The next generation of court-mandated domestic violence treatment: A comparison study of batterer intervention and restorative justice programs

Linda Mills, Briana Barocas, Barak Ariel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: The most common approach to treatment of domestic violence crimes in the United States is the mandated group-based Batterer Intervention Program (BIP). Several alternative treatment approaches have been developed over the years, including a restorative justice-based treatment program for domestic violence offenders called Circles of Peace (CP). This study compared a CP program administered in Arizona with a local BIP program, in controlled settings. Methods: This study involved a randomized controlled trial with 152 domestic violence cases randomly assigned to either BIP or CP between September 2005 and March 2007. Independent sample t tests were used to measure treatment outcomes post-random assignment, in terms of both domestic violence and non-domestic violence re-arrest rates during four follow-up periods (6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Results: CP participants experienced less recidivism than BIP during all follow-up comparisons. However, statistically significant differences were detected only for the 6-month (p <.1) and the 12-month (p <.05) follow-up comparisons for non-domestic violence re-arrests, and no statistically significant differences were detected for the domestic violence re-arrests. Conclusions: The findings are generally statistically non-significant at .05. While these results do not suggest a change in policy from BIP to CP for domestic violence crimes, it does dispel the popular belief that restorative justice cannot be used to treat domestic violence criminal activity, in that CP does no worse than the traditional batterer intervention program. Given the low statistical power and high attrition rates, more research is necessary to test CP and restorative justice treatment generally in court-mandated domestic violence cases in order to understand the treatment impact on both domestic violence and non-domestic violence offenders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-90
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Experimental Criminology
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

domestic violence
justice
peace
violence
offender
offense

Keywords

  • Domestic violence
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Restorative justice
  • Treatment programs for offenders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

The next generation of court-mandated domestic violence treatment : A comparison study of batterer intervention and restorative justice programs. / Mills, Linda; Barocas, Briana; Ariel, Barak.

In: Journal of Experimental Criminology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 65-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b77f978ca807455bb73fafe48f4f7a57,
title = "The next generation of court-mandated domestic violence treatment: A comparison study of batterer intervention and restorative justice programs",
abstract = "Objectives: The most common approach to treatment of domestic violence crimes in the United States is the mandated group-based Batterer Intervention Program (BIP). Several alternative treatment approaches have been developed over the years, including a restorative justice-based treatment program for domestic violence offenders called Circles of Peace (CP). This study compared a CP program administered in Arizona with a local BIP program, in controlled settings. Methods: This study involved a randomized controlled trial with 152 domestic violence cases randomly assigned to either BIP or CP between September 2005 and March 2007. Independent sample t tests were used to measure treatment outcomes post-random assignment, in terms of both domestic violence and non-domestic violence re-arrest rates during four follow-up periods (6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Results: CP participants experienced less recidivism than BIP during all follow-up comparisons. However, statistically significant differences were detected only for the 6-month (p <.1) and the 12-month (p <.05) follow-up comparisons for non-domestic violence re-arrests, and no statistically significant differences were detected for the domestic violence re-arrests. Conclusions: The findings are generally statistically non-significant at .05. While these results do not suggest a change in policy from BIP to CP for domestic violence crimes, it does dispel the popular belief that restorative justice cannot be used to treat domestic violence criminal activity, in that CP does no worse than the traditional batterer intervention program. Given the low statistical power and high attrition rates, more research is necessary to test CP and restorative justice treatment generally in court-mandated domestic violence cases in order to understand the treatment impact on both domestic violence and non-domestic violence offenders.",
keywords = "Domestic violence, Randomized controlled trial, Restorative justice, Treatment programs for offenders",
author = "Linda Mills and Briana Barocas and Barak Ariel",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11292-012-9164-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "65--90",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Criminology",
issn = "1573-3750",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The next generation of court-mandated domestic violence treatment

T2 - A comparison study of batterer intervention and restorative justice programs

AU - Mills, Linda

AU - Barocas, Briana

AU - Ariel, Barak

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The most common approach to treatment of domestic violence crimes in the United States is the mandated group-based Batterer Intervention Program (BIP). Several alternative treatment approaches have been developed over the years, including a restorative justice-based treatment program for domestic violence offenders called Circles of Peace (CP). This study compared a CP program administered in Arizona with a local BIP program, in controlled settings. Methods: This study involved a randomized controlled trial with 152 domestic violence cases randomly assigned to either BIP or CP between September 2005 and March 2007. Independent sample t tests were used to measure treatment outcomes post-random assignment, in terms of both domestic violence and non-domestic violence re-arrest rates during four follow-up periods (6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Results: CP participants experienced less recidivism than BIP during all follow-up comparisons. However, statistically significant differences were detected only for the 6-month (p <.1) and the 12-month (p <.05) follow-up comparisons for non-domestic violence re-arrests, and no statistically significant differences were detected for the domestic violence re-arrests. Conclusions: The findings are generally statistically non-significant at .05. While these results do not suggest a change in policy from BIP to CP for domestic violence crimes, it does dispel the popular belief that restorative justice cannot be used to treat domestic violence criminal activity, in that CP does no worse than the traditional batterer intervention program. Given the low statistical power and high attrition rates, more research is necessary to test CP and restorative justice treatment generally in court-mandated domestic violence cases in order to understand the treatment impact on both domestic violence and non-domestic violence offenders.

AB - Objectives: The most common approach to treatment of domestic violence crimes in the United States is the mandated group-based Batterer Intervention Program (BIP). Several alternative treatment approaches have been developed over the years, including a restorative justice-based treatment program for domestic violence offenders called Circles of Peace (CP). This study compared a CP program administered in Arizona with a local BIP program, in controlled settings. Methods: This study involved a randomized controlled trial with 152 domestic violence cases randomly assigned to either BIP or CP between September 2005 and March 2007. Independent sample t tests were used to measure treatment outcomes post-random assignment, in terms of both domestic violence and non-domestic violence re-arrest rates during four follow-up periods (6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Results: CP participants experienced less recidivism than BIP during all follow-up comparisons. However, statistically significant differences were detected only for the 6-month (p <.1) and the 12-month (p <.05) follow-up comparisons for non-domestic violence re-arrests, and no statistically significant differences were detected for the domestic violence re-arrests. Conclusions: The findings are generally statistically non-significant at .05. While these results do not suggest a change in policy from BIP to CP for domestic violence crimes, it does dispel the popular belief that restorative justice cannot be used to treat domestic violence criminal activity, in that CP does no worse than the traditional batterer intervention program. Given the low statistical power and high attrition rates, more research is necessary to test CP and restorative justice treatment generally in court-mandated domestic violence cases in order to understand the treatment impact on both domestic violence and non-domestic violence offenders.

KW - Domestic violence

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Restorative justice

KW - Treatment programs for offenders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874204154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874204154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11292-012-9164-x

DO - 10.1007/s11292-012-9164-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84874204154

VL - 9

SP - 65

EP - 90

JO - Journal of Experimental Criminology

JF - Journal of Experimental Criminology

SN - 1573-3750

IS - 1

ER -