The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society

David Garland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The article offers a descriptive analysis of strategies of crime control in contemporary Britain and elsewhere. It argues that the normality of high crime rates and the limitations of criminal justice agencies have created a new predicament for governments. The response to this predicament has been a recurring ambivalence that helps explain the volatile and contradictory character of recent crime control policy. The article identifies adaptive strategies (responsibilization, defining deviance down, and redefining organizational success) and strategies of denial (the punitive sovereign response), as well as the different criminologies that accompany them.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)445-471
    Number of pages27
    JournalBritish Journal of Criminology
    Volume36
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1996

    Fingerprint

    Crime
    offense
    Criminal Law
    crime rate
    normality
    deviant behavior
    ambivalence
    justice
    Society

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
    • Social Psychology
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
    • Law

    Cite this

    The limits of the sovereign state : Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. / Garland, David.

    In: British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1996, p. 445-471.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{e7835b30a4a84bbb8719ef5d0aec7d7c,
    title = "The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society",
    abstract = "The article offers a descriptive analysis of strategies of crime control in contemporary Britain and elsewhere. It argues that the normality of high crime rates and the limitations of criminal justice agencies have created a new predicament for governments. The response to this predicament has been a recurring ambivalence that helps explain the volatile and contradictory character of recent crime control policy. The article identifies adaptive strategies (responsibilization, defining deviance down, and redefining organizational success) and strategies of denial (the punitive sovereign response), as well as the different criminologies that accompany them.",
    author = "David Garland",
    year = "1996",
    doi = "10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014105",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "445--471",
    journal = "British Journal of Criminology",
    issn = "0007-0955",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The limits of the sovereign state

    T2 - Strategies of crime control in contemporary society

    AU - Garland, David

    PY - 1996

    Y1 - 1996

    N2 - The article offers a descriptive analysis of strategies of crime control in contemporary Britain and elsewhere. It argues that the normality of high crime rates and the limitations of criminal justice agencies have created a new predicament for governments. The response to this predicament has been a recurring ambivalence that helps explain the volatile and contradictory character of recent crime control policy. The article identifies adaptive strategies (responsibilization, defining deviance down, and redefining organizational success) and strategies of denial (the punitive sovereign response), as well as the different criminologies that accompany them.

    AB - The article offers a descriptive analysis of strategies of crime control in contemporary Britain and elsewhere. It argues that the normality of high crime rates and the limitations of criminal justice agencies have created a new predicament for governments. The response to this predicament has been a recurring ambivalence that helps explain the volatile and contradictory character of recent crime control policy. The article identifies adaptive strategies (responsibilization, defining deviance down, and redefining organizational success) and strategies of denial (the punitive sovereign response), as well as the different criminologies that accompany them.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030509474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030509474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014105

    DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014105

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 445

    EP - 471

    JO - British Journal of Criminology

    JF - British Journal of Criminology

    SN - 0007-0955

    IS - 4

    ER -