The legal regime governing transfer of persons in the fight against terrorism

Margaret L. Satterthwaite

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    Introduction: Crimes of terrorism are frequently committed by individuals and groups in countries other than those they target. Even when ‘home-grown’ terrorists are responsible for violent acts, they often flee across borders to evade justice. States seeking to punish acts of terrorism therefore regularly need to obtain custody of individuals accused of committing such acts. They may do so by requesting the extradition or deportation of a suspect from a state where the individual is found. States also directly apprehend suspected terrorists in other countries and deliver them to justice before their own or third states’ courts through ‘rendition to justice’. Finally, when terrorism occurs in the context of armed conflict, states may move suspects from one state to another through wartime processes such as the transfer of prisoners of war. In short, states use both formal and informal processes when transferring individuals suspected of terrorist crimes. The practice of rendition - the involuntary transfer of an individual across borders without recourse to extradition or deportation proceedings - is not new. Indeed, the practice has been used by governments for more than a century. Famous renditions include that of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann from Argentina to Israel, and terrorist Carlos ‘the Jackal’ (Ilich Ramirez Sanchez) from Sudan to France. Although such renditions have been controversial in human rights circles, they have been celebrated by many as crucial in the fight against impunity for grave crimes and are sometimes called ‘rendition to justice’.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationCounter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pages589-638
    Number of pages50
    ISBN (Print)9781139178907, 9781107025387
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

    Fingerprint

    fight against terrorism
    justice
    human being
    extradition
    terrorism
    deportation
    offense
    prisoner of war
    recourse
    Sudan
    accused
    child custody
    Argentina
    Israel
    human rights
    France
    Group

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Satterthwaite, M. L. (2011). The legal regime governing transfer of persons in the fight against terrorism. In Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges (pp. 589-638). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178907.020

    The legal regime governing transfer of persons in the fight against terrorism. / Satterthwaite, Margaret L.

    Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges. Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 589-638.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Satterthwaite, ML 2011, The legal regime governing transfer of persons in the fight against terrorism. in Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges. Cambridge University Press, pp. 589-638. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178907.020
    Satterthwaite ML. The legal regime governing transfer of persons in the fight against terrorism. In Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges. Cambridge University Press. 2011. p. 589-638 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178907.020
    Satterthwaite, Margaret L. / The legal regime governing transfer of persons in the fight against terrorism. Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges. Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp. 589-638
    @inbook{1ab4440e2fb24655b0f999f42f9cf39f,
    title = "The legal regime governing transfer of persons in the fight against terrorism",
    abstract = "Introduction: Crimes of terrorism are frequently committed by individuals and groups in countries other than those they target. Even when ‘home-grown’ terrorists are responsible for violent acts, they often flee across borders to evade justice. States seeking to punish acts of terrorism therefore regularly need to obtain custody of individuals accused of committing such acts. They may do so by requesting the extradition or deportation of a suspect from a state where the individual is found. States also directly apprehend suspected terrorists in other countries and deliver them to justice before their own or third states’ courts through ‘rendition to justice’. Finally, when terrorism occurs in the context of armed conflict, states may move suspects from one state to another through wartime processes such as the transfer of prisoners of war. In short, states use both formal and informal processes when transferring individuals suspected of terrorist crimes. The practice of rendition - the involuntary transfer of an individual across borders without recourse to extradition or deportation proceedings - is not new. Indeed, the practice has been used by governments for more than a century. Famous renditions include that of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann from Argentina to Israel, and terrorist Carlos ‘the Jackal’ (Ilich Ramirez Sanchez) from Sudan to France. Although such renditions have been controversial in human rights circles, they have been celebrated by many as crucial in the fight against impunity for grave crimes and are sometimes called ‘rendition to justice’.",
    author = "Satterthwaite, {Margaret L.}",
    year = "2011",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139178907.020",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9781139178907",
    pages = "589--638",
    booktitle = "Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - The legal regime governing transfer of persons in the fight against terrorism

    AU - Satterthwaite, Margaret L.

    PY - 2011/1/1

    Y1 - 2011/1/1

    N2 - Introduction: Crimes of terrorism are frequently committed by individuals and groups in countries other than those they target. Even when ‘home-grown’ terrorists are responsible for violent acts, they often flee across borders to evade justice. States seeking to punish acts of terrorism therefore regularly need to obtain custody of individuals accused of committing such acts. They may do so by requesting the extradition or deportation of a suspect from a state where the individual is found. States also directly apprehend suspected terrorists in other countries and deliver them to justice before their own or third states’ courts through ‘rendition to justice’. Finally, when terrorism occurs in the context of armed conflict, states may move suspects from one state to another through wartime processes such as the transfer of prisoners of war. In short, states use both formal and informal processes when transferring individuals suspected of terrorist crimes. The practice of rendition - the involuntary transfer of an individual across borders without recourse to extradition or deportation proceedings - is not new. Indeed, the practice has been used by governments for more than a century. Famous renditions include that of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann from Argentina to Israel, and terrorist Carlos ‘the Jackal’ (Ilich Ramirez Sanchez) from Sudan to France. Although such renditions have been controversial in human rights circles, they have been celebrated by many as crucial in the fight against impunity for grave crimes and are sometimes called ‘rendition to justice’.

    AB - Introduction: Crimes of terrorism are frequently committed by individuals and groups in countries other than those they target. Even when ‘home-grown’ terrorists are responsible for violent acts, they often flee across borders to evade justice. States seeking to punish acts of terrorism therefore regularly need to obtain custody of individuals accused of committing such acts. They may do so by requesting the extradition or deportation of a suspect from a state where the individual is found. States also directly apprehend suspected terrorists in other countries and deliver them to justice before their own or third states’ courts through ‘rendition to justice’. Finally, when terrorism occurs in the context of armed conflict, states may move suspects from one state to another through wartime processes such as the transfer of prisoners of war. In short, states use both formal and informal processes when transferring individuals suspected of terrorist crimes. The practice of rendition - the involuntary transfer of an individual across borders without recourse to extradition or deportation proceedings - is not new. Indeed, the practice has been used by governments for more than a century. Famous renditions include that of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann from Argentina to Israel, and terrorist Carlos ‘the Jackal’ (Ilich Ramirez Sanchez) from Sudan to France. Although such renditions have been controversial in human rights circles, they have been celebrated by many as crucial in the fight against impunity for grave crimes and are sometimes called ‘rendition to justice’.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924215694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924215694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139178907.020

    DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139178907.020

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781139178907

    SN - 9781107025387

    SP - 589

    EP - 638

    BT - Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenges

    PB - Cambridge University Press

    ER -