The ideological divide and climate change opinion: "Top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches

Jennifer Jacquet, Monica Dietrich, John T. Jost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The United States wields disproportionate global influence in terms of carbon dioxide emissions and international climate policy. This makes it an especially important context in which to examine the interplay among social, psychological, and political factors in shaping attitudes and behaviors related to climate change. In this article, we review the emerging literature addressing the liberal-conservative divide in the U.S. with respect to thought, communication, and action concerning climate change. Because of its theoretical and practical significance, we focus on the motivational basis for skepticism and inaction on the part of some, including "top-down" institutional forces, such as corporate strategy, and "bottom-up" psychological factors, such as ego, group, and system justification. Although more research is needed to elucidate fully the social, cognitive, and motivational bases of environmental attitudes and behavior, a great deal has been learned in just a few years by focusing on specific ideological factors in addition to general psychological principles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1458
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume5
Issue numberDEC
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Climate Change
Psychology
Ego
Politics
Climate
Carbon Dioxide
Communication
Research

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Ideology
  • Liberal-conservative divide
  • System justification
  • U.S. political psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The ideological divide and climate change opinion : "Top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches. / Jacquet, Jennifer; Dietrich, Monica; Jost, John T.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, No. DEC, 1458, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{546665f04037412e9adfd8994c9599cb,
title = "The ideological divide and climate change opinion: {"}Top-down{"} and {"}bottom-up{"} approaches",
abstract = "The United States wields disproportionate global influence in terms of carbon dioxide emissions and international climate policy. This makes it an especially important context in which to examine the interplay among social, psychological, and political factors in shaping attitudes and behaviors related to climate change. In this article, we review the emerging literature addressing the liberal-conservative divide in the U.S. with respect to thought, communication, and action concerning climate change. Because of its theoretical and practical significance, we focus on the motivational basis for skepticism and inaction on the part of some, including {"}top-down{"} institutional forces, such as corporate strategy, and {"}bottom-up{"} psychological factors, such as ego, group, and system justification. Although more research is needed to elucidate fully the social, cognitive, and motivational bases of environmental attitudes and behavior, a great deal has been learned in just a few years by focusing on specific ideological factors in addition to general psychological principles.",
keywords = "Climate change, Ideology, Liberal-conservative divide, System justification, U.S. political psychology",
author = "Jennifer Jacquet and Monica Dietrich and Jost, {John T.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01458",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "DEC",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ideological divide and climate change opinion

T2 - "Top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches

AU - Jacquet, Jennifer

AU - Dietrich, Monica

AU - Jost, John T.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The United States wields disproportionate global influence in terms of carbon dioxide emissions and international climate policy. This makes it an especially important context in which to examine the interplay among social, psychological, and political factors in shaping attitudes and behaviors related to climate change. In this article, we review the emerging literature addressing the liberal-conservative divide in the U.S. with respect to thought, communication, and action concerning climate change. Because of its theoretical and practical significance, we focus on the motivational basis for skepticism and inaction on the part of some, including "top-down" institutional forces, such as corporate strategy, and "bottom-up" psychological factors, such as ego, group, and system justification. Although more research is needed to elucidate fully the social, cognitive, and motivational bases of environmental attitudes and behavior, a great deal has been learned in just a few years by focusing on specific ideological factors in addition to general psychological principles.

AB - The United States wields disproportionate global influence in terms of carbon dioxide emissions and international climate policy. This makes it an especially important context in which to examine the interplay among social, psychological, and political factors in shaping attitudes and behaviors related to climate change. In this article, we review the emerging literature addressing the liberal-conservative divide in the U.S. with respect to thought, communication, and action concerning climate change. Because of its theoretical and practical significance, we focus on the motivational basis for skepticism and inaction on the part of some, including "top-down" institutional forces, such as corporate strategy, and "bottom-up" psychological factors, such as ego, group, and system justification. Although more research is needed to elucidate fully the social, cognitive, and motivational bases of environmental attitudes and behavior, a great deal has been learned in just a few years by focusing on specific ideological factors in addition to general psychological principles.

KW - Climate change

KW - Ideology

KW - Liberal-conservative divide

KW - System justification

KW - U.S. political psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923345410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923345410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01458

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01458

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923345410

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - DEC

M1 - 1458

ER -