The implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based protocol to treat diabetic ketoacidosis

A quality improvement study

Kathryn J. Evans, Julie Thompson, Susan E. Spratt, Lillian F. Lien, Allison Vorderstrasse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This retrospective observational quality improvement study was conducted to determine whether an evidence-based protocol for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis improved patient outcomes in our academic medical center. This study evaluated fidelity of providers to the protocol, as well as time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis as measured by closure of the anion gap (AG). Other secondary outcomes included time to intravenous fluids, time to potassium replacement, and rates of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia. Two cohorts including historical (N = 41) and current (N = 37) were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the protocol. There were no differences between group demographics at baseline. After implementation of the protocol, 43.2% of patients were treated using full protocol fidelity, 21.6% were treated with partial fidelity, and 35.1% were not treated using the protocol. Although none of the outcomes reached statistical significance, patients in the current group who were treated with full protocol fidelity had an average time to AG closure that was 3 hr less than those who were not treated according to the protocol, and an average time to potassium replacement that was 2 hr less. When comparing the historical cohort with the patients treated with full protocol fidelity, there was improvement in protocol-treated patients in time to AG closure (2 hr), time to dextrose replacement (1.7 hr), and time to potassium replacement (2 hr). The rates of hypokalemia were improved with protocol treatment; 37.5% of protocol-treated patients had hypokalemia as opposed to 63.4% of those not treated according to protocol. Overall, despite the low fidelity in our institution, the protocol promoted evidence-based practice and patients treated according to the protocol had decreased time to treatment outcomes including quicker AG closure, improved intravenous fluids resuscitation, and more accurate and timely electrolyte correction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-198
Number of pages10
JournalAdvanced Emergency Nursing Journal
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Quality Improvement
Acid-Base Equilibrium
Hypokalemia
Potassium
Clinical Protocols
Evidence-Based Practice
Hypoglycemia
Resuscitation
Electrolytes
Demography
Glucose

Keywords

  • Diabetic ketoacidosis
  • DKA protocol
  • DKA treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Cite this

The implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based protocol to treat diabetic ketoacidosis : A quality improvement study. / Evans, Kathryn J.; Thompson, Julie; Spratt, Susan E.; Lien, Lillian F.; Vorderstrasse, Allison.

In: Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2014, p. 189-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5674937082f640b9bdecb72c539989c1,
title = "The implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based protocol to treat diabetic ketoacidosis: A quality improvement study",
abstract = "This retrospective observational quality improvement study was conducted to determine whether an evidence-based protocol for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis improved patient outcomes in our academic medical center. This study evaluated fidelity of providers to the protocol, as well as time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis as measured by closure of the anion gap (AG). Other secondary outcomes included time to intravenous fluids, time to potassium replacement, and rates of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia. Two cohorts including historical (N = 41) and current (N = 37) were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the protocol. There were no differences between group demographics at baseline. After implementation of the protocol, 43.2{\%} of patients were treated using full protocol fidelity, 21.6{\%} were treated with partial fidelity, and 35.1{\%} were not treated using the protocol. Although none of the outcomes reached statistical significance, patients in the current group who were treated with full protocol fidelity had an average time to AG closure that was 3 hr less than those who were not treated according to the protocol, and an average time to potassium replacement that was 2 hr less. When comparing the historical cohort with the patients treated with full protocol fidelity, there was improvement in protocol-treated patients in time to AG closure (2 hr), time to dextrose replacement (1.7 hr), and time to potassium replacement (2 hr). The rates of hypokalemia were improved with protocol treatment; 37.5{\%} of protocol-treated patients had hypokalemia as opposed to 63.4{\%} of those not treated according to protocol. Overall, despite the low fidelity in our institution, the protocol promoted evidence-based practice and patients treated according to the protocol had decreased time to treatment outcomes including quicker AG closure, improved intravenous fluids resuscitation, and more accurate and timely electrolyte correction.",
keywords = "Diabetic ketoacidosis, DKA protocol, DKA treatment",
author = "Evans, {Kathryn J.} and Julie Thompson and Spratt, {Susan E.} and Lien, {Lillian F.} and Allison Vorderstrasse",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/TME.0000000000000021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "189--198",
journal = "Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal",
issn = "1931-4485",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based protocol to treat diabetic ketoacidosis

T2 - A quality improvement study

AU - Evans, Kathryn J.

AU - Thompson, Julie

AU - Spratt, Susan E.

AU - Lien, Lillian F.

AU - Vorderstrasse, Allison

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This retrospective observational quality improvement study was conducted to determine whether an evidence-based protocol for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis improved patient outcomes in our academic medical center. This study evaluated fidelity of providers to the protocol, as well as time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis as measured by closure of the anion gap (AG). Other secondary outcomes included time to intravenous fluids, time to potassium replacement, and rates of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia. Two cohorts including historical (N = 41) and current (N = 37) were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the protocol. There were no differences between group demographics at baseline. After implementation of the protocol, 43.2% of patients were treated using full protocol fidelity, 21.6% were treated with partial fidelity, and 35.1% were not treated using the protocol. Although none of the outcomes reached statistical significance, patients in the current group who were treated with full protocol fidelity had an average time to AG closure that was 3 hr less than those who were not treated according to the protocol, and an average time to potassium replacement that was 2 hr less. When comparing the historical cohort with the patients treated with full protocol fidelity, there was improvement in protocol-treated patients in time to AG closure (2 hr), time to dextrose replacement (1.7 hr), and time to potassium replacement (2 hr). The rates of hypokalemia were improved with protocol treatment; 37.5% of protocol-treated patients had hypokalemia as opposed to 63.4% of those not treated according to protocol. Overall, despite the low fidelity in our institution, the protocol promoted evidence-based practice and patients treated according to the protocol had decreased time to treatment outcomes including quicker AG closure, improved intravenous fluids resuscitation, and more accurate and timely electrolyte correction.

AB - This retrospective observational quality improvement study was conducted to determine whether an evidence-based protocol for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis improved patient outcomes in our academic medical center. This study evaluated fidelity of providers to the protocol, as well as time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis as measured by closure of the anion gap (AG). Other secondary outcomes included time to intravenous fluids, time to potassium replacement, and rates of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia. Two cohorts including historical (N = 41) and current (N = 37) were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the protocol. There were no differences between group demographics at baseline. After implementation of the protocol, 43.2% of patients were treated using full protocol fidelity, 21.6% were treated with partial fidelity, and 35.1% were not treated using the protocol. Although none of the outcomes reached statistical significance, patients in the current group who were treated with full protocol fidelity had an average time to AG closure that was 3 hr less than those who were not treated according to the protocol, and an average time to potassium replacement that was 2 hr less. When comparing the historical cohort with the patients treated with full protocol fidelity, there was improvement in protocol-treated patients in time to AG closure (2 hr), time to dextrose replacement (1.7 hr), and time to potassium replacement (2 hr). The rates of hypokalemia were improved with protocol treatment; 37.5% of protocol-treated patients had hypokalemia as opposed to 63.4% of those not treated according to protocol. Overall, despite the low fidelity in our institution, the protocol promoted evidence-based practice and patients treated according to the protocol had decreased time to treatment outcomes including quicker AG closure, improved intravenous fluids resuscitation, and more accurate and timely electrolyte correction.

KW - Diabetic ketoacidosis

KW - DKA protocol

KW - DKA treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922393553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922393553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TME.0000000000000021

DO - 10.1097/TME.0000000000000021

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 189

EP - 198

JO - Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal

JF - Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal

SN - 1931-4485

IS - 2

ER -