The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy: A randomized, controlled study

Richard T. Griffey, Nicole Shin, Solita Jones, Nnenna Aginam, Maureen Gross, Yonitte Kinsella, Jennifer A. Williams, Christopher R. Carpenter, Melody Goodman, Kimberly A. Kaphingst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Recommended as a ‘universal precaution’ for improving provider–patient communication, teach-back has a limited evidence base. Discharge from the emergency department (ED) to home is an important high-risk transition of care with potential for miscommunication of critical information. We examined whether teach-back improves: comprehension and perceived comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among patients with limited health literacy (LHL) in the ED. Methods: We performed a randomized, controlled study among adult patients with LHL, randomized to teach-back or standard discharge instructions. Patients completed an audio-recorded structured interview evaluating comprehension and perceived comprehension of (1) diagnosis, (2) ED course, (3) post-ED care, and (4) reasons to return and satisfaction using four Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questions. Concordance with the medical record was rated using a five-level scale. We analyzed differences between groups using multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Results: Patients randomized to receive teach-back had higher comprehension of post-ED care areas: post-ED medication (P < 0.02), self-care (P < 0.03), and follow-up instructions (P < 0.0001), but no change in patient satisfaction or perceived comprehension. Conclusion: Teach-back appears to improve comprehension of post-ED care instructions but not satisfaction or perceived comprehension. Our data from a randomized, controlled study support the effectiveness of teach-back in a busy clinical setting. Further research is needed to test the utility and feasibility of teach-back for routine use including its impacts on distal outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10-21
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Communication in Healthcare
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
comprehension
Emergencies
Hospital Emergency Service
literacy
Health
instruction
health
Logistics
Emergency Medical Services
Communication
Teach-Back Communication
Patient Satisfaction
Universal Precautions
Patient Transfer
Self Care
Health Personnel
Medical Records
medication
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Emergency department
  • Health literacy
  • Intervention studies
  • Physician–patient relations
  • Teach-back communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy : A randomized, controlled study. / Griffey, Richard T.; Shin, Nicole; Jones, Solita; Aginam, Nnenna; Gross, Maureen; Kinsella, Yonitte; Williams, Jennifer A.; Carpenter, Christopher R.; Goodman, Melody; Kaphingst, Kimberly A.

In: Journal of Communication in Healthcare, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2015, p. 10-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Griffey, Richard T. ; Shin, Nicole ; Jones, Solita ; Aginam, Nnenna ; Gross, Maureen ; Kinsella, Yonitte ; Williams, Jennifer A. ; Carpenter, Christopher R. ; Goodman, Melody ; Kaphingst, Kimberly A. / The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy : A randomized, controlled study. In: Journal of Communication in Healthcare. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 10-21.
@article{b13978bba3704300af69e2a826a25c60,
title = "The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy: A randomized, controlled study",
abstract = "Objective: Recommended as a ‘universal precaution’ for improving provider–patient communication, teach-back has a limited evidence base. Discharge from the emergency department (ED) to home is an important high-risk transition of care with potential for miscommunication of critical information. We examined whether teach-back improves: comprehension and perceived comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among patients with limited health literacy (LHL) in the ED. Methods: We performed a randomized, controlled study among adult patients with LHL, randomized to teach-back or standard discharge instructions. Patients completed an audio-recorded structured interview evaluating comprehension and perceived comprehension of (1) diagnosis, (2) ED course, (3) post-ED care, and (4) reasons to return and satisfaction using four Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questions. Concordance with the medical record was rated using a five-level scale. We analyzed differences between groups using multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Results: Patients randomized to receive teach-back had higher comprehension of post-ED care areas: post-ED medication (P < 0.02), self-care (P < 0.03), and follow-up instructions (P < 0.0001), but no change in patient satisfaction or perceived comprehension. Conclusion: Teach-back appears to improve comprehension of post-ED care instructions but not satisfaction or perceived comprehension. Our data from a randomized, controlled study support the effectiveness of teach-back in a busy clinical setting. Further research is needed to test the utility and feasibility of teach-back for routine use including its impacts on distal outcomes.",
keywords = "Emergency department, Health literacy, Intervention studies, Physician–patient relations, Teach-back communication",
author = "Griffey, {Richard T.} and Nicole Shin and Solita Jones and Nnenna Aginam and Maureen Gross and Yonitte Kinsella and Williams, {Jennifer A.} and Carpenter, {Christopher R.} and Melody Goodman and Kaphingst, {Kimberly A.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "10--21",
journal = "Journal of Communication in Healthcare",
issn = "1753-8068",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy

