The politics of global information sharing

Whose cultural agendas are being advanced?

Kathy Bowrey, Jane Anderson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Open-knowledge communities, the public domain and public policies protecting the global sharing of information and resources seek to counter the last decade of IP maximalization. Such movements aim to rebalance 'public' interests within IP discourse. Historically, dispossession of Indigenous persons in settler communities was concomitant with their exclusion from 'the public'. This has significant consequences for Indigenous peoples struggling to regain control over knowledge resources today. This article considers the imaginary inclusions that underlie Anglo-Australian intellectual property law and considers problems with redressing past injustice by defining Indigenous difference in terms of a cultural exception within intellectual property law.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)479-504
    Number of pages26
    JournalSocial and Legal Studies
    Volume18
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 2009

    Fingerprint

    intellectual property
    Law
    politics
    public interest
    resources
    community
    public policy
    exclusion
    inclusion
    human being
    discourse
    knowledge

    Keywords

    • Empire
    • Enlightenment
    • Indigenous rights
    • Information commons
    • Intellectual property
    • Public domain
    • Race
    • Sovereignty

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law
    • Social Sciences(all)
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    The politics of global information sharing : Whose cultural agendas are being advanced? / Bowrey, Kathy; Anderson, Jane.

    In: Social and Legal Studies, Vol. 18, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 479-504.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bowrey, Kathy ; Anderson, Jane. / The politics of global information sharing : Whose cultural agendas are being advanced?. In: Social and Legal Studies. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 479-504.
    @article{211936ab45ff4cc09e8a08c6ee216778,
    title = "The politics of global information sharing: Whose cultural agendas are being advanced?",
    abstract = "Open-knowledge communities, the public domain and public policies protecting the global sharing of information and resources seek to counter the last decade of IP maximalization. Such movements aim to rebalance 'public' interests within IP discourse. Historically, dispossession of Indigenous persons in settler communities was concomitant with their exclusion from 'the public'. This has significant consequences for Indigenous peoples struggling to regain control over knowledge resources today. This article considers the imaginary inclusions that underlie Anglo-Australian intellectual property law and considers problems with redressing past injustice by defining Indigenous difference in terms of a cultural exception within intellectual property law.",
    keywords = "Empire, Enlightenment, Indigenous rights, Information commons, Intellectual property, Public domain, Race, Sovereignty",
    author = "Kathy Bowrey and Jane Anderson",
    year = "2009",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1177/0964663909345095",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "479--504",
    journal = "Social and Legal Studies",
    issn = "0964-6639",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The politics of global information sharing

    T2 - Whose cultural agendas are being advanced?

    AU - Bowrey, Kathy

    AU - Anderson, Jane

    PY - 2009/12

    Y1 - 2009/12

    N2 - Open-knowledge communities, the public domain and public policies protecting the global sharing of information and resources seek to counter the last decade of IP maximalization. Such movements aim to rebalance 'public' interests within IP discourse. Historically, dispossession of Indigenous persons in settler communities was concomitant with their exclusion from 'the public'. This has significant consequences for Indigenous peoples struggling to regain control over knowledge resources today. This article considers the imaginary inclusions that underlie Anglo-Australian intellectual property law and considers problems with redressing past injustice by defining Indigenous difference in terms of a cultural exception within intellectual property law.

    AB - Open-knowledge communities, the public domain and public policies protecting the global sharing of information and resources seek to counter the last decade of IP maximalization. Such movements aim to rebalance 'public' interests within IP discourse. Historically, dispossession of Indigenous persons in settler communities was concomitant with their exclusion from 'the public'. This has significant consequences for Indigenous peoples struggling to regain control over knowledge resources today. This article considers the imaginary inclusions that underlie Anglo-Australian intellectual property law and considers problems with redressing past injustice by defining Indigenous difference in terms of a cultural exception within intellectual property law.

    KW - Empire

    KW - Enlightenment

    KW - Indigenous rights

    KW - Information commons

    KW - Intellectual property

    KW - Public domain

    KW - Race

    KW - Sovereignty

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72249116329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72249116329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0964663909345095

    DO - 10.1177/0964663909345095

    M3 - Article

    VL - 18

    SP - 479

    EP - 504

    JO - Social and Legal Studies

    JF - Social and Legal Studies

    SN - 0964-6639

    IS - 4

    ER -