The people’s perspective on libertarian-paternalistic policies

Ayala Arad, Ariel Rubinstein

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We examine the views toward libertarian-paternalistic (soft) governmental interventions in a series of online experiments conducted in three countries. We use both standard and new methods to elicit attitudes toward soft interventions in various hypothetical scenarios. The majority of the participants accept these types of interventions by the government. However, a substantial proportion opposes them and would prefer that the government simply provide information to help the public make the right choice rather than use a more effective choice architecture intervention. Some even refuse to make the choice that the government promotes, although they would have done so in the absence of the intervention. The opposition to soft interventions appears to be driven by concerns about manipulation and the fear of a slippery slope to nonconsensual interventions. Opposition to soft interventions is reduced when they are implemented by employers rather than the government.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)311-333
    Number of pages23
    JournalJournal of Law and Economics
    Volume61
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    opposition
    manipulation
    employer
    scenario
    anxiety
    Government
    experiment
    Employers
    Proportion
    Scenarios
    Experiment
    Manipulation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Law

    Cite this

    The people’s perspective on libertarian-paternalistic policies. / Arad, Ayala; Rubinstein, Ariel.

    In: Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 61, No. 2, 01.05.2018, p. 311-333.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Arad, Ayala ; Rubinstein, Ariel. / The people’s perspective on libertarian-paternalistic policies. In: Journal of Law and Economics. 2018 ; Vol. 61, No. 2. pp. 311-333.
    @article{f3031f774e4844d4b7fca47b9243f1f2,
    title = "The people’s perspective on libertarian-paternalistic policies",
    abstract = "We examine the views toward libertarian-paternalistic (soft) governmental interventions in a series of online experiments conducted in three countries. We use both standard and new methods to elicit attitudes toward soft interventions in various hypothetical scenarios. The majority of the participants accept these types of interventions by the government. However, a substantial proportion opposes them and would prefer that the government simply provide information to help the public make the right choice rather than use a more effective choice architecture intervention. Some even refuse to make the choice that the government promotes, although they would have done so in the absence of the intervention. The opposition to soft interventions appears to be driven by concerns about manipulation and the fear of a slippery slope to nonconsensual interventions. Opposition to soft interventions is reduced when they are implemented by employers rather than the government.",
    author = "Ayala Arad and Ariel Rubinstein",
    year = "2018",
    month = "5",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1086/698608",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "61",
    pages = "311--333",
    journal = "Journal of Law and Economics",
    issn = "0022-2186",
    publisher = "University of Chicago",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The people’s perspective on libertarian-paternalistic policies

    AU - Arad, Ayala

    AU - Rubinstein, Ariel

    PY - 2018/5/1

    Y1 - 2018/5/1

    N2 - We examine the views toward libertarian-paternalistic (soft) governmental interventions in a series of online experiments conducted in three countries. We use both standard and new methods to elicit attitudes toward soft interventions in various hypothetical scenarios. The majority of the participants accept these types of interventions by the government. However, a substantial proportion opposes them and would prefer that the government simply provide information to help the public make the right choice rather than use a more effective choice architecture intervention. Some even refuse to make the choice that the government promotes, although they would have done so in the absence of the intervention. The opposition to soft interventions appears to be driven by concerns about manipulation and the fear of a slippery slope to nonconsensual interventions. Opposition to soft interventions is reduced when they are implemented by employers rather than the government.

    AB - We examine the views toward libertarian-paternalistic (soft) governmental interventions in a series of online experiments conducted in three countries. We use both standard and new methods to elicit attitudes toward soft interventions in various hypothetical scenarios. The majority of the participants accept these types of interventions by the government. However, a substantial proportion opposes them and would prefer that the government simply provide information to help the public make the right choice rather than use a more effective choice architecture intervention. Some even refuse to make the choice that the government promotes, although they would have done so in the absence of the intervention. The opposition to soft interventions appears to be driven by concerns about manipulation and the fear of a slippery slope to nonconsensual interventions. Opposition to soft interventions is reduced when they are implemented by employers rather than the government.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055530175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055530175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1086/698608

    DO - 10.1086/698608

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85055530175

    VL - 61

    SP - 311

    EP - 333

    JO - Journal of Law and Economics

    JF - Journal of Law and Economics

    SN - 0022-2186

    IS - 2

    ER -