T2 - A randomized, controlled study

AU - Griffey, Richard T.

AU - Shin, Nicole

AU - Jones, Solita

AU - Aginam, Nnenna

AU - Gross, Maureen

AU - Kinsella, Yonitte

AU - Williams, Jennifer A.

AU - Carpenter, Christopher R.

AU - Goodman, Melody

AU - Kaphingst, Kimberly A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objective: Recommended as a ‘universal precaution’ for improving provider–patient communication, teach-back has a limited evidence base. Discharge from the emergency department (ED) to home is an important high-risk transition of care with potential for miscommunication of critical information. We examined whether teach-back improves: comprehension and perceived comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among patients with limited health literacy (LHL) in the ED. Methods: We performed a randomized, controlled study among adult patients with LHL, randomized to teach-back or standard discharge instructions. Patients completed an audio-recorded structured interview evaluating comprehension and perceived comprehension of (1) diagnosis, (2) ED course, (3) post-ED care, and (4) reasons to return and satisfaction using four Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questions. Concordance with the medical record was rated using a five-level scale. We analyzed differences between groups using multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Results: Patients randomized to receive teach-back had higher comprehension of post-ED care areas: post-ED medication (P < 0.02), self-care (P < 0.03), and follow-up instructions (P < 0.0001), but no change in patient satisfaction or perceived comprehension. Conclusion: Teach-back appears to improve comprehension of post-ED care instructions but not satisfaction or perceived comprehension. Our data from a randomized, controlled study support the effectiveness of teach-back in a busy clinical setting. Further research is needed to test the utility and feasibility of teach-back for routine use including its impacts on distal outcomes.

AB - Objective: Recommended as a ‘universal precaution’ for improving provider–patient communication, teach-back has a limited evidence base. Discharge from the emergency department (ED) to home is an important high-risk transition of care with potential for miscommunication of critical information. We examined whether teach-back improves: comprehension and perceived comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among patients with limited health literacy (LHL) in the ED. Methods: We performed a randomized, controlled study among adult patients with LHL, randomized to teach-back or standard discharge instructions. Patients completed an audio-recorded structured interview evaluating comprehension and perceived comprehension of (1) diagnosis, (2) ED course, (3) post-ED care, and (4) reasons to return and satisfaction using four Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questions. Concordance with the medical record was rated using a five-level scale. We analyzed differences between groups using multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Results: Patients randomized to receive teach-back had higher comprehension of post-ED care areas: post-ED medication (P < 0.02), self-care (P < 0.03), and follow-up instructions (P < 0.0001), but no change in patient satisfaction or perceived comprehension. Conclusion: Teach-back appears to improve comprehension of post-ED care instructions but not satisfaction or perceived comprehension. Our data from a randomized, controlled study support the effectiveness of teach-back in a busy clinical setting. Further research is needed to test the utility and feasibility of teach-back for routine use including its impacts on distal outcomes.

KW - Emergency department

KW - Health literacy

KW - Intervention studies

KW - Physician–patient relations

KW - Teach-back communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926384782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926384782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000001

DO - 10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000001

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 10

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Communication in Healthcare

JF - Journal of Communication in Healthcare

SN - 1753-8068

IS - 1

ER -