The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizations

Madeline Heilman, Richard A. Guzzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This investigation was designed to determine whether attributional processes mediate discriminatory reward allocation in organizations. Subjects, who were given different causal explanations for the work success of four male or female employees, rated the appropriateness of several personnel actions and indicated their preference among them for each employee. Results indicated that, as expected, the causal explanations typically used to account for a woman's work success (luck, effort, task difficulty) as contrasted with that typically used to account for a man's work success (ability) produced tendencies to award fewer and less desirable organizational rewards. This was true whether the employee being considered was male or female. Thus, the data suggest that the differential causal explanations that arise from sex differences, not the sex differences themselves, result in the unequal treatment of equally successful men and women. Implications of this finding both for future research and for organizational practices are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)346-357
Number of pages12
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1978

Fingerprint

Sexism
Reward
Sex Characteristics
Aptitude
Mediator
Employees
Sex discrimination
Sex differences
Therapeutics

Cite this

The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizations. / Heilman, Madeline; Guzzo, Richard A.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1978, p. 346-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d97dcd951b484c65959bef33e10c904d,
title = "The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizations",
abstract = "This investigation was designed to determine whether attributional processes mediate discriminatory reward allocation in organizations. Subjects, who were given different causal explanations for the work success of four male or female employees, rated the appropriateness of several personnel actions and indicated their preference among them for each employee. Results indicated that, as expected, the causal explanations typically used to account for a woman's work success (luck, effort, task difficulty) as contrasted with that typically used to account for a man's work success (ability) produced tendencies to award fewer and less desirable organizational rewards. This was true whether the employee being considered was male or female. Thus, the data suggest that the differential causal explanations that arise from sex differences, not the sex differences themselves, result in the unequal treatment of equally successful men and women. Implications of this finding both for future research and for organizational practices are discussed.",
author = "Madeline Heilman and Guzzo, {Richard A.}",
year = "1978",
doi = "10.1016/0030-5073(78)90058-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "346--357",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizations

AU - Heilman, Madeline

AU - Guzzo, Richard A.

PY - 1978

Y1 - 1978

N2 - This investigation was designed to determine whether attributional processes mediate discriminatory reward allocation in organizations. Subjects, who were given different causal explanations for the work success of four male or female employees, rated the appropriateness of several personnel actions and indicated their preference among them for each employee. Results indicated that, as expected, the causal explanations typically used to account for a woman's work success (luck, effort, task difficulty) as contrasted with that typically used to account for a man's work success (ability) produced tendencies to award fewer and less desirable organizational rewards. This was true whether the employee being considered was male or female. Thus, the data suggest that the differential causal explanations that arise from sex differences, not the sex differences themselves, result in the unequal treatment of equally successful men and women. Implications of this finding both for future research and for organizational practices are discussed.

AB - This investigation was designed to determine whether attributional processes mediate discriminatory reward allocation in organizations. Subjects, who were given different causal explanations for the work success of four male or female employees, rated the appropriateness of several personnel actions and indicated their preference among them for each employee. Results indicated that, as expected, the causal explanations typically used to account for a woman's work success (luck, effort, task difficulty) as contrasted with that typically used to account for a man's work success (ability) produced tendencies to award fewer and less desirable organizational rewards. This was true whether the employee being considered was male or female. Thus, the data suggest that the differential causal explanations that arise from sex differences, not the sex differences themselves, result in the unequal treatment of equally successful men and women. Implications of this finding both for future research and for organizational practices are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001539621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001539621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90058-2

DO - 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90058-2

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 346

EP - 357

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 3

ER -