The Locus of Knowledge Effects in Concept Learning

Gregory L. Murphy, Paul D. Allopenna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Three experiments investigated how knowledge influences concept formation and representation in a standard concept acquisition task. The primary comparison was among arbitrary concepts, which had meaningless features; meaningful concepts, which had meaningful features from different domains; and integrated concepts, which had meaningful features interconnected by common knowledge. Experiment 1 found that learning was superior for the integrated concepts but that there was little difference as a function of feature meaningfulness. Experiment 2 suggested that the integrated Ss were learning to form a knowledge-based schema as their concept representation because they did not distinguish the typicality of features that differed in frequency. Experiment 3 introduced a category whose features were from the same domain but were not otherwise related. This concept was as difficult to learn and use as the meaningful concepts were. These comparisons help specify the ways in which knowledge does and does not influence concept formation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)904-919
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume20
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1994

Fingerprint

Concept Formation
Learning
learning
concept formation
experiment
common knowledge
Concept Learning
Locus
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

The Locus of Knowledge Effects in Concept Learning. / Murphy, Gregory L.; Allopenna, Paul D.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, Vol. 20, No. 4, 07.1994, p. 904-919.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murphy, Gregory L. ; Allopenna, Paul D. / The Locus of Knowledge Effects in Concept Learning. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 1994 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 904-919.
@article{e4328bac0c4f482f92528c2a2f3aff66,
title = "The Locus of Knowledge Effects in Concept Learning",
abstract = "Three experiments investigated how knowledge influences concept formation and representation in a standard concept acquisition task. The primary comparison was among arbitrary concepts, which had meaningless features; meaningful concepts, which had meaningful features from different domains; and integrated concepts, which had meaningful features interconnected by common knowledge. Experiment 1 found that learning was superior for the integrated concepts but that there was little difference as a function of feature meaningfulness. Experiment 2 suggested that the integrated Ss were learning to form a knowledge-based schema as their concept representation because they did not distinguish the typicality of features that differed in frequency. Experiment 3 introduced a category whose features were from the same domain but were not otherwise related. This concept was as difficult to learn and use as the meaningful concepts were. These comparisons help specify the ways in which knowledge does and does not influence concept formation.",
author = "Murphy, {Gregory L.} and Allopenna, {Paul D.}",
year = "1994",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "904--919",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Locus of Knowledge Effects in Concept Learning

AU - Murphy, Gregory L.

AU - Allopenna, Paul D.

PY - 1994/7

Y1 - 1994/7

N2 - Three experiments investigated how knowledge influences concept formation and representation in a standard concept acquisition task. The primary comparison was among arbitrary concepts, which had meaningless features; meaningful concepts, which had meaningful features from different domains; and integrated concepts, which had meaningful features interconnected by common knowledge. Experiment 1 found that learning was superior for the integrated concepts but that there was little difference as a function of feature meaningfulness. Experiment 2 suggested that the integrated Ss were learning to form a knowledge-based schema as their concept representation because they did not distinguish the typicality of features that differed in frequency. Experiment 3 introduced a category whose features were from the same domain but were not otherwise related. This concept was as difficult to learn and use as the meaningful concepts were. These comparisons help specify the ways in which knowledge does and does not influence concept formation.

AB - Three experiments investigated how knowledge influences concept formation and representation in a standard concept acquisition task. The primary comparison was among arbitrary concepts, which had meaningless features; meaningful concepts, which had meaningful features from different domains; and integrated concepts, which had meaningful features interconnected by common knowledge. Experiment 1 found that learning was superior for the integrated concepts but that there was little difference as a function of feature meaningfulness. Experiment 2 suggested that the integrated Ss were learning to form a knowledge-based schema as their concept representation because they did not distinguish the typicality of features that differed in frequency. Experiment 3 introduced a category whose features were from the same domain but were not otherwise related. This concept was as difficult to learn and use as the meaningful concepts were. These comparisons help specify the ways in which knowledge does and does not influence concept formation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028471711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028471711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 904

EP - 919

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 4

ER -