The lateralization of speech-brain coupling is differentially modulated by intrinsic auditory and top-down mechanisms

M. F. Assaneo, J. M. Rimmele, J. Orpella, P. Ripollés, R. de Diego-Balaguer, David Poeppel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The lateralization of neuronal processing underpinning hearing, speech, language, and music is widely studied, vigorously debated, and still not understood in a satisfactory manner. One set of hypotheses focuses on the temporal structure of perceptual experience and links auditory cortex asymmetries to underlying differences in neural populations with differential temporal sensitivity (e.g., ideas advanced by Zatorre et al. (2002) and Poeppel (2003). The Asymmetric Sampling in Time theory (AST) (Poeppel, 2003), builds on cytoarchitectonic differences between auditory cortices and predicts that modulation frequencies within the range of, roughly, the syllable rate, are more accurately tracked by the right hemisphere. To date, this conjecture is reasonably well supported, since – while there is some heterogeneity in the reported findings – the predicted asymmetrical entrainment has been observed in various experimental protocols. Here, we show that under specific processing demands, the rightward dominance disappears. We propose an enriched and modified version of the asymmetric sampling hypothesis in the context of speech. Recent work (Rimmele et al., 2018b) proposes two different mechanisms to underlie the auditory tracking of the speech envelope: one derived from the intrinsic oscillatory properties of auditory regions; the other induced by top-down signals coming from other non-auditory regions of the brain. We propose that under non-speech listening conditions, the intrinsic auditory mechanism dominates and thus, in line with AST, entrainment is rightward lateralized, as is widely observed. However, (i) depending on individual brain structural/functional differences, and/or (ii) in the context of specific speech listening conditions, the relative weight of the top-down mechanism can increase. In this scenario, the typically observed auditory sampling asymmetry (and its rightward dominance) diminishes or vanishes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number28
JournalFrontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 5 2019

Fingerprint

Auditory Cortex
Brain
Music
Hearing
Language
Weights and Measures
Population

Keywords

  • Asymmetrical sampling
  • Brain to stimulus synchronization
  • MEG (magnetoencephalography)
  • Speech envelope tracking
  • Speech perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

The lateralization of speech-brain coupling is differentially modulated by intrinsic auditory and top-down mechanisms. / Assaneo, M. F.; Rimmele, J. M.; Orpella, J.; Ripollés, P.; de Diego-Balaguer, R.; Poeppel, David.

In: Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, Vol. 13, 28, 05.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{210f4105d3aa4f5a8ce9bad1e56e4ea0,
title = "The lateralization of speech-brain coupling is differentially modulated by intrinsic auditory and top-down mechanisms",
abstract = "The lateralization of neuronal processing underpinning hearing, speech, language, and music is widely studied, vigorously debated, and still not understood in a satisfactory manner. One set of hypotheses focuses on the temporal structure of perceptual experience and links auditory cortex asymmetries to underlying differences in neural populations with differential temporal sensitivity (e.g., ideas advanced by Zatorre et al. (2002) and Poeppel (2003). The Asymmetric Sampling in Time theory (AST) (Poeppel, 2003), builds on cytoarchitectonic differences between auditory cortices and predicts that modulation frequencies within the range of, roughly, the syllable rate, are more accurately tracked by the right hemisphere. To date, this conjecture is reasonably well supported, since – while there is some heterogeneity in the reported findings – the predicted asymmetrical entrainment has been observed in various experimental protocols. Here, we show that under specific processing demands, the rightward dominance disappears. We propose an enriched and modified version of the asymmetric sampling hypothesis in the context of speech. Recent work (Rimmele et al., 2018b) proposes two different mechanisms to underlie the auditory tracking of the speech envelope: one derived from the intrinsic oscillatory properties of auditory regions; the other induced by top-down signals coming from other non-auditory regions of the brain. We propose that under non-speech listening conditions, the intrinsic auditory mechanism dominates and thus, in line with AST, entrainment is rightward lateralized, as is widely observed. However, (i) depending on individual brain structural/functional differences, and/or (ii) in the context of specific speech listening conditions, the relative weight of the top-down mechanism can increase. In this scenario, the typically observed auditory sampling asymmetry (and its rightward dominance) diminishes or vanishes.",
keywords = "Asymmetrical sampling, Brain to stimulus synchronization, MEG (magnetoencephalography), Speech envelope tracking, Speech perception",
author = "Assaneo, {M. F.} and Rimmele, {J. M.} and J. Orpella and P. Ripoll{\'e}s and {de Diego-Balaguer}, R. and David Poeppel",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.3389/fnint.2019.00028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5145",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The lateralization of speech-brain coupling is differentially modulated by intrinsic auditory and top-down mechanisms

AU - Assaneo, M. F.

