The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice

Karolina M. Lempert, Elizabeth Phelps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Intertemporal choices are ubiquitous: people often have to choose between outcomes realized at different times. Although it is generally believed that people have stable tendencies toward being impulsive or patient, an emerging body of evidence indicates that intertemporal choice is malleable and can be profoundly influenced by context. How the choice is framed, or the state of the decision-maker at the time of choice, can induce a shift in preference. Framing effects are underpinned by allocation of attention to choice attributes, reference dependence, and time construal. Incidental affective states and prospection also influence intertemporal choice. We advocate that intertemporal choice models account for these context effects, and encourage the use of this knowledge to nudge people toward making more advantageous choices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-74
Number of pages11
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Context
  • Framing
  • Intertemporal choice
  • Temporal discounting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice. / Lempert, Karolina M.; Phelps, Elizabeth.

In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 64-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lempert, Karolina M. ; Phelps, Elizabeth. / The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2016 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 64-74.
@article{7a44bb7569dd4c75a2ff42d568546eaf,
title = "The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice",
abstract = "Intertemporal choices are ubiquitous: people often have to choose between outcomes realized at different times. Although it is generally believed that people have stable tendencies toward being impulsive or patient, an emerging body of evidence indicates that intertemporal choice is malleable and can be profoundly influenced by context. How the choice is framed, or the state of the decision-maker at the time of choice, can induce a shift in preference. Framing effects are underpinned by allocation of attention to choice attributes, reference dependence, and time construal. Incidental affective states and prospection also influence intertemporal choice. We advocate that intertemporal choice models account for these context effects, and encourage the use of this knowledge to nudge people toward making more advantageous choices.",
keywords = "Affect, Context, Framing, Intertemporal choice, Temporal discounting",
author = "Lempert, {Karolina M.} and Elizabeth Phelps",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "64--74",
journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",
issn = "1364-6613",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice

AU - Lempert, Karolina M.

AU - Phelps, Elizabeth

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Intertemporal choices are ubiquitous: people often have to choose between outcomes realized at different times. Although it is generally believed that people have stable tendencies toward being impulsive or patient, an emerging body of evidence indicates that intertemporal choice is malleable and can be profoundly influenced by context. How the choice is framed, or the state of the decision-maker at the time of choice, can induce a shift in preference. Framing effects are underpinned by allocation of attention to choice attributes, reference dependence, and time construal. Incidental affective states and prospection also influence intertemporal choice. We advocate that intertemporal choice models account for these context effects, and encourage the use of this knowledge to nudge people toward making more advantageous choices.

AB - Intertemporal choices are ubiquitous: people often have to choose between outcomes realized at different times. Although it is generally believed that people have stable tendencies toward being impulsive or patient, an emerging body of evidence indicates that intertemporal choice is malleable and can be profoundly influenced by context. How the choice is framed, or the state of the decision-maker at the time of choice, can induce a shift in preference. Framing effects are underpinned by allocation of attention to choice attributes, reference dependence, and time construal. Incidental affective states and prospection also influence intertemporal choice. We advocate that intertemporal choice models account for these context effects, and encourage the use of this knowledge to nudge people toward making more advantageous choices.

KW - Affect

KW - Context

KW - Framing

KW - Intertemporal choice

KW - Temporal discounting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952637733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952637733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 26483153

AN - SCOPUS:84952637733

VL - 20

SP - 64

EP - 74

JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

SN - 1364-6613

IS - 1

ER -