The influence of fiscal rules on healthcare policy in the United States and the Netherlands

H. Christiaan Schakel, Patrick Jeurissen, Sharon Glied

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Governments use fiscal rules to put a framework and limits on how budgetary challenges are addressed, but the rules themselves are still an understudied area among health policy scholars. For a long time, healthcare held a somewhat separate status because of the reliance on entitlements and dedicated revenue streams. However, the combined forces of advocates for integral decision-making, central budget control and the increasing costs might shift healthcare towards budgetary frameworks that currently apply to other spending categories. In this paper, we study fiscal rules that the US and the Netherlands have adopted since 2010 and their impact on healthcare policy. Our analysis shows that fiscal rules can have an impact on the rationing of healthcare. In the studied timeframe, the rules seem to have more impact on budget outcomes than on the budget process itself. In addition, the convergence of fiscal and program policy objectives seems to be better accomplished in a budgetary system that applies enforceable budget ceilings. Budgeting for health entitlements requires a comprehensive and tailor-made approach and the composition of traditional rules might not fully answer to the complexities of healthcare policy. This paper aims to contribute to that debate and the way we think about healthcare budgeting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Health Planning and Management
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Netherlands
Budgets
Delivery of Health Care
Health Care Rationing
Cost Control
Health Policy
Decision Making
Health

Keywords

  • Budget rules
  • Comparative health systems
  • Fiscal rules
  • Health care budgeting
  • Medicare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

The influence of fiscal rules on healthcare policy in the United States and the Netherlands. / Schakel, H. Christiaan; Jeurissen, Patrick; Glied, Sharon.

In: International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b93815249d28495ba299ffa069a3a6f3,
title = "The influence of fiscal rules on healthcare policy in the United States and the Netherlands",
abstract = "Governments use fiscal rules to put a framework and limits on how budgetary challenges are addressed, but the rules themselves are still an understudied area among health policy scholars. For a long time, healthcare held a somewhat separate status because of the reliance on entitlements and dedicated revenue streams. However, the combined forces of advocates for integral decision-making, central budget control and the increasing costs might shift healthcare towards budgetary frameworks that currently apply to other spending categories. In this paper, we study fiscal rules that the US and the Netherlands have adopted since 2010 and their impact on healthcare policy. Our analysis shows that fiscal rules can have an impact on the rationing of healthcare. In the studied timeframe, the rules seem to have more impact on budget outcomes than on the budget process itself. In addition, the convergence of fiscal and program policy objectives seems to be better accomplished in a budgetary system that applies enforceable budget ceilings. Budgeting for health entitlements requires a comprehensive and tailor-made approach and the composition of traditional rules might not fully answer to the complexities of healthcare policy. This paper aims to contribute to that debate and the way we think about healthcare budgeting.",
keywords = "Budget rules, Comparative health systems, Fiscal rules, Health care budgeting, Medicare",
author = "Schakel, {H. Christiaan} and Patrick Jeurissen and Sharon Glied",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/hpm.2382",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Health Planning and Management",
issn = "0749-6753",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of fiscal rules on healthcare policy in the United States and the Netherlands

AU - Schakel, H. Christiaan

AU - Jeurissen, Patrick

AU - Glied, Sharon

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Governments use fiscal rules to put a framework and limits on how budgetary challenges are addressed, but the rules themselves are still an understudied area among health policy scholars. For a long time, healthcare held a somewhat separate status because of the reliance on entitlements and dedicated revenue streams. However, the combined forces of advocates for integral decision-making, central budget control and the increasing costs might shift healthcare towards budgetary frameworks that currently apply to other spending categories. In this paper, we study fiscal rules that the US and the Netherlands have adopted since 2010 and their impact on healthcare policy. Our analysis shows that fiscal rules can have an impact on the rationing of healthcare. In the studied timeframe, the rules seem to have more impact on budget outcomes than on the budget process itself. In addition, the convergence of fiscal and program policy objectives seems to be better accomplished in a budgetary system that applies enforceable budget ceilings. Budgeting for health entitlements requires a comprehensive and tailor-made approach and the composition of traditional rules might not fully answer to the complexities of healthcare policy. This paper aims to contribute to that debate and the way we think about healthcare budgeting.

AB - Governments use fiscal rules to put a framework and limits on how budgetary challenges are addressed, but the rules themselves are still an understudied area among health policy scholars. For a long time, healthcare held a somewhat separate status because of the reliance on entitlements and dedicated revenue streams. However, the combined forces of advocates for integral decision-making, central budget control and the increasing costs might shift healthcare towards budgetary frameworks that currently apply to other spending categories. In this paper, we study fiscal rules that the US and the Netherlands have adopted since 2010 and their impact on healthcare policy. Our analysis shows that fiscal rules can have an impact on the rationing of healthcare. In the studied timeframe, the rules seem to have more impact on budget outcomes than on the budget process itself. In addition, the convergence of fiscal and program policy objectives seems to be better accomplished in a budgetary system that applies enforceable budget ceilings. Budgeting for health entitlements requires a comprehensive and tailor-made approach and the composition of traditional rules might not fully answer to the complexities of healthcare policy. This paper aims to contribute to that debate and the way we think about healthcare budgeting.

KW - Budget rules

KW - Comparative health systems

KW - Fiscal rules

KW - Health care budgeting

KW - Medicare

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995407510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995407510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hpm.2382

DO - 10.1002/hpm.2382

M3 - Article

C2 - 27678005

AN - SCOPUS:84995407510

JO - International Journal of Health Planning and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Planning and Management

SN - 0749-6753

ER -