The hypohydrostatic rescaling and its impacts on modeling of atmospheric convection

Olivier Pauluis, Dargan M W Frierson, Stephen T. Garner, Isaac M. Held, Geoffrey K. Vallis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The atmospheric circulation spans a wide range of spatial scales, including the planetary scale (∼10,000 km), synoptic scale (∼2,000 km), mesoscale (∼200 km), and convective scales (< 20 km). The wide scale separation between convective motions, responsible for the vertical energy transport, and the planetary circulation, responsible for the meridional energy transport, has prevented explicit representation of convective motions in global atmospheric models. Kuang et al. (Geophys. Res. Lett. 32: L02809, 2005) have suggested a way to circumvent this limitation through a rescaling that they refer to as Diabatic Acceleration and REscaling (DARE). We focus here on a modified version of the procedure that we refer to as hypohydrostatic rescaling. These two strategies are equivalent for inviscid and adiabatic flow in the traditional meteorological setting in which the vertical component of the Coriolis acceleration is ignored, but they differ when atmospheric physics is taken into account. It is argued here that, while the hypohydrostatic rescaling preserves the dynamics of the planetary scale circulation, it increases the horizontal scale of convective motions. This drastically reduces the computational cost for explicit simulation of hypohydrostatic convection in a global atmospheric model. A key question is whether explicit simulations of hypohydrostatic convection could offer a valid alternative to convective parameterization in global models. To do so, radiative-convective equilibrium is simulated with a high-resolution non-hydrostatic model using different model resolutions and values of the rescaling parameter. When the behavior of hypohydrostatic convection is compared with coarse-resolution simulations of convection, the latter set of simulations reproduce more accurately the result from a reference high-resolution simulation. This is particularly true for the convective velocity and cloud ice distributions. Scaling arguments show that hypohydrostatic rescaling increases the convective overturning time. In particular, this convective slowdown associated with the hypohydrostatic rescaling is more significant than the slowdown resulting from under-resolving the convective elements. These results cast doubt on the practical value of the hypohydrostatic rescaling as an alternative to convective parameterization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)485-499
Number of pages15
JournalTheoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics
Volume20
Issue number5-6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

atmospheric convection
Rescaling
Convection
convection
Modeling
modeling
simulation
Parameterization
atmospheric models
parameterization
Energy Transport
Simulation
Motion
Ice
adiabatic flow
atmospheric physics
High Resolution
atmospheric circulation
ice clouds
Vertical

Keywords

  • Climate model
  • General circulation of the atmosphere
  • Moist convection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

The hypohydrostatic rescaling and its impacts on modeling of atmospheric convection. / Pauluis, Olivier; Frierson, Dargan M W; Garner, Stephen T.; Held, Isaac M.; Vallis, Geoffrey K.

In: Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 5-6, 11.2006, p. 485-499.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pauluis, Olivier ; Frierson, Dargan M W ; Garner, Stephen T. ; Held, Isaac M. ; Vallis, Geoffrey K. / The hypohydrostatic rescaling and its impacts on modeling of atmospheric convection. In: Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics. 2006 ; Vol. 20, No. 5-6. pp. 485-499.
@article{67422d9e6600438eadcc4b6f74d41b08,
title = "The hypohydrostatic rescaling and its impacts on modeling of atmospheric convection",
abstract = "The atmospheric circulation spans a wide range of spatial scales, including the planetary scale (∼10,000 km), synoptic scale (∼2,000 km), mesoscale (∼200 km), and convective scales (< 20 km). The wide scale separation between convective motions, responsible for the vertical energy transport, and the planetary circulation, responsible for the meridional energy transport, has prevented explicit representation of convective motions in global atmospheric models. Kuang et al. (Geophys. Res. Lett. 32: L02809, 2005) have suggested a way to circumvent this limitation through a rescaling that they refer to as Diabatic Acceleration and REscaling (DARE). We focus here on a modified version of the procedure that we refer to as hypohydrostatic rescaling. These two strategies are equivalent for inviscid and adiabatic flow in the traditional meteorological setting in which the vertical component of the Coriolis acceleration is ignored, but they differ when atmospheric physics is taken into account. It is argued here that, while the hypohydrostatic rescaling preserves the dynamics of the planetary scale circulation, it increases the horizontal scale of convective motions. This drastically reduces the computational cost for explicit simulation of hypohydrostatic convection in a global atmospheric model. A key question is whether explicit simulations of hypohydrostatic convection could offer a valid alternative to convective parameterization in global models. To do so, radiative-convective equilibrium is simulated with a high-resolution non-hydrostatic model using different model resolutions and values of the rescaling parameter. When the behavior of hypohydrostatic convection is compared with coarse-resolution simulations of convection, the latter set of simulations reproduce more accurately the result from a reference high-resolution simulation. This is particularly true for the convective velocity and cloud ice distributions. Scaling arguments show that hypohydrostatic rescaling increases the convective overturning time. In particular, this convective slowdown associated with the hypohydrostatic rescaling is more significant than the slowdown resulting from under-resolving the convective elements. These results cast doubt on the practical value of the hypohydrostatic rescaling as an alternative to convective parameterization.",
keywords = "Climate model, General circulation of the atmosphere, Moist convection",
author = "Olivier Pauluis and Frierson, {Dargan M W} and Garner, {Stephen T.} and Held, {Isaac M.} and Vallis, {Geoffrey K.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00162-006-0026-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "485--499",
journal = "Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics",
issn = "0935-4964",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The hypohydrostatic rescaling and its impacts on modeling of atmospheric convection

