The hidden cost of hidden terminals

Feilu Liu, Jian Lin, Zhifeng Tao, Thanasis Korakis, Elza Erkip, Shivendra Panwar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The performance unfairness problem in a single cell IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network (WLAN) is considered. While existing research is based on the assumption that all nodes have the same transmission success probability and per-node throughput, this fairness exists only if all nodes within range of the access point can sense each other. Recent measurements suggest that this is not necessarily true and terminals can be hidden from each other. In this paper, the impact of hidden terminals on the performance unfairness among individual nodes is investigated via analysis, simulation and experimental measurements in a real network. In the presence of hidden terminals, it is observed that the widely accepted conclusion of equal performance among nodes does not hold any more. Instead, nodes far from the access point (AP) see more hidden terminals than those close to the AP, so they get more packet losses and lower throughput. This phenomenon is not due to inter-cell interference, or channel disparities among nodes, and is significant even when the RTS/CTS mechanism designed to mitigate the impact of hidden terminals is turned on. The simulation results show that for a 16-node WLAN with a fixed data rate of 6Mbps, the throughput of a node close to the AP is more than twice that of an edge node, due to hidden terminals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Event2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010 - Cape Town, South Africa
Duration: May 23 2010May 27 2010

Other

Other2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010
CountrySouth Africa
CityCape Town
Period5/23/105/27/10

Fingerprint

Throughput
Wireless local area networks (WLAN)
Costs
Packet loss

Keywords

  • 802.11
  • CSMA
  • Hidden terminal
  • Measurement
  • Performance unfairness
  • Throughput
  • Wireless LAN

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Liu, F., Lin, J., Tao, Z., Korakis, T., Erkip, E., & Panwar, S. (2010). The hidden cost of hidden terminals. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010 [5502214] https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2010.5502214

The hidden cost of hidden terminals. / Liu, Feilu; Lin, Jian; Tao, Zhifeng; Korakis, Thanasis; Erkip, Elza; Panwar, Shivendra.

2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010. 2010. 5502214.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Liu, F, Lin, J, Tao, Z, Korakis, T, Erkip, E & Panwar, S 2010, The hidden cost of hidden terminals. in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010., 5502214, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010, Cape Town, South Africa, 5/23/10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2010.5502214
Liu F, Lin J, Tao Z, Korakis T, Erkip E, Panwar S. The hidden cost of hidden terminals. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010. 2010. 5502214 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2010.5502214
Liu, Feilu ; Lin, Jian ; Tao, Zhifeng ; Korakis, Thanasis ; Erkip, Elza ; Panwar, Shivendra. / The hidden cost of hidden terminals. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010. 2010.
@inproceedings{e8950058038b4415846dd01ea9eec02a,
title = "The hidden cost of hidden terminals",
abstract = "The performance unfairness problem in a single cell IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network (WLAN) is considered. While existing research is based on the assumption that all nodes have the same transmission success probability and per-node throughput, this fairness exists only if all nodes within range of the access point can sense each other. Recent measurements suggest that this is not necessarily true and terminals can be hidden from each other. In this paper, the impact of hidden terminals on the performance unfairness among individual nodes is investigated via analysis, simulation and experimental measurements in a real network. In the presence of hidden terminals, it is observed that the widely accepted conclusion of equal performance among nodes does not hold any more. Instead, nodes far from the access point (AP) see more hidden terminals than those close to the AP, so they get more packet losses and lower throughput. This phenomenon is not due to inter-cell interference, or channel disparities among nodes, and is significant even when the RTS/CTS mechanism designed to mitigate the impact of hidden terminals is turned on. The simulation results show that for a 16-node WLAN with a fixed data rate of 6Mbps, the throughput of a node close to the AP is more than twice that of an edge node, due to hidden terminals.",
keywords = "802.11, CSMA, Hidden terminal, Measurement, Performance unfairness, Throughput, Wireless LAN",
author = "Feilu Liu and Jian Lin and Zhifeng Tao and Thanasis Korakis and Elza Erkip and Shivendra Panwar",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1109/ICC.2010.5502214",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781424464043",
booktitle = "2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The hidden cost of hidden terminals

AU - Liu, Feilu

AU - Lin, Jian

AU - Tao, Zhifeng

AU - Korakis, Thanasis

AU - Erkip, Elza

AU - Panwar, Shivendra

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The performance unfairness problem in a single cell IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network (WLAN) is considered. While existing research is based on the assumption that all nodes have the same transmission success probability and per-node throughput, this fairness exists only if all nodes within range of the access point can sense each other. Recent measurements suggest that this is not necessarily true and terminals can be hidden from each other. In this paper, the impact of hidden terminals on the performance unfairness among individual nodes is investigated via analysis, simulation and experimental measurements in a real network. In the presence of hidden terminals, it is observed that the widely accepted conclusion of equal performance among nodes does not hold any more. Instead, nodes far from the access point (AP) see more hidden terminals than those close to the AP, so they get more packet losses and lower throughput. This phenomenon is not due to inter-cell interference, or channel disparities among nodes, and is significant even when the RTS/CTS mechanism designed to mitigate the impact of hidden terminals is turned on. The simulation results show that for a 16-node WLAN with a fixed data rate of 6Mbps, the throughput of a node close to the AP is more than twice that of an edge node, due to hidden terminals.

AB - The performance unfairness problem in a single cell IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network (WLAN) is considered. While existing research is based on the assumption that all nodes have the same transmission success probability and per-node throughput, this fairness exists only if all nodes within range of the access point can sense each other. Recent measurements suggest that this is not necessarily true and terminals can be hidden from each other. In this paper, the impact of hidden terminals on the performance unfairness among individual nodes is investigated via analysis, simulation and experimental measurements in a real network. In the presence of hidden terminals, it is observed that the widely accepted conclusion of equal performance among nodes does not hold any more. Instead, nodes far from the access point (AP) see more hidden terminals than those close to the AP, so they get more packet losses and lower throughput. This phenomenon is not due to inter-cell interference, or channel disparities among nodes, and is significant even when the RTS/CTS mechanism designed to mitigate the impact of hidden terminals is turned on. The simulation results show that for a 16-node WLAN with a fixed data rate of 6Mbps, the throughput of a node close to the AP is more than twice that of an edge node, due to hidden terminals.

KW - 802.11

KW - CSMA

KW - Hidden terminal

KW - Measurement

KW - Performance unfairness

KW - Throughput

KW - Wireless LAN

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955408386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955408386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ICC.2010.5502214

DO - 10.1109/ICC.2010.5502214

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781424464043

BT - 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2010

ER -