The Normalization Model of Attention

John H. Reynolds, David J. Heeger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Attention has been found to have a wide variety of effects on the responses of neurons in visual cortex. We describe a model of attention that exhibits each of these different forms of attentional modulation, depending on the stimulus conditions and the spread (or selectivity) of the attention field in the model. The model helps reconcile proposals that have been taken to represent alternative theories of attention. We argue that the variety and complexity of the results reported in the literature emerge from the variety of empirical protocols that were used, such that the results observed in any one experiment depended on the stimulus conditions and the subject's attentional strategy, a notion that we define precisely in terms of the attention field in the model, but that has not typically been completely under experimental control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-185
Number of pages18
JournalNeuron
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 29 2009

Fingerprint

Visual Cortex
Neurons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The Normalization Model of Attention. / Reynolds, John H.; Heeger, David J.

In: Neuron, Vol. 61, No. 2, 29.01.2009, p. 168-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reynolds, John H. ; Heeger, David J. / The Normalization Model of Attention. In: Neuron. 2009 ; Vol. 61, No. 2. pp. 168-185.
@article{fa53c991a74d4ecfa0138b714f0b802f,
title = "The Normalization Model of Attention",
abstract = "Attention has been found to have a wide variety of effects on the responses of neurons in visual cortex. We describe a model of attention that exhibits each of these different forms of attentional modulation, depending on the stimulus conditions and the spread (or selectivity) of the attention field in the model. The model helps reconcile proposals that have been taken to represent alternative theories of attention. We argue that the variety and complexity of the results reported in the literature emerge from the variety of empirical protocols that were used, such that the results observed in any one experiment depended on the stimulus conditions and the subject's attentional strategy, a notion that we define precisely in terms of the attention field in the model, but that has not typically been completely under experimental control.",
author = "Reynolds, {John H.} and Heeger, {David J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "168--185",
journal = "Neuron",
issn = "0896-6273",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Normalization Model of Attention

AU - Reynolds, John H.

AU - Heeger, David J.

PY - 2009/1/29

Y1 - 2009/1/29

N2 - Attention has been found to have a wide variety of effects on the responses of neurons in visual cortex. We describe a model of attention that exhibits each of these different forms of attentional modulation, depending on the stimulus conditions and the spread (or selectivity) of the attention field in the model. The model helps reconcile proposals that have been taken to represent alternative theories of attention. We argue that the variety and complexity of the results reported in the literature emerge from the variety of empirical protocols that were used, such that the results observed in any one experiment depended on the stimulus conditions and the subject's attentional strategy, a notion that we define precisely in terms of the attention field in the model, but that has not typically been completely under experimental control.

AB - Attention has been found to have a wide variety of effects on the responses of neurons in visual cortex. We describe a model of attention that exhibits each of these different forms of attentional modulation, depending on the stimulus conditions and the spread (or selectivity) of the attention field in the model. The model helps reconcile proposals that have been taken to represent alternative theories of attention. We argue that the variety and complexity of the results reported in the literature emerge from the variety of empirical protocols that were used, such that the results observed in any one experiment depended on the stimulus conditions and the subject's attentional strategy, a notion that we define precisely in terms of the attention field in the model, but that has not typically been completely under experimental control.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58549119195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58549119195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 168

EP - 185

JO - Neuron

JF - Neuron

SN - 0896-6273

IS - 2

ER -