The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis

Arie W. Kruglanski, Jocelyn Belanger, Xiaoyan Chen, Catalina Köpetz, Antonio Pierro, Lucia Mannetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A force-field theory of motivated cognition is presented and applied to a broad variety of phenomena in social judgment and self-regulation. Purposeful cognitive activity is assumed to be propelled by a driving force and opposed by a restraining force. Potential driving force represents the maximal amount of energy an individual is prepared to invest in a cognitive activity. Effective driving force corresponds to the amount of energy he or she actually invests in attempt to match the restraining force. Magnitude of the potential driving force derives from a combination of goal importance and the pool of available mental resources, whereas magnitude of the restraining force derives from an individual's inclination to conserve resources, current task demands, and competing goals. The present analysis has implications for choice of means to achieve one's cognitive goals as well as for successful goal attainment under specific force-field constellations. Empirical evidence for these effects is considered, and the underlying theory's integrative potential is highlighted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalPsychological Review
Volume119
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Cognition

Keywords

  • Cognitive energetics theory
  • Driving force
  • Motivated cognition
  • Restraining force

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Kruglanski, A. W., Belanger, J., Chen, X., Köpetz, C., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2012). The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review, 119(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025488

The energetics of motivated cognition : A force-field analysis. / Kruglanski, Arie W.; Belanger, Jocelyn; Chen, Xiaoyan; Köpetz, Catalina; Pierro, Antonio; Mannetti, Lucia.

In: Psychological Review, Vol. 119, No. 1, 01.12.2012, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kruglanski, AW, Belanger, J, Chen, X, Köpetz, C, Pierro, A & Mannetti, L 2012, 'The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis', Psychological Review, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025488
Kruglanski AW, Belanger J, Chen X, Köpetz C, Pierro A, Mannetti L. The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review. 2012 Dec 1;119(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025488
Kruglanski, Arie W. ; Belanger, Jocelyn ; Chen, Xiaoyan ; Köpetz, Catalina ; Pierro, Antonio ; Mannetti, Lucia. / The energetics of motivated cognition : A force-field analysis. In: Psychological Review. 2012 ; Vol. 119, No. 1. pp. 1-20.
@article{25eb058379dc456bb494b8f7cc8e195b,
title = "The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis",
abstract = "A force-field theory of motivated cognition is presented and applied to a broad variety of phenomena in social judgment and self-regulation. Purposeful cognitive activity is assumed to be propelled by a driving force and opposed by a restraining force. Potential driving force represents the maximal amount of energy an individual is prepared to invest in a cognitive activity. Effective driving force corresponds to the amount of energy he or she actually invests in attempt to match the restraining force. Magnitude of the potential driving force derives from a combination of goal importance and the pool of available mental resources, whereas magnitude of the restraining force derives from an individual's inclination to conserve resources, current task demands, and competing goals. The present analysis has implications for choice of means to achieve one's cognitive goals as well as for successful goal attainment under specific force-field constellations. Empirical evidence for these effects is considered, and the underlying theory's integrative potential is highlighted.",
keywords = "Cognitive energetics theory, Driving force, Motivated cognition, Restraining force",
author = "Kruglanski, {Arie W.} and Jocelyn Belanger and Xiaoyan Chen and Catalina K{\"o}petz and Antonio Pierro and Lucia Mannetti",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0025488",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The energetics of motivated cognition

T2 - A force-field analysis

AU - Kruglanski, Arie W.

AU - Belanger, Jocelyn

AU - Chen, Xiaoyan

AU - Köpetz, Catalina

AU - Pierro, Antonio

AU - Mannetti, Lucia

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - A force-field theory of motivated cognition is presented and applied to a broad variety of phenomena in social judgment and self-regulation. Purposeful cognitive activity is assumed to be propelled by a driving force and opposed by a restraining force. Potential driving force represents the maximal amount of energy an individual is prepared to invest in a cognitive activity. Effective driving force corresponds to the amount of energy he or she actually invests in attempt to match the restraining force. Magnitude of the potential driving force derives from a combination of goal importance and the pool of available mental resources, whereas magnitude of the restraining force derives from an individual's inclination to conserve resources, current task demands, and competing goals. The present analysis has implications for choice of means to achieve one's cognitive goals as well as for successful goal attainment under specific force-field constellations. Empirical evidence for these effects is considered, and the underlying theory's integrative potential is highlighted.

AB - A force-field theory of motivated cognition is presented and applied to a broad variety of phenomena in social judgment and self-regulation. Purposeful cognitive activity is assumed to be propelled by a driving force and opposed by a restraining force. Potential driving force represents the maximal amount of energy an individual is prepared to invest in a cognitive activity. Effective driving force corresponds to the amount of energy he or she actually invests in attempt to match the restraining force. Magnitude of the potential driving force derives from a combination of goal importance and the pool of available mental resources, whereas magnitude of the restraining force derives from an individual's inclination to conserve resources, current task demands, and competing goals. The present analysis has implications for choice of means to achieve one's cognitive goals as well as for successful goal attainment under specific force-field constellations. Empirical evidence for these effects is considered, and the underlying theory's integrative potential is highlighted.

KW - Cognitive energetics theory

KW - Driving force

KW - Motivated cognition

KW - Restraining force

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859772658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859772658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0025488

DO - 10.1037/a0025488

M3 - Article

C2 - 21967165

AN - SCOPUS:84859772658

VL - 119

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 1

ER -