The employer-based health insurance system: Mistake or cornerstone?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

For decades, health policy analysts have voiced their disdain for employer-based health insurance. In 1961, Herman and Anne Somers referred to the system as the "'shotgun' marriage of medical care and industrial relations" (Somers and Somers 1961, 227). Critics routinely belittle job-based coverage as an unfortunate historical accident, the by-product of shortlived wartime wage and price controls that moved compensation toward such benefits (Hyman and Hall 2001). Analysts today see the dismantling of this illogical, inefficient institution as an essential step toward the development of universal, equitable health insurance in the United States (Fuchs 1994).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPolicy Challenges in Modern Health Care
PublisherRutgers University Press
Pages37-52
Number of pages16
Volume9780813541099
ISBN (Electronic)9780813541099
ISBN (Print)0813535778, 9780813535777
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

health insurance
employer
industrial relations
dismantling
health policy
medical care
critic
wage
accident
coverage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Glied, S. (2005). The employer-based health insurance system: Mistake or cornerstone? In Policy Challenges in Modern Health Care (Vol. 9780813541099, pp. 37-52). Rutgers University Press.

The employer-based health insurance system : Mistake or cornerstone? / Glied, Sharon.

Policy Challenges in Modern Health Care. Vol. 9780813541099 Rutgers University Press, 2005. p. 37-52.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Glied, S 2005, The employer-based health insurance system: Mistake or cornerstone? in Policy Challenges in Modern Health Care. vol. 9780813541099, Rutgers University Press, pp. 37-52.
Glied S. The employer-based health insurance system: Mistake or cornerstone? In Policy Challenges in Modern Health Care. Vol. 9780813541099. Rutgers University Press. 2005. p. 37-52
Glied, Sharon. / The employer-based health insurance system : Mistake or cornerstone?. Policy Challenges in Modern Health Care. Vol. 9780813541099 Rutgers University Press, 2005. pp. 37-52
@inbook{0f0a14c53fb248c4aa24fd128c2fb1c1,
title = "The employer-based health insurance system: Mistake or cornerstone?",
abstract = "For decades, health policy analysts have voiced their disdain for employer-based health insurance. In 1961, Herman and Anne Somers referred to the system as the {"}'shotgun' marriage of medical care and industrial relations{"} (Somers and Somers 1961, 227). Critics routinely belittle job-based coverage as an unfortunate historical accident, the by-product of shortlived wartime wage and price controls that moved compensation toward such benefits (Hyman and Hall 2001). Analysts today see the dismantling of this illogical, inefficient institution as an essential step toward the development of universal, equitable health insurance in the United States (Fuchs 1994).",
author = "Sharon Glied",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0813535778",
volume = "9780813541099",
pages = "37--52",
booktitle = "Policy Challenges in Modern Health Care",
publisher = "Rutgers University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The employer-based health insurance system

T2 - Mistake or cornerstone?

AU - Glied, Sharon

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - For decades, health policy analysts have voiced their disdain for employer-based health insurance. In 1961, Herman and Anne Somers referred to the system as the "'shotgun' marriage of medical care and industrial relations" (Somers and Somers 1961, 227). Critics routinely belittle job-based coverage as an unfortunate historical accident, the by-product of shortlived wartime wage and price controls that moved compensation toward such benefits (Hyman and Hall 2001). Analysts today see the dismantling of this illogical, inefficient institution as an essential step toward the development of universal, equitable health insurance in the United States (Fuchs 1994).

AB - For decades, health policy analysts have voiced their disdain for employer-based health insurance. In 1961, Herman and Anne Somers referred to the system as the "'shotgun' marriage of medical care and industrial relations" (Somers and Somers 1961, 227). Critics routinely belittle job-based coverage as an unfortunate historical accident, the by-product of shortlived wartime wage and price controls that moved compensation toward such benefits (Hyman and Hall 2001). Analysts today see the dismantling of this illogical, inefficient institution as an essential step toward the development of universal, equitable health insurance in the United States (Fuchs 1994).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548138788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548138788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:34548138788

SN - 0813535778

SN - 9780813535777

VL - 9780813541099

SP - 37

EP - 52

BT - Policy Challenges in Modern Health Care

PB - Rutgers University Press

ER -