The information about age, gender, and genetic relatedness contained in ratings of facial similarity

Maria F. Dal Martello, Laurence T. Maloney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Suppose that you are told that two children - whom you have never seen - are very similar in appearance. Do you now imagine that they are more likely to be siblings? More likely to be close in age? More likely to be the same gender? What objective information about age, gender, and genetic relatedness is conveyed by a rating of similarity? We asked observers to rate the facial similarity of pairs of children depicted in photographs. Observers were not instructed to consider the ages, genders, or possible relatedness of the children: they were told only to rate facial similarity. We estimated the Shannon information ("bits") about relatedness, age difference, and gender difference contained in these ratings of facial similarity. The stimuli were 48 pairs of color photographs of children (3 to 12 years of age) from two provinces of northern Italy. Each photograph depicted the child from the shoulders to the top of the head with his or her face clearly visible. Half of the 96 children were male, and half female. In half of the pairs, the children were siblings, in the other half, the children were not related. Age difference, gender difference, and relatedness were counterbalanced across the pairs. Thirty observers rated the similarity of the 48 pairs on a scale of 0 to 10. The maximum possible Shannon information that can be conveyed concerning a binary choice is 1 bit. The estimated Shannon information conveyed by a similarity rating was 0.171 bits (relatedness), 0.091 (gender difference), and 0.015 (age difference). The first two values are significantly greater than 0 (p < 0.0001 for each), while the third is not (p > 0.05). We conclude that the observers incorporate information about relatedness and gender difference into their ratings, but include little information relevant to age difference. In particular, the observers discounted the large physical changes in appearance that occur as children grow in forming a judgment of facial similarity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of vision
Volume2
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Siblings
Italy
Color
Head

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The information about age, gender, and genetic relatedness contained in ratings of facial similarity. / Dal Martello, Maria F.; Maloney, Laurence T.

In: Journal of vision, Vol. 2, No. 7, 2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{004049f698154e8f97430c5b82181918,
title = "The information about age, gender, and genetic relatedness contained in ratings of facial similarity",
abstract = "Suppose that you are told that two children - whom you have never seen - are very similar in appearance. Do you now imagine that they are more likely to be siblings? More likely to be close in age? More likely to be the same gender? What objective information about age, gender, and genetic relatedness is conveyed by a rating of similarity? We asked observers to rate the facial similarity of pairs of children depicted in photographs. Observers were not instructed to consider the ages, genders, or possible relatedness of the children: they were told only to rate facial similarity. We estimated the Shannon information ({"}bits{"}) about relatedness, age difference, and gender difference contained in these ratings of facial similarity. The stimuli were 48 pairs of color photographs of children (3 to 12 years of age) from two provinces of northern Italy. Each photograph depicted the child from the shoulders to the top of the head with his or her face clearly visible. Half of the 96 children were male, and half female. In half of the pairs, the children were siblings, in the other half, the children were not related. Age difference, gender difference, and relatedness were counterbalanced across the pairs. Thirty observers rated the similarity of the 48 pairs on a scale of 0 to 10. The maximum possible Shannon information that can be conveyed concerning a binary choice is 1 bit. The estimated Shannon information conveyed by a similarity rating was 0.171 bits (relatedness), 0.091 (gender difference), and 0.015 (age difference). The first two values are significantly greater than 0 (p < 0.0001 for each), while the third is not (p > 0.05). We conclude that the observers incorporate information about relatedness and gender difference into their ratings, but include little information relevant to age difference. In particular, the observers discounted the large physical changes in appearance that occur as children grow in forming a judgment of facial similarity.",
author = "{Dal Martello}, {Maria F.} and Maloney, {Laurence T.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1167/2.7.619",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "Journal of vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The information about age, gender, and genetic relatedness contained in ratings of facial similarity

AU - Dal Martello, Maria F.

AU - Maloney, Laurence T.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Suppose that you are told that two children - whom you have never seen - are very similar in appearance. Do you now imagine that they are more likely to be siblings? More likely to be close in age? More likely to be the same gender? What objective information about age, gender, and genetic relatedness is conveyed by a rating of similarity? We asked observers to rate the facial similarity of pairs of children depicted in photographs. Observers were not instructed to consider the ages, genders, or possible relatedness of the children: they were told only to rate facial similarity. We estimated the Shannon information ("bits") about relatedness, age difference, and gender difference contained in these ratings of facial similarity. The stimuli were 48 pairs of color photographs of children (3 to 12 years of age) from two provinces of northern Italy. Each photograph depicted the child from the shoulders to the top of the head with his or her face clearly visible. Half of the 96 children were male, and half female. In half of the pairs, the children were siblings, in the other half, the children were not related. Age difference, gender difference, and relatedness were counterbalanced across the pairs. Thirty observers rated the similarity of the 48 pairs on a scale of 0 to 10. The maximum possible Shannon information that can be conveyed concerning a binary choice is 1 bit. The estimated Shannon information conveyed by a similarity rating was 0.171 bits (relatedness), 0.091 (gender difference), and 0.015 (age difference). The first two values are significantly greater than 0 (p < 0.0001 for each), while the third is not (p > 0.05). We conclude that the observers incorporate information about relatedness and gender difference into their ratings, but include little information relevant to age difference. In particular, the observers discounted the large physical changes in appearance that occur as children grow in forming a judgment of facial similarity.

AB - Suppose that you are told that two children - whom you have never seen - are very similar in appearance. Do you now imagine that they are more likely to be siblings? More likely to be close in age? More likely to be the same gender? What objective information about age, gender, and genetic relatedness is conveyed by a rating of similarity? We asked observers to rate the facial similarity of pairs of children depicted in photographs. Observers were not instructed to consider the ages, genders, or possible relatedness of the children: they were told only to rate facial similarity. We estimated the Shannon information ("bits") about relatedness, age difference, and gender difference contained in these ratings of facial similarity. The stimuli were 48 pairs of color photographs of children (3 to 12 years of age) from two provinces of northern Italy. Each photograph depicted the child from the shoulders to the top of the head with his or her face clearly visible. Half of the 96 children were male, and half female. In half of the pairs, the children were siblings, in the other half, the children were not related. Age difference, gender difference, and relatedness were counterbalanced across the pairs. Thirty observers rated the similarity of the 48 pairs on a scale of 0 to 10. The maximum possible Shannon information that can be conveyed concerning a binary choice is 1 bit. The estimated Shannon information conveyed by a similarity rating was 0.171 bits (relatedness), 0.091 (gender difference), and 0.015 (age difference). The first two values are significantly greater than 0 (p < 0.0001 for each), while the third is not (p > 0.05). We conclude that the observers incorporate information about relatedness and gender difference into their ratings, but include little information relevant to age difference. In particular, the observers discounted the large physical changes in appearance that occur as children grow in forming a judgment of facial similarity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243121668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243121668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/2.7.619

DO - 10.1167/2.7.619

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - Journal of vision

JF - Journal of vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 7

ER -