The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities

Mark Vardy, Michael Oppenheimer, Navroz K. Dubash, Jessica O'Reilly, Dale Jamieson

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) conducts policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive assessments of climate science. In this review, we engage with some of the key design features, achievements, and challenges that situate and characterize the IPCC as an intergovernmental organization that is tasked with producing global environmental assessments (GEAs). These include the process of working through consensus to assess and summarize climate science and the need to include knowledge from as many of the 195 IPCC nation-states as possible, despite the structural inequalities between developed and developing countries. To highlight salient features that are unique to the IPCC but that offer lessons for other organizations that conduct GEAs, we include case studies on the politics of climate denialism, the use of geoengineering in mitigation scenarios, and the links between adaptive capacity, adaptation, and global development. We conclude with a discussion of institutional reflexivity. We consider how the IPCC can model an ethical and participatory response to climate change by critically examining, and being transparent about, the relation between science and politics.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)55-75
    Number of pages21
    JournalAnnual Review of Environment and Resources
    Volume42
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 17 2017

    Fingerprint

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
    environmental assessment
    climate
    politics
    nation state
    mitigation
    developing world
    climate change
    science
    policy

    Keywords

    • Climate change
    • Climate politics
    • Global environmental assessment
    • IPCC
    • Reflexivity
    • Transparency
    • Uncertainty

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Science(all)

    Cite this

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change : Challenges and Opportunities. / Vardy, Mark; Oppenheimer, Michael; Dubash, Navroz K.; O'Reilly, Jessica; Jamieson, Dale.

    In: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 42, 17.10.2017, p. 55-75.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Vardy, Mark ; Oppenheimer, Michael ; Dubash, Navroz K. ; O'Reilly, Jessica ; Jamieson, Dale. / The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change : Challenges and Opportunities. In: Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2017 ; Vol. 42. pp. 55-75.
    @article{4b5c03c318534259ad7b94bf156ef87b,
    title = "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities",
    abstract = "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) conducts policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive assessments of climate science. In this review, we engage with some of the key design features, achievements, and challenges that situate and characterize the IPCC as an intergovernmental organization that is tasked with producing global environmental assessments (GEAs). These include the process of working through consensus to assess and summarize climate science and the need to include knowledge from as many of the 195 IPCC nation-states as possible, despite the structural inequalities between developed and developing countries. To highlight salient features that are unique to the IPCC but that offer lessons for other organizations that conduct GEAs, we include case studies on the politics of climate denialism, the use of geoengineering in mitigation scenarios, and the links between adaptive capacity, adaptation, and global development. We conclude with a discussion of institutional reflexivity. We consider how the IPCC can model an ethical and participatory response to climate change by critically examining, and being transparent about, the relation between science and politics.",
    keywords = "Climate change, Climate politics, Global environmental assessment, IPCC, Reflexivity, Transparency, Uncertainty",
    author = "Mark Vardy and Michael Oppenheimer and Dubash, {Navroz K.} and Jessica O'Reilly and Dale Jamieson",
    year = "2017",
    month = "10",
    day = "17",
    doi = "10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061053",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "55--75",
    journal = "Annual Review of Environment and Resources",
    issn = "1543-5938",
    publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    T2 - Challenges and Opportunities

    AU - Vardy, Mark

    AU - Oppenheimer, Michael

    AU - Dubash, Navroz K.

    AU - O'Reilly, Jessica

    AU - Jamieson, Dale

    PY - 2017/10/17

    Y1 - 2017/10/17

    N2 - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) conducts policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive assessments of climate science. In this review, we engage with some of the key design features, achievements, and challenges that situate and characterize the IPCC as an intergovernmental organization that is tasked with producing global environmental assessments (GEAs). These include the process of working through consensus to assess and summarize climate science and the need to include knowledge from as many of the 195 IPCC nation-states as possible, despite the structural inequalities between developed and developing countries. To highlight salient features that are unique to the IPCC but that offer lessons for other organizations that conduct GEAs, we include case studies on the politics of climate denialism, the use of geoengineering in mitigation scenarios, and the links between adaptive capacity, adaptation, and global development. We conclude with a discussion of institutional reflexivity. We consider how the IPCC can model an ethical and participatory response to climate change by critically examining, and being transparent about, the relation between science and politics.

    AB - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) conducts policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive assessments of climate science. In this review, we engage with some of the key design features, achievements, and challenges that situate and characterize the IPCC as an intergovernmental organization that is tasked with producing global environmental assessments (GEAs). These include the process of working through consensus to assess and summarize climate science and the need to include knowledge from as many of the 195 IPCC nation-states as possible, despite the structural inequalities between developed and developing countries. To highlight salient features that are unique to the IPCC but that offer lessons for other organizations that conduct GEAs, we include case studies on the politics of climate denialism, the use of geoengineering in mitigation scenarios, and the links between adaptive capacity, adaptation, and global development. We conclude with a discussion of institutional reflexivity. We consider how the IPCC can model an ethical and participatory response to climate change by critically examining, and being transparent about, the relation between science and politics.

    KW - Climate change

    KW - Climate politics

    KW - Global environmental assessment

    KW - IPCC

    KW - Reflexivity

    KW - Transparency

    KW - Uncertainty

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031734519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031734519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061053

    DO - 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061053

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 42

    SP - 55

    EP - 75

    JO - Annual Review of Environment and Resources

    JF - Annual Review of Environment and Resources

    SN - 1543-5938

    ER -