The literature and the science of 'two cultures' historiography

Guy Ortolano

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper discusses the historiography of the 'two cultures' controversy. C. P. Snow's lament about the 'two cultures', literary and scientific, has inspired a wide range of comment-much of which begins by citing Snow and his thesis, before going on to discuss very different things. This paper focuses upon one strand of this commentary, the historical analysis of the controversy itself. A 'historical' analysis is defined here as one that resists the impulse to enter the argument on behalf of Snow or Leavis, to conceive of their argument in the terms that Snow defined, or to invoke their argument as a precursor to some contemporary issue. Instead, a historical interpretation registers distance between that day and this, takes the controversy itself as its object of study, and explores the tensions and associations that came to be packed into those now familiar terms. As the fiftieth anniversary of Snow's Rede Lecture nears, this approach-rather than the repetition of clichés about the bridging of cultures-offers both analytical perspective on the controversy and interpretive possibilities for its examination.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)143-150
    Number of pages8
    JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
    Volume39
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 2008

    Fingerprint

    Two Cultures
    Historiography
    Historical Analysis
    Impulse
    Precursor
    C.P. Snow
    Lament

    Keywords

    • 1960s
    • C. P. Snow
    • Cultural politics
    • F. R. Leavis
    • Literature
    • Two cultures

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • History

    Cite this

    The literature and the science of 'two cultures' historiography. / Ortolano, Guy.

    In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 39, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 143-150.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{53f148ab50ba4b75a1a3ce68812813f7,
    title = "The literature and the science of 'two cultures' historiography",
    abstract = "This paper discusses the historiography of the 'two cultures' controversy. C. P. Snow's lament about the 'two cultures', literary and scientific, has inspired a wide range of comment-much of which begins by citing Snow and his thesis, before going on to discuss very different things. This paper focuses upon one strand of this commentary, the historical analysis of the controversy itself. A 'historical' analysis is defined here as one that resists the impulse to enter the argument on behalf of Snow or Leavis, to conceive of their argument in the terms that Snow defined, or to invoke their argument as a precursor to some contemporary issue. Instead, a historical interpretation registers distance between that day and this, takes the controversy itself as its object of study, and explores the tensions and associations that came to be packed into those now familiar terms. As the fiftieth anniversary of Snow's Rede Lecture nears, this approach-rather than the repetition of clich{\'e}s about the bridging of cultures-offers both analytical perspective on the controversy and interpretive possibilities for its examination.",
    keywords = "1960s, C. P. Snow, Cultural politics, F. R. Leavis, Literature, Two cultures",
    author = "Guy Ortolano",
    year = "2008",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.11.012",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "39",
    pages = "143--150",
    journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science",
    issn = "0039-3681",
    publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The literature and the science of 'two cultures' historiography

    AU - Ortolano, Guy

    PY - 2008/3

    Y1 - 2008/3

    N2 - This paper discusses the historiography of the 'two cultures' controversy. C. P. Snow's lament about the 'two cultures', literary and scientific, has inspired a wide range of comment-much of which begins by citing Snow and his thesis, before going on to discuss very different things. This paper focuses upon one strand of this commentary, the historical analysis of the controversy itself. A 'historical' analysis is defined here as one that resists the impulse to enter the argument on behalf of Snow or Leavis, to conceive of their argument in the terms that Snow defined, or to invoke their argument as a precursor to some contemporary issue. Instead, a historical interpretation registers distance between that day and this, takes the controversy itself as its object of study, and explores the tensions and associations that came to be packed into those now familiar terms. As the fiftieth anniversary of Snow's Rede Lecture nears, this approach-rather than the repetition of clichés about the bridging of cultures-offers both analytical perspective on the controversy and interpretive possibilities for its examination.

    AB - This paper discusses the historiography of the 'two cultures' controversy. C. P. Snow's lament about the 'two cultures', literary and scientific, has inspired a wide range of comment-much of which begins by citing Snow and his thesis, before going on to discuss very different things. This paper focuses upon one strand of this commentary, the historical analysis of the controversy itself. A 'historical' analysis is defined here as one that resists the impulse to enter the argument on behalf of Snow or Leavis, to conceive of their argument in the terms that Snow defined, or to invoke their argument as a precursor to some contemporary issue. Instead, a historical interpretation registers distance between that day and this, takes the controversy itself as its object of study, and explores the tensions and associations that came to be packed into those now familiar terms. As the fiftieth anniversary of Snow's Rede Lecture nears, this approach-rather than the repetition of clichés about the bridging of cultures-offers both analytical perspective on the controversy and interpretive possibilities for its examination.

    KW - 1960s

    KW - C. P. Snow

    KW - Cultural politics

    KW - F. R. Leavis

    KW - Literature

    KW - Two cultures

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39749106018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39749106018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.11.012

    DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.11.012

    M3 - Article

    VL - 39

    SP - 143

    EP - 150

    JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

    JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

    SN - 0039-3681

    IS - 1

    ER -