AU - Rimmele, J. M.

AU - Orpella, J.

AU - Ripollés, P.

AU - de Diego-Balaguer, R.

AU - Poeppel, David

PY - 2019/7/5

Y1 - 2019/7/5

N2 - The lateralization of neuronal processing underpinning hearing, speech, language, and music is widely studied, vigorously debated, and still not understood in a satisfactory manner. One set of hypotheses focuses on the temporal structure of perceptual experience and links auditory cortex asymmetries to underlying differences in neural populations with differential temporal sensitivity (e.g., ideas advanced by Zatorre et al. (2002) and Poeppel (2003). The Asymmetric Sampling in Time theory (AST) (Poeppel, 2003), builds on cytoarchitectonic differences between auditory cortices and predicts that modulation frequencies within the range of, roughly, the syllable rate, are more accurately tracked by the right hemisphere. To date, this conjecture is reasonably well supported, since – while there is some heterogeneity in the reported findings – the predicted asymmetrical entrainment has been observed in various experimental protocols. Here, we show that under specific processing demands, the rightward dominance disappears. We propose an enriched and modified version of the asymmetric sampling hypothesis in the context of speech. Recent work (Rimmele et al., 2018b) proposes two different mechanisms to underlie the auditory tracking of the speech envelope: one derived from the intrinsic oscillatory properties of auditory regions; the other induced by top-down signals coming from other non-auditory regions of the brain. We propose that under non-speech listening conditions, the intrinsic auditory mechanism dominates and thus, in line with AST, entrainment is rightward lateralized, as is widely observed. However, (i) depending on individual brain structural/functional differences, and/or (ii) in the context of specific speech listening conditions, the relative weight of the top-down mechanism can increase. In this scenario, the typically observed auditory sampling asymmetry (and its rightward dominance) diminishes or vanishes.

AB - The lateralization of neuronal processing underpinning hearing, speech, language, and music is widely studied, vigorously debated, and still not understood in a satisfactory manner. One set of hypotheses focuses on the temporal structure of perceptual experience and links auditory cortex asymmetries to underlying differences in neural populations with differential temporal sensitivity (e.g., ideas advanced by Zatorre et al. (2002) and Poeppel (2003). The Asymmetric Sampling in Time theory (AST) (Poeppel, 2003), builds on cytoarchitectonic differences between auditory cortices and predicts that modulation frequencies within the range of, roughly, the syllable rate, are more accurately tracked by the right hemisphere. To date, this conjecture is reasonably well supported, since – while there is some heterogeneity in the reported findings – the predicted asymmetrical entrainment has been observed in various experimental protocols. Here, we show that under specific processing demands, the rightward dominance disappears. We propose an enriched and modified version of the asymmetric sampling hypothesis in the context of speech. Recent work (Rimmele et al., 2018b) proposes two different mechanisms to underlie the auditory tracking of the speech envelope: one derived from the intrinsic oscillatory properties of auditory regions; the other induced by top-down signals coming from other non-auditory regions of the brain. We propose that under non-speech listening conditions, the intrinsic auditory mechanism dominates and thus, in line with AST, entrainment is rightward lateralized, as is widely observed. However, (i) depending on individual brain structural/functional differences, and/or (ii) in the context of specific speech listening conditions, the relative weight of the top-down mechanism can increase. In this scenario, the typically observed auditory sampling asymmetry (and its rightward dominance) diminishes or vanishes.

KW - Asymmetrical sampling

KW - Brain to stimulus synchronization

KW - MEG (magnetoencephalography)

KW - Speech envelope tracking

KW - Speech perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070733964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070733964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnint.2019.00028

DO - 10.3389/fnint.2019.00028

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5145

M1 - 28

ER -