The Love of Neuroscience

A Sociological Account

Gabriel Abend

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    I make a contribution to the sociology of epistemologies by examining the neuroscience literature on love from 2000 to 2016. I find that researchers make consequential assumptions concerning the production or generation of love, its temporality, its individual character, and appropriate control conditions. Next, I consider how to account for these assumptions’ being common in the literature. More generally, I’m interested in the ways in which epistemic communities construe, conceive of, and publicly represent and work with their objects of inquiry—and what’s thereby assumed about them and about the world. I argue that these implicit or explicit assumptions are a distinct type of explanandum, whose distinctiveness sociology hasn’t adequately appreciated and taken advantage of. I think it should and I hope it will.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)88-116
    Number of pages29
    JournalSociological Theory
    Volume36
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    neurosciences
    love
    sociology
    epistemology
    community
    literature

    Keywords

    • assumptions
    • knowledge
    • love
    • neural correlates
    • neuroscience
    • science
    • sociology of epistemologies

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    The Love of Neuroscience : A Sociological Account. / Abend, Gabriel.

    In: Sociological Theory, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 88-116.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abend, Gabriel. / The Love of Neuroscience : A Sociological Account. In: Sociological Theory. 2018 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 88-116.
    @article{1345d4824b2647fba58b40a419a9fc62,
    title = "The Love of Neuroscience: A Sociological Account",
    abstract = "I make a contribution to the sociology of epistemologies by examining the neuroscience literature on love from 2000 to 2016. I find that researchers make consequential assumptions concerning the production or generation of love, its temporality, its individual character, and appropriate control conditions. Next, I consider how to account for these assumptions’ being common in the literature. More generally, I’m interested in the ways in which epistemic communities construe, conceive of, and publicly represent and work with their objects of inquiry—and what’s thereby assumed about them and about the world. I argue that these implicit or explicit assumptions are a distinct type of explanandum, whose distinctiveness sociology hasn’t adequately appreciated and taken advantage of. I think it should and I hope it will.",
    keywords = "assumptions, knowledge, love, neural correlates, neuroscience, science, sociology of epistemologies",
    author = "Gabriel Abend",
    year = "2018",
    month = "3",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0735275118759697",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "88--116",
    journal = "Sociological Theory",
    issn = "0735-2751",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Love of Neuroscience

    T2 - A Sociological Account

    AU - Abend, Gabriel

    PY - 2018/3/1

    Y1 - 2018/3/1

    N2 - I make a contribution to the sociology of epistemologies by examining the neuroscience literature on love from 2000 to 2016. I find that researchers make consequential assumptions concerning the production or generation of love, its temporality, its individual character, and appropriate control conditions. Next, I consider how to account for these assumptions’ being common in the literature. More generally, I’m interested in the ways in which epistemic communities construe, conceive of, and publicly represent and work with their objects of inquiry—and what’s thereby assumed about them and about the world. I argue that these implicit or explicit assumptions are a distinct type of explanandum, whose distinctiveness sociology hasn’t adequately appreciated and taken advantage of. I think it should and I hope it will.

    AB - I make a contribution to the sociology of epistemologies by examining the neuroscience literature on love from 2000 to 2016. I find that researchers make consequential assumptions concerning the production or generation of love, its temporality, its individual character, and appropriate control conditions. Next, I consider how to account for these assumptions’ being common in the literature. More generally, I’m interested in the ways in which epistemic communities construe, conceive of, and publicly represent and work with their objects of inquiry—and what’s thereby assumed about them and about the world. I argue that these implicit or explicit assumptions are a distinct type of explanandum, whose distinctiveness sociology hasn’t adequately appreciated and taken advantage of. I think it should and I hope it will.

    KW - assumptions

    KW - knowledge

    KW - love

    KW - neural correlates

    KW - neuroscience

    KW - science

    KW - sociology of epistemologies

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044756543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044756543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0735275118759697

    DO - 10.1177/0735275118759697

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 88

    EP - 116

    JO - Sociological Theory

    JF - Sociological Theory

    SN - 0735-2751

    IS - 1

    ER -