The End of the Youth Gang

Fad or Fact?

HEDY BOOKIN‐WEINER, Ruth Horowitz

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The varying attention criminologists have paid to youth gangs over the past several decades cannot be explained completely by the actual seriousness of gang delinquency and its extent relative to other kinds of delinquency. In order to explain this changing focus of attention by delinquency researchers, this article explores the interrelationships among four types of factors: social and political conditions, ideology, current sociological theory, and available methods. We focus on ideology and methodology, and argue that when ideology is largely centrist, such as during the 1950s and 1960s, theory would most likely be interactionist or subcultural and gangs would likely be of interest. During periods of greater ideological polarization, such as the late 1960s, however, we would expect to find more theoretical and empirical concern with either the individual or with social and economic structure and little interest in gangs.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)585-602
    Number of pages18
    JournalCriminology
    Volume21
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1983

    Fingerprint

    delinquency
    ideology
    Social Conditions
    Politics
    sociological theory
    Economics
    Research Personnel
    economic structure
    political factors
    polarization
    social structure
    social factors
    methodology
    Social Theory

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
    • Law

    Cite this

    The End of the Youth Gang : Fad or Fact? / BOOKIN‐WEINER, HEDY; Horowitz, Ruth.

    In: Criminology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1983, p. 585-602.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    BOOKIN‐WEINER, HEDY & Horowitz, R 1983, 'The End of the Youth Gang: Fad or Fact?', Criminology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 585-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00281.x
    BOOKIN‐WEINER, HEDY ; Horowitz, Ruth. / The End of the Youth Gang : Fad or Fact?. In: Criminology. 1983 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 585-602.
    @article{40e3e99c003642d5b9257c6d5d4ae058,
    title = "The End of the Youth Gang: Fad or Fact?",
    abstract = "The varying attention criminologists have paid to youth gangs over the past several decades cannot be explained completely by the actual seriousness of gang delinquency and its extent relative to other kinds of delinquency. In order to explain this changing focus of attention by delinquency researchers, this article explores the interrelationships among four types of factors: social and political conditions, ideology, current sociological theory, and available methods. We focus on ideology and methodology, and argue that when ideology is largely centrist, such as during the 1950s and 1960s, theory would most likely be interactionist or subcultural and gangs would likely be of interest. During periods of greater ideological polarization, such as the late 1960s, however, we would expect to find more theoretical and empirical concern with either the individual or with social and economic structure and little interest in gangs.",
    author = "HEDY BOOKIN‐WEINER and Ruth Horowitz",
    year = "1983",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00281.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "585--602",
    journal = "Criminology",
    issn = "0011-1384",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The End of the Youth Gang

    T2 - Fad or Fact?

    AU - BOOKIN‐WEINER, HEDY

    AU - Horowitz, Ruth

    PY - 1983

    Y1 - 1983

    N2 - The varying attention criminologists have paid to youth gangs over the past several decades cannot be explained completely by the actual seriousness of gang delinquency and its extent relative to other kinds of delinquency. In order to explain this changing focus of attention by delinquency researchers, this article explores the interrelationships among four types of factors: social and political conditions, ideology, current sociological theory, and available methods. We focus on ideology and methodology, and argue that when ideology is largely centrist, such as during the 1950s and 1960s, theory would most likely be interactionist or subcultural and gangs would likely be of interest. During periods of greater ideological polarization, such as the late 1960s, however, we would expect to find more theoretical and empirical concern with either the individual or with social and economic structure and little interest in gangs.

    AB - The varying attention criminologists have paid to youth gangs over the past several decades cannot be explained completely by the actual seriousness of gang delinquency and its extent relative to other kinds of delinquency. In order to explain this changing focus of attention by delinquency researchers, this article explores the interrelationships among four types of factors: social and political conditions, ideology, current sociological theory, and available methods. We focus on ideology and methodology, and argue that when ideology is largely centrist, such as during the 1950s and 1960s, theory would most likely be interactionist or subcultural and gangs would likely be of interest. During periods of greater ideological polarization, such as the late 1960s, however, we would expect to find more theoretical and empirical concern with either the individual or with social and economic structure and little interest in gangs.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984313667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984313667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00281.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00281.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 21

    SP - 585

    EP - 602

    JO - Criminology

    JF - Criminology

    SN - 0011-1384

    IS - 4

    ER -