The inherence heuristic across development

Systematic differences between children's and adults' explanations for everyday facts

Andrei Cimpian, Olivia D. Steinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The inherence heuristic is a basic cognitive process that supplies quick-and-easy answers to what are, in reality, incredibly complex questions about why the broad patterns of the world are as they are ( Cimpian & Salomon, 2014-a, 2014-b). This explanatory heuristic satisfies the human need to understand, but it is also a source of bias because the heuristic relies too often on the (easily accessible) inherent features of the entities in the patterns being explained. Here, we investigated the developmental trajectory of this heuristic. Given that the cognitive resources that help override the typical output of the inherence heuristic are scarce in childhood, we hypothesized that the heuristic's output would be more broadly endorsed by children than by adults. Five experiments involving young children and adults ( N= 480) provided consistent support for this hypothesis. The first three experiments (Part I) investigated participants' explanations for broad patterns (e.g., fire trucks are red) and suggested that, consistent with our predictions, children were particularly likely to endorse inherence-based explanations. The last two experiments (Part II) investigated two intuitions that accompany the output of the inherence heuristic: namely, that the patterns being explained cannot be changed and are temporally stable. As predicted, participants' judgments on these dimensions showed the same developmental differences as the explanations investigated in Part I, with children being particularly likely to see patterns as inalterable and temporally stable. The developmental differences found across these five experiments suggest that children start out with a broad reliance on the explanatory output of the inherence heuristic, a reliance that narrows in scope to some extent as children develop.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)130-154
Number of pages25
JournalCognitive Psychology
Volume75
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

heuristics
Experiments
experiment
Trucks
Fires
Trajectories
Intuition
Heuristics
Motor Vehicles
intuition
Young Adult
childhood
trend
resources

Keywords

  • Concepts
  • Development
  • Explanation
  • Inherence heuristic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

The inherence heuristic across development : Systematic differences between children's and adults' explanations for everyday facts. / Cimpian, Andrei; Steinberg, Olivia D.

In: Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 75, 01.12.2014, p. 130-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b894bba33cb14be1b36bbf8e6ebfc939,
title = "The inherence heuristic across development: Systematic differences between children's and adults' explanations for everyday facts",
abstract = "The inherence heuristic is a basic cognitive process that supplies quick-and-easy answers to what are, in reality, incredibly complex questions about why the broad patterns of the world are as they are ( Cimpian & Salomon, 2014-a, 2014-b). This explanatory heuristic satisfies the human need to understand, but it is also a source of bias because the heuristic relies too often on the (easily accessible) inherent features of the entities in the patterns being explained. Here, we investigated the developmental trajectory of this heuristic. Given that the cognitive resources that help override the typical output of the inherence heuristic are scarce in childhood, we hypothesized that the heuristic's output would be more broadly endorsed by children than by adults. Five experiments involving young children and adults ( N= 480) provided consistent support for this hypothesis. The first three experiments (Part I) investigated participants' explanations for broad patterns (e.g., fire trucks are red) and suggested that, consistent with our predictions, children were particularly likely to endorse inherence-based explanations. The last two experiments (Part II) investigated two intuitions that accompany the output of the inherence heuristic: namely, that the patterns being explained cannot be changed and are temporally stable. As predicted, participants' judgments on these dimensions showed the same developmental differences as the explanations investigated in Part I, with children being particularly likely to see patterns as inalterable and temporally stable. The developmental differences found across these five experiments suggest that children start out with a broad reliance on the explanatory output of the inherence heuristic, a reliance that narrows in scope to some extent as children develop.",
keywords = "Concepts, Development, Explanation, Inherence heuristic",
author = "Andrei Cimpian and Steinberg, {Olivia D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "130--154",
journal = "Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0010-0285",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The inherence heuristic across development

T2 - Systematic differences between children's and adults' explanations for everyday facts

AU - Cimpian, Andrei

AU - Steinberg, Olivia D.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - The inherence heuristic is a basic cognitive process that supplies quick-and-easy answers to what are, in reality, incredibly complex questions about why the broad patterns of the world are as they are ( Cimpian & Salomon, 2014-a, 2014-b). This explanatory heuristic satisfies the human need to understand, but it is also a source of bias because the heuristic relies too often on the (easily accessible) inherent features of the entities in the patterns being explained. Here, we investigated the developmental trajectory of this heuristic. Given that the cognitive resources that help override the typical output of the inherence heuristic are scarce in childhood, we hypothesized that the heuristic's output would be more broadly endorsed by children than by adults. Five experiments involving young children and adults ( N= 480) provided consistent support for this hypothesis. The first three experiments (Part I) investigated participants' explanations for broad patterns (e.g., fire trucks are red) and suggested that, consistent with our predictions, children were particularly likely to endorse inherence-based explanations. The last two experiments (Part II) investigated two intuitions that accompany the output of the inherence heuristic: namely, that the patterns being explained cannot be changed and are temporally stable. As predicted, participants' judgments on these dimensions showed the same developmental differences as the explanations investigated in Part I, with children being particularly likely to see patterns as inalterable and temporally stable. The developmental differences found across these five experiments suggest that children start out with a broad reliance on the explanatory output of the inherence heuristic, a reliance that narrows in scope to some extent as children develop.

AB - The inherence heuristic is a basic cognitive process that supplies quick-and-easy answers to what are, in reality, incredibly complex questions about why the broad patterns of the world are as they are ( Cimpian & Salomon, 2014-a, 2014-b). This explanatory heuristic satisfies the human need to understand, but it is also a source of bias because the heuristic relies too often on the (easily accessible) inherent features of the entities in the patterns being explained. Here, we investigated the developmental trajectory of this heuristic. Given that the cognitive resources that help override the typical output of the inherence heuristic are scarce in childhood, we hypothesized that the heuristic's output would be more broadly endorsed by children than by adults. Five experiments involving young children and adults ( N= 480) provided consistent support for this hypothesis. The first three experiments (Part I) investigated participants' explanations for broad patterns (e.g., fire trucks are red) and suggested that, consistent with our predictions, children were particularly likely to endorse inherence-based explanations. The last two experiments (Part II) investigated two intuitions that accompany the output of the inherence heuristic: namely, that the patterns being explained cannot be changed and are temporally stable. As predicted, participants' judgments on these dimensions showed the same developmental differences as the explanations investigated in Part I, with children being particularly likely to see patterns as inalterable and temporally stable. The developmental differences found across these five experiments suggest that children start out with a broad reliance on the explanatory output of the inherence heuristic, a reliance that narrows in scope to some extent as children develop.

KW - Concepts

KW - Development

KW - Explanation

KW - Inherence heuristic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910090172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910090172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 130

EP - 154

JO - Cognitive Psychology

JF - Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0010-0285

ER -