The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions

Paschal Sheeran, Thomas L. Webb, Peter Gollwitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two studies tested whether action control by implementation intentions is sensitive to the activation and strength of participants' underlying goal intentions. In Study 1, participants formed implementation intentions (or did not) and their goal intentions were measured. Findings revealed a significant interaction between implementation intentions and the strength of respective goal intentions. Implementation intentions benefited the rate of goal attainment when participants had strong goal intentions but not when goal intentions were weak. Study 2 activated either a task-relevant or a neutral goal outside of participants' conscious awareness and found that implementation intentions affected performance only when the relevant goal had been activated. These findings indicate that the rate of goal attainment engendered by implementation intentions takes account of the state (strength, activation) of people's superordinate goal intentions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-98
Number of pages12
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Keywords

  • Automatic
  • Goals
  • Implementation intentions
  • Self-control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. / Sheeran, Paschal; Webb, Thomas L.; Gollwitzer, Peter.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 87-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{777b805ddae54d3b9e6ad5282aa2e690,
title = "The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions",
abstract = "Two studies tested whether action control by implementation intentions is sensitive to the activation and strength of participants' underlying goal intentions. In Study 1, participants formed implementation intentions (or did not) and their goal intentions were measured. Findings revealed a significant interaction between implementation intentions and the strength of respective goal intentions. Implementation intentions benefited the rate of goal attainment when participants had strong goal intentions but not when goal intentions were weak. Study 2 activated either a task-relevant or a neutral goal outside of participants' conscious awareness and found that implementation intentions affected performance only when the relevant goal had been activated. These findings indicate that the rate of goal attainment engendered by implementation intentions takes account of the state (strength, activation) of people's superordinate goal intentions.",
keywords = "Automatic, Goals, Implementation intentions, Self-control",
author = "Paschal Sheeran and Webb, {Thomas L.} and Peter Gollwitzer",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167204271308",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "87--98",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions

AU - Sheeran, Paschal

AU - Webb, Thomas L.

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Two studies tested whether action control by implementation intentions is sensitive to the activation and strength of participants' underlying goal intentions. In Study 1, participants formed implementation intentions (or did not) and their goal intentions were measured. Findings revealed a significant interaction between implementation intentions and the strength of respective goal intentions. Implementation intentions benefited the rate of goal attainment when participants had strong goal intentions but not when goal intentions were weak. Study 2 activated either a task-relevant or a neutral goal outside of participants' conscious awareness and found that implementation intentions affected performance only when the relevant goal had been activated. These findings indicate that the rate of goal attainment engendered by implementation intentions takes account of the state (strength, activation) of people's superordinate goal intentions.

AB - Two studies tested whether action control by implementation intentions is sensitive to the activation and strength of participants' underlying goal intentions. In Study 1, participants formed implementation intentions (or did not) and their goal intentions were measured. Findings revealed a significant interaction between implementation intentions and the strength of respective goal intentions. Implementation intentions benefited the rate of goal attainment when participants had strong goal intentions but not when goal intentions were weak. Study 2 activated either a task-relevant or a neutral goal outside of participants' conscious awareness and found that implementation intentions affected performance only when the relevant goal had been activated. These findings indicate that the rate of goal attainment engendered by implementation intentions takes account of the state (strength, activation) of people's superordinate goal intentions.

KW - Automatic

KW - Goals

KW - Implementation intentions

KW - Self-control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11144323174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11144323174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167204271308

DO - 10.1177/0146167204271308

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 87

EP - 98

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 1

ER -