The meaning of 'Theory'

Gabriel Abend

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    'Theory' is one of the most important words in the lexicon of contemporary sociology. Yet, their ubiquity notwithstanding, it is quite unclear what sociologists mean by the words 'theory,' 'theoretical,' and 'theorize.' I argue that confusions about the meaning of 'theory' have brought about undesirable consequences, including conceptual muddles and even downright miscommunication. In this paper I tackle two questions: (a) what does 'theory' mean in the sociological language?; and (b) what ought 'theory' to mean in the sociological language? I proceed in five stages. First, I explain why one should ask a semantic question about 'theory.' Second, I lexicographically identify seven different senses of the word, which I distinguish by means of subscripts. Third, I show some difficulties that the current lack of semantic clarity has led sociology to. Fourth, I articulate the question, 'what ought "theory" to mean?,' which I dub the 'semantic predicament' (SP), and I consider what one can learn about it from the theory literature. Fifth, I recommend a 'semantic therapy' for sociology, and advance two arguments about SP: (a) the principle of practical reason - SP is to a large extent a political issue, which should be addressed with the help of political mechanisms; and (b) the principle of ontological and epistemological pluralism - the solution to SP should not be too ontologically and epistemologically demanding.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)173-199
    Number of pages27
    JournalSociological Theory
    Volume26
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2008

    Fingerprint

    semantics
    sociology
    literature theory
    language
    pluralism
    sociologist
    lack

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    The meaning of 'Theory'. / Abend, Gabriel.

    In: Sociological Theory, Vol. 26, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 173-199.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abend, Gabriel. / The meaning of 'Theory'. In: Sociological Theory. 2008 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 173-199.
    @article{7d1de29cea5c4a99ac114d4d7f1ab2c4,
    title = "The meaning of 'Theory'",
    abstract = "'Theory' is one of the most important words in the lexicon of contemporary sociology. Yet, their ubiquity notwithstanding, it is quite unclear what sociologists mean by the words 'theory,' 'theoretical,' and 'theorize.' I argue that confusions about the meaning of 'theory' have brought about undesirable consequences, including conceptual muddles and even downright miscommunication. In this paper I tackle two questions: (a) what does 'theory' mean in the sociological language?; and (b) what ought 'theory' to mean in the sociological language? I proceed in five stages. First, I explain why one should ask a semantic question about 'theory.' Second, I lexicographically identify seven different senses of the word, which I distinguish by means of subscripts. Third, I show some difficulties that the current lack of semantic clarity has led sociology to. Fourth, I articulate the question, 'what ought {"}theory{"} to mean?,' which I dub the 'semantic predicament' (SP), and I consider what one can learn about it from the theory literature. Fifth, I recommend a 'semantic therapy' for sociology, and advance two arguments about SP: (a) the principle of practical reason - SP is to a large extent a political issue, which should be addressed with the help of political mechanisms; and (b) the principle of ontological and epistemological pluralism - the solution to SP should not be too ontologically and epistemologically demanding.",
    author = "Gabriel Abend",
    year = "2008",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "173--199",
    journal = "Sociological Theory",
    issn = "0735-2751",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The meaning of 'Theory'

    AU - Abend, Gabriel

    PY - 2008/6

    Y1 - 2008/6

    N2 - 'Theory' is one of the most important words in the lexicon of contemporary sociology. Yet, their ubiquity notwithstanding, it is quite unclear what sociologists mean by the words 'theory,' 'theoretical,' and 'theorize.' I argue that confusions about the meaning of 'theory' have brought about undesirable consequences, including conceptual muddles and even downright miscommunication. In this paper I tackle two questions: (a) what does 'theory' mean in the sociological language?; and (b) what ought 'theory' to mean in the sociological language? I proceed in five stages. First, I explain why one should ask a semantic question about 'theory.' Second, I lexicographically identify seven different senses of the word, which I distinguish by means of subscripts. Third, I show some difficulties that the current lack of semantic clarity has led sociology to. Fourth, I articulate the question, 'what ought "theory" to mean?,' which I dub the 'semantic predicament' (SP), and I consider what one can learn about it from the theory literature. Fifth, I recommend a 'semantic therapy' for sociology, and advance two arguments about SP: (a) the principle of practical reason - SP is to a large extent a political issue, which should be addressed with the help of political mechanisms; and (b) the principle of ontological and epistemological pluralism - the solution to SP should not be too ontologically and epistemologically demanding.

    AB - 'Theory' is one of the most important words in the lexicon of contemporary sociology. Yet, their ubiquity notwithstanding, it is quite unclear what sociologists mean by the words 'theory,' 'theoretical,' and 'theorize.' I argue that confusions about the meaning of 'theory' have brought about undesirable consequences, including conceptual muddles and even downright miscommunication. In this paper I tackle two questions: (a) what does 'theory' mean in the sociological language?; and (b) what ought 'theory' to mean in the sociological language? I proceed in five stages. First, I explain why one should ask a semantic question about 'theory.' Second, I lexicographically identify seven different senses of the word, which I distinguish by means of subscripts. Third, I show some difficulties that the current lack of semantic clarity has led sociology to. Fourth, I articulate the question, 'what ought "theory" to mean?,' which I dub the 'semantic predicament' (SP), and I consider what one can learn about it from the theory literature. Fifth, I recommend a 'semantic therapy' for sociology, and advance two arguments about SP: (a) the principle of practical reason - SP is to a large extent a political issue, which should be addressed with the help of political mechanisms; and (b) the principle of ontological and epistemological pluralism - the solution to SP should not be too ontologically and epistemologically demanding.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449143028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449143028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 26

    SP - 173

    EP - 199

    JO - Sociological Theory

    JF - Sociological Theory

    SN - 0735-2751

    IS - 2

    ER -