level of pros is sufficient, whereas pros are considered independent of the level of cons (Studies 1A and 1B). The authors therefore concluded that pros constitute a higher construal level than cons and predict, on the basis of temporal construal processes (Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003), that pros would be more salient in making decisions for the more distant future, whereas the reverse should hold for cons. As predicted, participants generated more pros and fewer cons toward new exam procedures (Study 2), public policies (Study 3), and personal and interpersonal behaviors (Studies 4-6) that were expected to take place in the more distant future. This research also examined the limiting conditions and the evaluative consequences of these shifts.

AB - The present research demonstrated that in considering an action, considerations against (con) the action tend to be subordinate to considerations in favor of (pro) the action in that cons are considered only if the level of pros is sufficient, whereas pros are considered independent of the level of cons (Studies 1A and 1B). The authors therefore concluded that pros constitute a higher construal level than cons and predict, on the basis of temporal construal processes (Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003), that pros would be more salient in making decisions for the more distant future, whereas the reverse should hold for cons. As predicted, participants generated more pros and fewer cons toward new exam procedures (Study 2), public policies (Study 3), and personal and interpersonal behaviors (Studies 4-6) that were expected to take place in the more distant future. This research also examined the limiting conditions and the evaluative consequences of these shifts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2542595586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2542595586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781

M3 - Article

C2 - 15149255

AN - SCOPUS:2542595586

VL - 86

SP - 781

EP - 795

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 6

ER -