The ladies vanish? American sociology and the genealogy of its missing women on wikipedia

Wei Luo, Julia Adams, Hannah Brückner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many notable female sociologists have vanished from the canonical history of American sociology. As the most influential crowd-sourced encyclopedia, Wikipedia promises – but does not necessarily deliver – a democratic corrective to the generation of knowledge, including academic knowledge. This article explores multiple mechanisms by which women either enter or disappear from the disciplinary record by analyzing the unfolding interaction between the canonical disciplinary history of sociology and Wikipedia. We argue that the uneven representation of women sociologists as (1) remembered, (2) neglected, (3) erased or, finally, (4) recovered is shaped by the emerging interactional space of knowledge production.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-556
Number of pages38
JournalComparative Sociology
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Wikipedia
genealogy
sociologist
sociology
history of sociology
knowledge production
history
interaction
knowledge

Keywords

  • Big data
  • Canon
  • Disciplinary memory
  • Encyclopedia
  • Gender
  • Knowledge
  • Sociology
  • Wikipedia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The ladies vanish? American sociology and the genealogy of its missing women on wikipedia. / Luo, Wei; Adams, Julia; Brückner, Hannah.

In: Comparative Sociology, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.01.2018, p. 519-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{80e65b5713d94f2cae8e63d6c259e1c7,
title = "The ladies vanish?: American sociology and the genealogy of its missing women on wikipedia",
abstract = "Many notable female sociologists have vanished from the canonical history of American sociology. As the most influential crowd-sourced encyclopedia, Wikipedia promises – but does not necessarily deliver – a democratic corrective to the generation of knowledge, including academic knowledge. This article explores multiple mechanisms by which women either enter or disappear from the disciplinary record by analyzing the unfolding interaction between the canonical disciplinary history of sociology and Wikipedia. We argue that the uneven representation of women sociologists as (1) remembered, (2) neglected, (3) erased or, finally, (4) recovered is shaped by the emerging interactional space of knowledge production.",
keywords = "Big data, Canon, Disciplinary memory, Encyclopedia, Gender, Knowledge, Sociology, Wikipedia",
author = "Wei Luo and Julia Adams and Hannah Br{\"u}ckner",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/15691330-12341471",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "519--556",
journal = "Comparative Sociology",
issn = "1569-1322",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ladies vanish?

T2 - American sociology and the genealogy of its missing women on wikipedia

AU - Luo, Wei

AU - Adams, Julia

AU - Brückner, Hannah

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Many notable female sociologists have vanished from the canonical history of American sociology. As the most influential crowd-sourced encyclopedia, Wikipedia promises – but does not necessarily deliver – a democratic corrective to the generation of knowledge, including academic knowledge. This article explores multiple mechanisms by which women either enter or disappear from the disciplinary record by analyzing the unfolding interaction between the canonical disciplinary history of sociology and Wikipedia. We argue that the uneven representation of women sociologists as (1) remembered, (2) neglected, (3) erased or, finally, (4) recovered is shaped by the emerging interactional space of knowledge production.

AB - Many notable female sociologists have vanished from the canonical history of American sociology. As the most influential crowd-sourced encyclopedia, Wikipedia promises – but does not necessarily deliver – a democratic corrective to the generation of knowledge, including academic knowledge. This article explores multiple mechanisms by which women either enter or disappear from the disciplinary record by analyzing the unfolding interaction between the canonical disciplinary history of sociology and Wikipedia. We argue that the uneven representation of women sociologists as (1) remembered, (2) neglected, (3) erased or, finally, (4) recovered is shaped by the emerging interactional space of knowledge production.

KW - Big data

KW - Canon

KW - Disciplinary memory

KW - Encyclopedia

KW - Gender

KW - Knowledge

KW - Sociology

KW - Wikipedia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053277823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053277823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15691330-12341471

DO - 10.1163/15691330-12341471

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053277823

VL - 17

SP - 519

EP - 556

JO - Comparative Sociology

JF - Comparative Sociology

SN - 1569-1322

IS - 5

ER -