The Effects of Qigong for Adults with Chronic Pain

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhenggang Bai, Zhen Guan, Yuan Fan, Chuan Liu, Kehu Yang, Bin Ma, Bei Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of qigong as a treatment for chronic pain. Five electronic databases were searched from their date of establishment until July 2014. The review included 10 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared the impacts of qigong on chronic pain with waiting list or placebo or general care. Random effect models and standard mean differences were used to present pain scores. A total of 10 RCTs met inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference on reducing chronic pain between internal qigong and control (SMD: -1.23 95% CI=-2.23, -0.24 p=0.02), external qigong and general care (SMD: -1.53 95% CI=-2.15,-0.91 p<0.05), external qigong and placebo (SMD: -0.51 95% CI=-0.95,-0.06p=0.03), and internal qigong for chronic neck pain at 6 months (SMD: -1.00 95% CI=-1.94,-0.06 p=0.04). The differences between external qigong and control, external qigong and waiting list, internal qigong and waiting list, and external for premenstrual syndromes were not significant. This study showed that internal qigong generated benefits on treating some chronic pain with significant differences. External qigong showed nonsignificant differences in treating chronic pain. Higher quality randomized clinical trials with scientific rigor are needed to establish the effectiveness of qigong in reducing chronic pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1525-1539
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Chinese Medicine
Volume43
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Qigong
Chronic Pain
Meta-Analysis
Waiting Lists
Randomized Controlled Trials
Placebos
Premenstrual Syndrome
Neck Pain

Keywords

  • Chronic Pain
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Qigong
  • Systematic Review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

The Effects of Qigong for Adults with Chronic Pain : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. / Bai, Zhenggang; Guan, Zhen; Fan, Yuan; Liu, Chuan; Yang, Kehu; Ma, Bin; Wu, Bei.

In: American Journal of Chinese Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 8, 01.10.2015, p. 1525-1539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bai, Zhenggang ; Guan, Zhen ; Fan, Yuan ; Liu, Chuan ; Yang, Kehu ; Ma, Bin ; Wu, Bei. / The Effects of Qigong for Adults with Chronic Pain : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. In: American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 43, No. 8. pp. 1525-1539.
@article{1f4f6195aa6c474592f0aa2534da7af9,
title = "The Effects of Qigong for Adults with Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of qigong as a treatment for chronic pain. Five electronic databases were searched from their date of establishment until July 2014. The review included 10 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared the impacts of qigong on chronic pain with waiting list or placebo or general care. Random effect models and standard mean differences were used to present pain scores. A total of 10 RCTs met inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference on reducing chronic pain between internal qigong and control (SMD: -1.23 95{\%} CI=-2.23, -0.24 p=0.02), external qigong and general care (SMD: -1.53 95{\%} CI=-2.15,-0.91 p<0.05), external qigong and placebo (SMD: -0.51 95{\%} CI=-0.95,-0.06p=0.03), and internal qigong for chronic neck pain at 6 months (SMD: -1.00 95{\%} CI=-1.94,-0.06 p=0.04). The differences between external qigong and control, external qigong and waiting list, internal qigong and waiting list, and external for premenstrual syndromes were not significant. This study showed that internal qigong generated benefits on treating some chronic pain with significant differences. External qigong showed nonsignificant differences in treating chronic pain. Higher quality randomized clinical trials with scientific rigor are needed to establish the effectiveness of qigong in reducing chronic pain.",
keywords = "Chronic Pain, Meta-Analysis, Qigong, Systematic Review",
author = "Zhenggang Bai and Zhen Guan and Yuan Fan and Chuan Liu and Kehu Yang and Bin Ma and Bei Wu",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1142/S0192415X15500871",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1525--1539",
journal = "American Journal of Chinese Medicine",
issn = "0192-415X",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Qigong for Adults with Chronic Pain

T2 - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AU - Bai, Zhenggang

AU - Guan, Zhen

AU - Fan, Yuan

AU - Liu, Chuan

AU - Yang, Kehu

AU - Ma, Bin

AU - Wu, Bei

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of qigong as a treatment for chronic pain. Five electronic databases were searched from their date of establishment until July 2014. The review included 10 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared the impacts of qigong on chronic pain with waiting list or placebo or general care. Random effect models and standard mean differences were used to present pain scores. A total of 10 RCTs met inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference on reducing chronic pain between internal qigong and control (SMD: -1.23 95% CI=-2.23, -0.24 p=0.02), external qigong and general care (SMD: -1.53 95% CI=-2.15,-0.91 p<0.05), external qigong and placebo (SMD: -0.51 95% CI=-0.95,-0.06p=0.03), and internal qigong for chronic neck pain at 6 months (SMD: -1.00 95% CI=-1.94,-0.06 p=0.04). The differences between external qigong and control, external qigong and waiting list, internal qigong and waiting list, and external for premenstrual syndromes were not significant. This study showed that internal qigong generated benefits on treating some chronic pain with significant differences. External qigong showed nonsignificant differences in treating chronic pain. Higher quality randomized clinical trials with scientific rigor are needed to establish the effectiveness of qigong in reducing chronic pain.

AB - A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of qigong as a treatment for chronic pain. Five electronic databases were searched from their date of establishment until July 2014. The review included 10 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared the impacts of qigong on chronic pain with waiting list or placebo or general care. Random effect models and standard mean differences were used to present pain scores. A total of 10 RCTs met inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference on reducing chronic pain between internal qigong and control (SMD: -1.23 95% CI=-2.23, -0.24 p=0.02), external qigong and general care (SMD: -1.53 95% CI=-2.15,-0.91 p<0.05), external qigong and placebo (SMD: -0.51 95% CI=-0.95,-0.06p=0.03), and internal qigong for chronic neck pain at 6 months (SMD: -1.00 95% CI=-1.94,-0.06 p=0.04). The differences between external qigong and control, external qigong and waiting list, internal qigong and waiting list, and external for premenstrual syndromes were not significant. This study showed that internal qigong generated benefits on treating some chronic pain with significant differences. External qigong showed nonsignificant differences in treating chronic pain. Higher quality randomized clinical trials with scientific rigor are needed to establish the effectiveness of qigong in reducing chronic pain.

KW - Chronic Pain

KW - Meta-Analysis

KW - Qigong

KW - Systematic Review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953348276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953348276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1142/S0192415X15500871

DO - 10.1142/S0192415X15500871

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1525

EP - 1539

JO - American Journal of Chinese Medicine

JF - American Journal of Chinese Medicine

SN - 0192-415X

IS - 8

ER -