The 'Own Children' fertility estimation procedure

A reappraisal

Christopher Avery, Travis St Clair, Michael Levin, Kenneth Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Full Birth History has become the dominant source of estimates of fertility levels and trends for countries lacking complete birth registration. An alternative, the 'Own Children' method, derives fertility estimates from household age distributions, but is now rarely used, partly because of concerns about its accuracy. We compared the estimates from these two procedures by applying them to 56 recent Demographic and Health Surveys. On average, 'Own Children' estimates of recent total fertility rates are 3 per cent lower than birth-history estimates. Much of this difference stems from selection bias in the collection of birth histories: women with more children are more likely to be interviewed. We conclude that full birth histories overestimate total fertility, and that the 'Own Children' method gives estimates of total fertility that may better reflect overall national fertility. We recommend the routine application of the 'Own Children' method to census and household survey data to estimate fertility levels and trends.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-183
Number of pages13
JournalPopulation Studies
Volume67
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

estimation procedure
fertility
history
trend
fertility rate
household survey
Fertility
census
health
History

Keywords

  • birth history
  • estimation
  • fertility
  • Own Children
  • total fertility rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • History

Cite this

The 'Own Children' fertility estimation procedure : A reappraisal. / Avery, Christopher; St Clair, Travis; Levin, Michael; Hill, Kenneth.

In: Population Studies, Vol. 67, No. 2, 2013, p. 171-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Avery, Christopher ; St Clair, Travis ; Levin, Michael ; Hill, Kenneth. / The 'Own Children' fertility estimation procedure : A reappraisal. In: Population Studies. 2013 ; Vol. 67, No. 2. pp. 171-183.
@article{ae7250533dd940c2a84df05c06c33f27,
title = "The 'Own Children' fertility estimation procedure: A reappraisal",
abstract = "The Full Birth History has become the dominant source of estimates of fertility levels and trends for countries lacking complete birth registration. An alternative, the 'Own Children' method, derives fertility estimates from household age distributions, but is now rarely used, partly because of concerns about its accuracy. We compared the estimates from these two procedures by applying them to 56 recent Demographic and Health Surveys. On average, 'Own Children' estimates of recent total fertility rates are 3 per cent lower than birth-history estimates. Much of this difference stems from selection bias in the collection of birth histories: women with more children are more likely to be interviewed. We conclude that full birth histories overestimate total fertility, and that the 'Own Children' method gives estimates of total fertility that may better reflect overall national fertility. We recommend the routine application of the 'Own Children' method to census and household survey data to estimate fertility levels and trends.",
keywords = "birth history, estimation, fertility, Own Children, total fertility rate",
author = "Christopher Avery and {St Clair}, Travis and Michael Levin and Kenneth Hill",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/00324728.2013.769616",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "171--183",
journal = "Population Studies",
issn = "0032-4728",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 'Own Children' fertility estimation procedure

T2 - A reappraisal

AU - Avery, Christopher

AU - St Clair, Travis

AU - Levin, Michael

AU - Hill, Kenneth

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The Full Birth History has become the dominant source of estimates of fertility levels and trends for countries lacking complete birth registration. An alternative, the 'Own Children' method, derives fertility estimates from household age distributions, but is now rarely used, partly because of concerns about its accuracy. We compared the estimates from these two procedures by applying them to 56 recent Demographic and Health Surveys. On average, 'Own Children' estimates of recent total fertility rates are 3 per cent lower than birth-history estimates. Much of this difference stems from selection bias in the collection of birth histories: women with more children are more likely to be interviewed. We conclude that full birth histories overestimate total fertility, and that the 'Own Children' method gives estimates of total fertility that may better reflect overall national fertility. We recommend the routine application of the 'Own Children' method to census and household survey data to estimate fertility levels and trends.

AB - The Full Birth History has become the dominant source of estimates of fertility levels and trends for countries lacking complete birth registration. An alternative, the 'Own Children' method, derives fertility estimates from household age distributions, but is now rarely used, partly because of concerns about its accuracy. We compared the estimates from these two procedures by applying them to 56 recent Demographic and Health Surveys. On average, 'Own Children' estimates of recent total fertility rates are 3 per cent lower than birth-history estimates. Much of this difference stems from selection bias in the collection of birth histories: women with more children are more likely to be interviewed. We conclude that full birth histories overestimate total fertility, and that the 'Own Children' method gives estimates of total fertility that may better reflect overall national fertility. We recommend the routine application of the 'Own Children' method to census and household survey data to estimate fertility levels and trends.

KW - birth history

KW - estimation

KW - fertility

KW - Own Children

KW - total fertility rate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879553814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879553814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00324728.2013.769616

DO - 10.1080/00324728.2013.769616

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 171

EP - 183

JO - Population Studies

JF - Population Studies

SN - 0032-4728

IS - 2

ER -