The iterative reprocessing model: A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation

William A. Cunningham, Philip David Zelazo, Dominic J. Packer, Jay Van Bavel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Dual-process models of attitudes highlight the fact that evaluative processes are complex and multifaceted. Nevertheless, many of these models typically neglect important interactions among processes that can contribute to an evaluation. In this article, we propose a multilevel model informed by neuroscience in which current evaluations are constructed from relatively stable attitude representations through the iterative reprocessing of information. Whereas initial iterations provide relatively quick and dirty evaluations, additional iterations accompanied by reflective processes yield more nuanced evaluations and allow for phenomena such as ambivalence. Importantly, this model predicts that the processes underlying relatively automatic evaluations continue to be engaged across multiple iterations, and that they influence and are influenced by more reflective processes. We describe the Iterative Reprocessing Model at the computational, algorithmic, and implementational levels of analysis (Marr, 1982) to more fully characterize its premises and predictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)736-760
Number of pages25
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Neurosciences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The iterative reprocessing model : A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation. / Cunningham, William A.; Zelazo, Philip David; Packer, Dominic J.; Van Bavel, Jay.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 25, No. 5, 10.2007, p. 736-760.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cunningham, William A. ; Zelazo, Philip David ; Packer, Dominic J. ; Van Bavel, Jay. / The iterative reprocessing model : A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation. In: Social Cognition. 2007 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 736-760.
@article{387b5f970f274bbb8aa68df90ff68a8a,
title = "The iterative reprocessing model: A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation",
abstract = "Dual-process models of attitudes highlight the fact that evaluative processes are complex and multifaceted. Nevertheless, many of these models typically neglect important interactions among processes that can contribute to an evaluation. In this article, we propose a multilevel model informed by neuroscience in which current evaluations are constructed from relatively stable attitude representations through the iterative reprocessing of information. Whereas initial iterations provide relatively quick and dirty evaluations, additional iterations accompanied by reflective processes yield more nuanced evaluations and allow for phenomena such as ambivalence. Importantly, this model predicts that the processes underlying relatively automatic evaluations continue to be engaged across multiple iterations, and that they influence and are influenced by more reflective processes. We describe the Iterative Reprocessing Model at the computational, algorithmic, and implementational levels of analysis (Marr, 1982) to more fully characterize its premises and predictions.",
author = "Cunningham, {William A.} and Zelazo, {Philip David} and Packer, {Dominic J.} and {Van Bavel}, Jay",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.736",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "736--760",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The iterative reprocessing model

T2 - A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation

AU - Cunningham, William A.

AU - Zelazo, Philip David

AU - Packer, Dominic J.

AU - Van Bavel, Jay

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Dual-process models of attitudes highlight the fact that evaluative processes are complex and multifaceted. Nevertheless, many of these models typically neglect important interactions among processes that can contribute to an evaluation. In this article, we propose a multilevel model informed by neuroscience in which current evaluations are constructed from relatively stable attitude representations through the iterative reprocessing of information. Whereas initial iterations provide relatively quick and dirty evaluations, additional iterations accompanied by reflective processes yield more nuanced evaluations and allow for phenomena such as ambivalence. Importantly, this model predicts that the processes underlying relatively automatic evaluations continue to be engaged across multiple iterations, and that they influence and are influenced by more reflective processes. We describe the Iterative Reprocessing Model at the computational, algorithmic, and implementational levels of analysis (Marr, 1982) to more fully characterize its premises and predictions.

AB - Dual-process models of attitudes highlight the fact that evaluative processes are complex and multifaceted. Nevertheless, many of these models typically neglect important interactions among processes that can contribute to an evaluation. In this article, we propose a multilevel model informed by neuroscience in which current evaluations are constructed from relatively stable attitude representations through the iterative reprocessing of information. Whereas initial iterations provide relatively quick and dirty evaluations, additional iterations accompanied by reflective processes yield more nuanced evaluations and allow for phenomena such as ambivalence. Importantly, this model predicts that the processes underlying relatively automatic evaluations continue to be engaged across multiple iterations, and that they influence and are influenced by more reflective processes. We describe the Iterative Reprocessing Model at the computational, algorithmic, and implementational levels of analysis (Marr, 1982) to more fully characterize its premises and predictions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36148954264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36148954264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.736

DO - 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.736

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 736

EP - 760

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 5

ER -