The equity effects of state school finance reforms

A methodological critique and new evidence

Leanna Stiefel, Robert Berne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since 1970, over half the states have reformed their school finance systems with improvement in equity of revenue and resource distributions as one of the stated goals. While numerous studies evaluating the equity effects of these often expensive reforms have been undertaken, there remains much disagreement about how to assess the reforms' impacts. In this article, we address the problems of measuring equity effects with an emphasis on the need for multiple definitions and an understanding of the value judgments inherent in all measures of equity. Next, three methodologies that have been used to assess the equity impacts of school finance reform are critiqued. Finally, in an effort to correct shortcomings of each, a fourth methodology is developed and new empirical evidence on the effects of reform based on that methodology are presented. The article concludes with observations about the importance of the choice of a methodology with which to evaluate complex policy changes that involve value judgments about what is fair, just, and equitable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-98
Number of pages24
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1981

Fingerprint

equity
finance
reform
value judgement
methodology
school
evidence
financial system
revenue
effect
resource
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Development
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

The equity effects of state school finance reforms : A methodological critique and new evidence. / Stiefel, Leanna; Berne, Robert.

In: Policy Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 1, 02.1981, p. 75-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a67542d751684037adf794ae13209d86,
title = "The equity effects of state school finance reforms: A methodological critique and new evidence",
abstract = "Since 1970, over half the states have reformed their school finance systems with improvement in equity of revenue and resource distributions as one of the stated goals. While numerous studies evaluating the equity effects of these often expensive reforms have been undertaken, there remains much disagreement about how to assess the reforms' impacts. In this article, we address the problems of measuring equity effects with an emphasis on the need for multiple definitions and an understanding of the value judgments inherent in all measures of equity. Next, three methodologies that have been used to assess the equity impacts of school finance reform are critiqued. Finally, in an effort to correct shortcomings of each, a fourth methodology is developed and new empirical evidence on the effects of reform based on that methodology are presented. The article concludes with observations about the importance of the choice of a methodology with which to evaluate complex policy changes that involve value judgments about what is fair, just, and equitable.",
author = "Leanna Stiefel and Robert Berne",
year = "1981",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/BF00155933",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "75--98",
journal = "Policy Sciences",
issn = "0032-2687",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The equity effects of state school finance reforms

T2 - A methodological critique and new evidence

AU - Stiefel, Leanna

AU - Berne, Robert

PY - 1981/2

Y1 - 1981/2

N2 - Since 1970, over half the states have reformed their school finance systems with improvement in equity of revenue and resource distributions as one of the stated goals. While numerous studies evaluating the equity effects of these often expensive reforms have been undertaken, there remains much disagreement about how to assess the reforms' impacts. In this article, we address the problems of measuring equity effects with an emphasis on the need for multiple definitions and an understanding of the value judgments inherent in all measures of equity. Next, three methodologies that have been used to assess the equity impacts of school finance reform are critiqued. Finally, in an effort to correct shortcomings of each, a fourth methodology is developed and new empirical evidence on the effects of reform based on that methodology are presented. The article concludes with observations about the importance of the choice of a methodology with which to evaluate complex policy changes that involve value judgments about what is fair, just, and equitable.

AB - Since 1970, over half the states have reformed their school finance systems with improvement in equity of revenue and resource distributions as one of the stated goals. While numerous studies evaluating the equity effects of these often expensive reforms have been undertaken, there remains much disagreement about how to assess the reforms' impacts. In this article, we address the problems of measuring equity effects with an emphasis on the need for multiple definitions and an understanding of the value judgments inherent in all measures of equity. Next, three methodologies that have been used to assess the equity impacts of school finance reform are critiqued. Finally, in an effort to correct shortcomings of each, a fourth methodology is developed and new empirical evidence on the effects of reform based on that methodology are presented. The article concludes with observations about the importance of the choice of a methodology with which to evaluate complex policy changes that involve value judgments about what is fair, just, and equitable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346507374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346507374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00155933

DO - 10.1007/BF00155933

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 75

EP - 98

JO - Policy Sciences

JF - Policy Sciences

SN - 0032-2687

IS - 1

ER -