The future of system justification theory

John Jost, Vivienne Badaan, Shahrzad Goudarzi, Mark Hoffarth, Mao Mogami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article, we respond to commentaries by Friesen et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.), Osborne et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.), and Owuamalam et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.) on the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of system justification theory. The first two commentaries are highly favourable in their evaluation of the state of theory and research on system justification, and they provide insightful suggestions for new directions. The third commentary is far more critical of system justification theory. We address each objection in some detail, seeking to correct a number of misconceptions about system justification theory and clarify the fact that the theory specifies three – ego, group, and system justification – motives rather than one. Finally, we end by proposing exciting new areas for future research, such as (1) distinguishing between subjective and objective consequences of system justification in a broader array of social and political contexts and (2) developing practical interventions to reduce system justification motivation and strengthen the motivation to improve upon the status quo.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Motivation
Ego
Anniversaries and Special Events
Research
Direction compound

Keywords

  • collective action
  • ideology
  • intergroup relations
  • social change
  • social identification
  • system justification theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Jost, J., Badaan, V., Goudarzi, S., Hoffarth, M., & Mogami, M. (Accepted/In press). The future of system justification theory. British Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12309

The future of system justification theory. / Jost, John; Badaan, Vivienne; Goudarzi, Shahrzad; Hoffarth, Mark; Mogami, Mao.

In: British Journal of Social Psychology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jost, John ; Badaan, Vivienne ; Goudarzi, Shahrzad ; Hoffarth, Mark ; Mogami, Mao. / The future of system justification theory. In: British Journal of Social Psychology. 2019.
@article{bc7cf45dad9047c0a343f2affc4e9817,
title = "The future of system justification theory",
abstract = "In this article, we respond to commentaries by Friesen et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.), Osborne et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.), and Owuamalam et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.) on the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of system justification theory. The first two commentaries are highly favourable in their evaluation of the state of theory and research on system justification, and they provide insightful suggestions for new directions. The third commentary is far more critical of system justification theory. We address each objection in some detail, seeking to correct a number of misconceptions about system justification theory and clarify the fact that the theory specifies three – ego, group, and system justification – motives rather than one. Finally, we end by proposing exciting new areas for future research, such as (1) distinguishing between subjective and objective consequences of system justification in a broader array of social and political contexts and (2) developing practical interventions to reduce system justification motivation and strengthen the motivation to improve upon the status quo.",
keywords = "collective action, ideology, intergroup relations, social change, social identification, system justification theory",
author = "John Jost and Vivienne Badaan and Shahrzad Goudarzi and Mark Hoffarth and Mao Mogami",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bjso.12309",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "British Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0144-6665",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The future of system justification theory

AU - Jost, John

AU - Badaan, Vivienne

AU - Goudarzi, Shahrzad

AU - Hoffarth, Mark

AU - Mogami, Mao

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In this article, we respond to commentaries by Friesen et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.), Osborne et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.), and Owuamalam et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.) on the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of system justification theory. The first two commentaries are highly favourable in their evaluation of the state of theory and research on system justification, and they provide insightful suggestions for new directions. The third commentary is far more critical of system justification theory. We address each objection in some detail, seeking to correct a number of misconceptions about system justification theory and clarify the fact that the theory specifies three – ego, group, and system justification – motives rather than one. Finally, we end by proposing exciting new areas for future research, such as (1) distinguishing between subjective and objective consequences of system justification in a broader array of social and political contexts and (2) developing practical interventions to reduce system justification motivation and strengthen the motivation to improve upon the status quo.

AB - In this article, we respond to commentaries by Friesen et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.), Osborne et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.), and Owuamalam et al. (2018, Br. J. Soc. Psychol.) on the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of system justification theory. The first two commentaries are highly favourable in their evaluation of the state of theory and research on system justification, and they provide insightful suggestions for new directions. The third commentary is far more critical of system justification theory. We address each objection in some detail, seeking to correct a number of misconceptions about system justification theory and clarify the fact that the theory specifies three – ego, group, and system justification – motives rather than one. Finally, we end by proposing exciting new areas for future research, such as (1) distinguishing between subjective and objective consequences of system justification in a broader array of social and political contexts and (2) developing practical interventions to reduce system justification motivation and strengthen the motivation to improve upon the status quo.

KW - collective action

KW - ideology

KW - intergroup relations

KW - social change

KW - social identification

KW - system justification theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059260733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059260733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bjso.12309

DO - 10.1111/bjso.12309

M3 - Article

JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0144-6665

ER -