The establishment and subsequent expansion of the Waitangi Tribunal: The politics of agenda setting

Amy Catalinac

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    In modern-day democratic political systems, governments are constantly presented with multiple concerns that often affect a diversity of groups. Studies of agenda setting help explain the various forces that interact to focus government attention and decision-making on a particular concern. This article examines the applicability of theories of agenda setting developed by John W. Kingdon in the American political context to two of New Zealand's most path-breaking and far-reaching policy changes: the passage of the Treaty of Waitangi Act in 1975, which established the Waitangi Tribunal, and the subsequent amendment to that legislation in 1985, which widened its powers. While the three factors identified by Kingdon as being pertinent to agenda setting - problem recognition, changes in the political stream and the role of visible participants - provide the background for these two significant policy changes, the particular characteristics of the New Zealand politico- institutional system - noted in Buhrs' and Bartlett's work on environmental policy making in New Zealand - are necessary to account for the way in which Maori sought to draw government attention to their concerns via protest activism. Within the New Zealand political context these movements were able to create conditions that enabled the government to overcome the constraints posed by previous policy and embark in a new direction. Notions of path dependence are also utilised to provide a fuller account of the second policy change.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)5-22
    Number of pages18
    JournalPolitical Science
    Volume56
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Jun 2004

    Fingerprint

    New Zealand
    politics
    path dependence
    environmental policy
    treaty
    political system
    protest
    amendment
    legislation
    act
    decision making
    Group

    Keywords

    • Agenda-setting
    • New Zealand race relations
    • Waitangi Tribunal

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    The establishment and subsequent expansion of the Waitangi Tribunal : The politics of agenda setting. / Catalinac, Amy.

    In: Political Science, Vol. 56, No. 1, 06.2004, p. 5-22.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    @article{9ee4a11fd86f406db7560e6f0f3fd55c,
    title = "The establishment and subsequent expansion of the Waitangi Tribunal: The politics of agenda setting",
    abstract = "In modern-day democratic political systems, governments are constantly presented with multiple concerns that often affect a diversity of groups. Studies of agenda setting help explain the various forces that interact to focus government attention and decision-making on a particular concern. This article examines the applicability of theories of agenda setting developed by John W. Kingdon in the American political context to two of New Zealand's most path-breaking and far-reaching policy changes: the passage of the Treaty of Waitangi Act in 1975, which established the Waitangi Tribunal, and the subsequent amendment to that legislation in 1985, which widened its powers. While the three factors identified by Kingdon as being pertinent to agenda setting - problem recognition, changes in the political stream and the role of visible participants - provide the background for these two significant policy changes, the particular characteristics of the New Zealand politico- institutional system - noted in Buhrs' and Bartlett's work on environmental policy making in New Zealand - are necessary to account for the way in which Maori sought to draw government attention to their concerns via protest activism. Within the New Zealand political context these movements were able to create conditions that enabled the government to overcome the constraints posed by previous policy and embark in a new direction. Notions of path dependence are also utilised to provide a fuller account of the second policy change.",
    keywords = "Agenda-setting, New Zealand race relations, Waitangi Tribunal",
    author = "Amy Catalinac",
    year = "2004",
    month = "6",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "56",
    pages = "5--22",
    journal = "Political Science",
    issn = "0032-3187",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The establishment and subsequent expansion of the Waitangi Tribunal

    T2 - The politics of agenda setting

    AU - Catalinac, Amy

    PY - 2004/6

    Y1 - 2004/6

    N2 - In modern-day democratic political systems, governments are constantly presented with multiple concerns that often affect a diversity of groups. Studies of agenda setting help explain the various forces that interact to focus government attention and decision-making on a particular concern. This article examines the applicability of theories of agenda setting developed by John W. Kingdon in the American political context to two of New Zealand's most path-breaking and far-reaching policy changes: the passage of the Treaty of Waitangi Act in 1975, which established the Waitangi Tribunal, and the subsequent amendment to that legislation in 1985, which widened its powers. While the three factors identified by Kingdon as being pertinent to agenda setting - problem recognition, changes in the political stream and the role of visible participants - provide the background for these two significant policy changes, the particular characteristics of the New Zealand politico- institutional system - noted in Buhrs' and Bartlett's work on environmental policy making in New Zealand - are necessary to account for the way in which Maori sought to draw government attention to their concerns via protest activism. Within the New Zealand political context these movements were able to create conditions that enabled the government to overcome the constraints posed by previous policy and embark in a new direction. Notions of path dependence are also utilised to provide a fuller account of the second policy change.

    AB - In modern-day democratic political systems, governments are constantly presented with multiple concerns that often affect a diversity of groups. Studies of agenda setting help explain the various forces that interact to focus government attention and decision-making on a particular concern. This article examines the applicability of theories of agenda setting developed by John W. Kingdon in the American political context to two of New Zealand's most path-breaking and far-reaching policy changes: the passage of the Treaty of Waitangi Act in 1975, which established the Waitangi Tribunal, and the subsequent amendment to that legislation in 1985, which widened its powers. While the three factors identified by Kingdon as being pertinent to agenda setting - problem recognition, changes in the political stream and the role of visible participants - provide the background for these two significant policy changes, the particular characteristics of the New Zealand politico- institutional system - noted in Buhrs' and Bartlett's work on environmental policy making in New Zealand - are necessary to account for the way in which Maori sought to draw government attention to their concerns via protest activism. Within the New Zealand political context these movements were able to create conditions that enabled the government to overcome the constraints posed by previous policy and embark in a new direction. Notions of path dependence are also utilised to provide a fuller account of the second policy change.

    KW - Agenda-setting

    KW - New Zealand race relations

    KW - Waitangi Tribunal

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544268327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4544268327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Review article

    AN - SCOPUS:4544268327

    VL - 56

    SP - 5

    EP - 22

    JO - Political Science

    JF - Political Science

    SN - 0032-3187

    IS - 1

    ER -