AU - Pauluis, Olivier

AU - Frierson, Dargan M W

AU - Garner, Stephen T.

AU - Held, Isaac M.

AU - Vallis, Geoffrey K.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - The atmospheric circulation spans a wide range of spatial scales, including the planetary scale (∼10,000 km), synoptic scale (∼2,000 km), mesoscale (∼200 km), and convective scales (< 20 km). The wide scale separation between convective motions, responsible for the vertical energy transport, and the planetary circulation, responsible for the meridional energy transport, has prevented explicit representation of convective motions in global atmospheric models. Kuang et al. (Geophys. Res. Lett. 32: L02809, 2005) have suggested a way to circumvent this limitation through a rescaling that they refer to as Diabatic Acceleration and REscaling (DARE). We focus here on a modified version of the procedure that we refer to as hypohydrostatic rescaling. These two strategies are equivalent for inviscid and adiabatic flow in the traditional meteorological setting in which the vertical component of the Coriolis acceleration is ignored, but they differ when atmospheric physics is taken into account. It is argued here that, while the hypohydrostatic rescaling preserves the dynamics of the planetary scale circulation, it increases the horizontal scale of convective motions. This drastically reduces the computational cost for explicit simulation of hypohydrostatic convection in a global atmospheric model. A key question is whether explicit simulations of hypohydrostatic convection could offer a valid alternative to convective parameterization in global models. To do so, radiative-convective equilibrium is simulated with a high-resolution non-hydrostatic model using different model resolutions and values of the rescaling parameter. When the behavior of hypohydrostatic convection is compared with coarse-resolution simulations of convection, the latter set of simulations reproduce more accurately the result from a reference high-resolution simulation. This is particularly true for the convective velocity and cloud ice distributions. Scaling arguments show that hypohydrostatic rescaling increases the convective overturning time. In particular, this convective slowdown associated with the hypohydrostatic rescaling is more significant than the slowdown resulting from under-resolving the convective elements. These results cast doubt on the practical value of the hypohydrostatic rescaling as an alternative to convective parameterization.

AB - The atmospheric circulation spans a wide range of spatial scales, including the planetary scale (∼10,000 km), synoptic scale (∼2,000 km), mesoscale (∼200 km), and convective scales (< 20 km). The wide scale separation between convective motions, responsible for the vertical energy transport, and the planetary circulation, responsible for the meridional energy transport, has prevented explicit representation of convective motions in global atmospheric models. Kuang et al. (Geophys. Res. Lett. 32: L02809, 2005) have suggested a way to circumvent this limitation through a rescaling that they refer to as Diabatic Acceleration and REscaling (DARE). We focus here on a modified version of the procedure that we refer to as hypohydrostatic rescaling. These two strategies are equivalent for inviscid and adiabatic flow in the traditional meteorological setting in which the vertical component of the Coriolis acceleration is ignored, but they differ when atmospheric physics is taken into account. It is argued here that, while the hypohydrostatic rescaling preserves the dynamics of the planetary scale circulation, it increases the horizontal scale of convective motions. This drastically reduces the computational cost for explicit simulation of hypohydrostatic convection in a global atmospheric model. A key question is whether explicit simulations of hypohydrostatic convection could offer a valid alternative to convective parameterization in global models. To do so, radiative-convective equilibrium is simulated with a high-resolution non-hydrostatic model using different model resolutions and values of the rescaling parameter. When the behavior of hypohydrostatic convection is compared with coarse-resolution simulations of convection, the latter set of simulations reproduce more accurately the result from a reference high-resolution simulation. This is particularly true for the convective velocity and cloud ice distributions. Scaling arguments show that hypohydrostatic rescaling increases the convective overturning time. In particular, this convective slowdown associated with the hypohydrostatic rescaling is more significant than the slowdown resulting from under-resolving the convective elements. These results cast doubt on the practical value of the hypohydrostatic rescaling as an alternative to convective parameterization.

KW - Climate model

KW - General circulation of the atmosphere

KW - Moist convection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750189407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750189407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00162-006-0026-x

DO - 10.1007/s00162-006-0026-x

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 485

EP - 499

JO - Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics

JF - Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics

SN - 0935-4964

IS - 5-6

ER -