The hutong effect: Informal social control and community psychology in Beijing

Clifton R. Emery, Shali Wu, Ramesh Raghavan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Background Nearly 2.4 million Beijing residents experience intimate partner violence (IPV) annually. Of these 2.4 million, over 800 000 are injured by IPV; more than 300 000 are injured badly enough to require medical attention. Informal social control exerted by neighbours in communities with high levels of family-community integration (like those made up of residents of traditional courtyard house-and-alley Beijing neighbourhoods called ‘Hutongs’) may protect against IPV injury compared with apartment dwellers. Methods We tested the protective effects of informal social control and Hutong residence in a randomly selected, three-stage cluster sample of Beijing families reporting IPV. Informal social control of IPV (ISC_IPV) was measured using two 7-question Likert scales developed by the first author. Interviewers were given detailed instructions on how to classify neighbourhoods as Hutong-style or not. We used a Sobel test to examine whether the Hutong effect was mediated by informal social control. The initial sample was of 506 families. Analyses were carried out on 113 families who reported any IPV in the last year. Results Random effects regression models showed that both acts of informal social control and Hutong residence were associated with less IPV injury. However, the protective finding for Hutong residence was not explained by informal social control, collective efficacy, characteristics of the IPV or demographic characteristics of respondents and households. Conclusions The unique protective association with Hutong residence suggests that the benefits of community life remain insufficiently theorised and understood.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)121-125
    Number of pages5
    JournalInjury Prevention
    Volume21
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 4 2015

    Fingerprint

    Informal Social Control
    Psychology
    Community Integration
    Beijing
    Intimate Partner Violence
    Wounds and Injuries
    Demography
    Interviews

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this

    The hutong effect : Informal social control and community psychology in Beijing. / Emery, Clifton R.; Wu, Shali; Raghavan, Ramesh.

    In: Injury Prevention, Vol. 21, No. 2, 04.01.2015, p. 121-125.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Emery, Clifton R. ; Wu, Shali ; Raghavan, Ramesh. / The hutong effect : Informal social control and community psychology in Beijing. In: Injury Prevention. 2015 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 121-125.
    @article{a6da0568f91343629998363f5aafff36,
    title = "The hutong effect: Informal social control and community psychology in Beijing",
    abstract = "Background Nearly 2.4 million Beijing residents experience intimate partner violence (IPV) annually. Of these 2.4 million, over 800 000 are injured by IPV; more than 300 000 are injured badly enough to require medical attention. Informal social control exerted by neighbours in communities with high levels of family-community integration (like those made up of residents of traditional courtyard house-and-alley Beijing neighbourhoods called ‘Hutongs’) may protect against IPV injury compared with apartment dwellers. Methods We tested the protective effects of informal social control and Hutong residence in a randomly selected, three-stage cluster sample of Beijing families reporting IPV. Informal social control of IPV (ISC_IPV) was measured using two 7-question Likert scales developed by the first author. Interviewers were given detailed instructions on how to classify neighbourhoods as Hutong-style or not. We used a Sobel test to examine whether the Hutong effect was mediated by informal social control. The initial sample was of 506 families. Analyses were carried out on 113 families who reported any IPV in the last year. Results Random effects regression models showed that both acts of informal social control and Hutong residence were associated with less IPV injury. However, the protective finding for Hutong residence was not explained by informal social control, collective efficacy, characteristics of the IPV or demographic characteristics of respondents and households. Conclusions The unique protective association with Hutong residence suggests that the benefits of community life remain insufficiently theorised and understood.",
    author = "Emery, {Clifton R.} and Shali Wu and Ramesh Raghavan",
    year = "2015",
    month = "1",
    day = "4",
    doi = "10.1136/injuryprev-2013-041117",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "121--125",
    journal = "Injury Prevention",
    issn = "1353-8047",
    publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The hutong effect

    T2 - Informal social control and community psychology in Beijing

    AU - Emery, Clifton R.

    AU - Wu, Shali

    AU - Raghavan, Ramesh

    PY - 2015/1/4

    Y1 - 2015/1/4

    N2 - Background Nearly 2.4 million Beijing residents experience intimate partner violence (IPV) annually. Of these 2.4 million, over 800 000 are injured by IPV; more than 300 000 are injured badly enough to require medical attention. Informal social control exerted by neighbours in communities with high levels of family-community integration (like those made up of residents of traditional courtyard house-and-alley Beijing neighbourhoods called ‘Hutongs’) may protect against IPV injury compared with apartment dwellers. Methods We tested the protective effects of informal social control and Hutong residence in a randomly selected, three-stage cluster sample of Beijing families reporting IPV. Informal social control of IPV (ISC_IPV) was measured using two 7-question Likert scales developed by the first author. Interviewers were given detailed instructions on how to classify neighbourhoods as Hutong-style or not. We used a Sobel test to examine whether the Hutong effect was mediated by informal social control. The initial sample was of 506 families. Analyses were carried out on 113 families who reported any IPV in the last year. Results Random effects regression models showed that both acts of informal social control and Hutong residence were associated with less IPV injury. However, the protective finding for Hutong residence was not explained by informal social control, collective efficacy, characteristics of the IPV or demographic characteristics of respondents and households. Conclusions The unique protective association with Hutong residence suggests that the benefits of community life remain insufficiently theorised and understood.

    AB - Background Nearly 2.4 million Beijing residents experience intimate partner violence (IPV) annually. Of these 2.4 million, over 800 000 are injured by IPV; more than 300 000 are injured badly enough to require medical attention. Informal social control exerted by neighbours in communities with high levels of family-community integration (like those made up of residents of traditional courtyard house-and-alley Beijing neighbourhoods called ‘Hutongs’) may protect against IPV injury compared with apartment dwellers. Methods We tested the protective effects of informal social control and Hutong residence in a randomly selected, three-stage cluster sample of Beijing families reporting IPV. Informal social control of IPV (ISC_IPV) was measured using two 7-question Likert scales developed by the first author. Interviewers were given detailed instructions on how to classify neighbourhoods as Hutong-style or not. We used a Sobel test to examine whether the Hutong effect was mediated by informal social control. The initial sample was of 506 families. Analyses were carried out on 113 families who reported any IPV in the last year. Results Random effects regression models showed that both acts of informal social control and Hutong residence were associated with less IPV injury. However, the protective finding for Hutong residence was not explained by informal social control, collective efficacy, characteristics of the IPV or demographic characteristics of respondents and households. Conclusions The unique protective association with Hutong residence suggests that the benefits of community life remain insufficiently theorised and understood.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925739840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925739840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-041117

    DO - 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-041117

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 25183743

    AN - SCOPUS:84925739840

    VL - 21

    SP - 121

    EP - 125

    JO - Injury Prevention

    JF - Injury Prevention

    SN - 1353-8047

    IS - 2

    ER -