The political determinants of economic performance political competition and the sources of growth

Pablo M. Pinto, Jeffrey Timmons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors present and test a theory about the effects of political competition on the sources of economic growth. Using Mankiw, Romer, and Weil's model of economic growth and data for roughly 80 countries, the authors show that political competition decreases the rate of physical capital accumulation and labor mobilization but increases the rate of human capital accumulation and (less conclusively) the rate of productivity change. The results suggest that political competition systematically affects the sources of growth, but those effects are cross-cutting, explaining why democracy itself may be ambiguous. These findings help clarify the debate about regime type and economic performance and suggest new avenues for research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-50
Number of pages25
JournalComparative Political Studies
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2005

Fingerprint

capital accumulation
determinants
economic growth
performance
economics
human capital
mobilization
productivity
regime
democracy
labor

Keywords

  • Economic growth
  • Human capital
  • Investment
  • Political competition
  • Productivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The political determinants of economic performance political competition and the sources of growth. / Pinto, Pablo M.; Timmons, Jeffrey.

In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.02.2005, p. 26-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7cf8a50ff46c4417b13d93b9da8d4ab5,
title = "The political determinants of economic performance political competition and the sources of growth",
abstract = "The authors present and test a theory about the effects of political competition on the sources of economic growth. Using Mankiw, Romer, and Weil's model of economic growth and data for roughly 80 countries, the authors show that political competition decreases the rate of physical capital accumulation and labor mobilization but increases the rate of human capital accumulation and (less conclusively) the rate of productivity change. The results suggest that political competition systematically affects the sources of growth, but those effects are cross-cutting, explaining why democracy itself may be ambiguous. These findings help clarify the debate about regime type and economic performance and suggest new avenues for research.",
keywords = "Economic growth, Human capital, Investment, Political competition, Productivity",
author = "Pinto, {Pablo M.} and Jeffrey Timmons",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0010414004270886",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "26--50",
journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
issn = "0010-4140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The political determinants of economic performance political competition and the sources of growth

AU - Pinto, Pablo M.

AU - Timmons, Jeffrey

PY - 2005/2/1

Y1 - 2005/2/1

N2 - The authors present and test a theory about the effects of political competition on the sources of economic growth. Using Mankiw, Romer, and Weil's model of economic growth and data for roughly 80 countries, the authors show that political competition decreases the rate of physical capital accumulation and labor mobilization but increases the rate of human capital accumulation and (less conclusively) the rate of productivity change. The results suggest that political competition systematically affects the sources of growth, but those effects are cross-cutting, explaining why democracy itself may be ambiguous. These findings help clarify the debate about regime type and economic performance and suggest new avenues for research.

AB - The authors present and test a theory about the effects of political competition on the sources of economic growth. Using Mankiw, Romer, and Weil's model of economic growth and data for roughly 80 countries, the authors show that political competition decreases the rate of physical capital accumulation and labor mobilization but increases the rate of human capital accumulation and (less conclusively) the rate of productivity change. The results suggest that political competition systematically affects the sources of growth, but those effects are cross-cutting, explaining why democracy itself may be ambiguous. These findings help clarify the debate about regime type and economic performance and suggest new avenues for research.

KW - Economic growth

KW - Human capital

KW - Investment

KW - Political competition

KW - Productivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12944317098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12944317098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0010414004270886

DO - 10.1177/0010414004270886

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:12944317098

VL - 38

SP - 26

EP - 50

JO - Comparative Political Studies

JF - Comparative Political Studies

SN - 0010-4140

IS - 1

ER -