THE POLITICS OF PARTICIPATION AND NONPARTICIPATION IN DISPUTE PROCESSES

Christine Harrington

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Although the access to justice movement has placed great emphasis on expanding participation in dispute processing through informal mechanisms, little theoretical or empirical research in the area has explored the relationship between the organization of dispute processing and legal participation. This article develops a framework for investigating that relationship by examining the ideological and organizational structure of participation and nonparticipation in a comparison between mediation and prosecution of minor criminal cases. The analysis suggests that the concept of participation associated with informal mechanisms has played a role in transforming the institutional legitimacy of dispute processing, yet patterns of participation in conventional dispute processes are reproduced in the neighborhood justice center.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)203-230
    Number of pages28
    JournalLaw & Policy
    Volume6
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1984

    Fingerprint

    participation
    politics
    justice
    prosecution
    organizational structure
    mediation
    empirical research
    legitimacy
    organization

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Law

    Cite this

    THE POLITICS OF PARTICIPATION AND NONPARTICIPATION IN DISPUTE PROCESSES. / Harrington, Christine.

    In: Law & Policy, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1984, p. 203-230.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Harrington, Christine. / THE POLITICS OF PARTICIPATION AND NONPARTICIPATION IN DISPUTE PROCESSES. In: Law & Policy. 1984 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 203-230.
    @article{4683dc433e934e61930d94cdd1ed44f1,
    title = "THE POLITICS OF PARTICIPATION AND NONPARTICIPATION IN DISPUTE PROCESSES",
    abstract = "Although the access to justice movement has placed great emphasis on expanding participation in dispute processing through informal mechanisms, little theoretical or empirical research in the area has explored the relationship between the organization of dispute processing and legal participation. This article develops a framework for investigating that relationship by examining the ideological and organizational structure of participation and nonparticipation in a comparison between mediation and prosecution of minor criminal cases. The analysis suggests that the concept of participation associated with informal mechanisms has played a role in transforming the institutional legitimacy of dispute processing, yet patterns of participation in conventional dispute processes are reproduced in the neighborhood justice center.",
    author = "Christine Harrington",
    year = "1984",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9930.1984.tb00323.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "6",
    pages = "203--230",
    journal = "Law and Policy",
    issn = "0265-8240",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - THE POLITICS OF PARTICIPATION AND NONPARTICIPATION IN DISPUTE PROCESSES

    AU - Harrington, Christine

    PY - 1984

    Y1 - 1984

    N2 - Although the access to justice movement has placed great emphasis on expanding participation in dispute processing through informal mechanisms, little theoretical or empirical research in the area has explored the relationship between the organization of dispute processing and legal participation. This article develops a framework for investigating that relationship by examining the ideological and organizational structure of participation and nonparticipation in a comparison between mediation and prosecution of minor criminal cases. The analysis suggests that the concept of participation associated with informal mechanisms has played a role in transforming the institutional legitimacy of dispute processing, yet patterns of participation in conventional dispute processes are reproduced in the neighborhood justice center.

    AB - Although the access to justice movement has placed great emphasis on expanding participation in dispute processing through informal mechanisms, little theoretical or empirical research in the area has explored the relationship between the organization of dispute processing and legal participation. This article develops a framework for investigating that relationship by examining the ideological and organizational structure of participation and nonparticipation in a comparison between mediation and prosecution of minor criminal cases. The analysis suggests that the concept of participation associated with informal mechanisms has played a role in transforming the institutional legitimacy of dispute processing, yet patterns of participation in conventional dispute processes are reproduced in the neighborhood justice center.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994964997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994964997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1984.tb00323.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1984.tb00323.x

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84994964997

    VL - 6

    SP - 203

    EP - 230

    JO - Law and Policy

    JF - Law and Policy

    SN - 0265-8240

    IS - 2

    ER -