The effects of contrast and size on orientation discrimination

Isabelle Mareschal, Robert M. Shapley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Motivated by the recent physiological finding that a neuron's receptive field can increase in size by a factor of 2-4 fold at low contrast (Sceniak et al 1999; Kapadia et al. 1999), we sought to examine whether a psychophysical task might reflect the contrast dependent changes in the size/structure of a receptive field. We postulate that since spatial summation is not contrast invariant, a task which relies on the spatial structure of a receptive field, such as orientation discrimination, should also be affected by changes in contrast. Previously, orientation discrimination thresholds have been reported to be roughly independent of the contrast of a stimulus for most of the visible range of contrasts. In this experiment, subjects were presented with two patches of grating and were required to indicate whether the second was shifted clockwise or counter-clockwise relative to the first. Contrast and size of the gratings were varied independently and measurements were made in the fovea and near periphery. We found large improvements in orientation discrimination with contrast that were parametric in stimulus area. Furthermore, the apparent constancy of orientation discrimination for large area stimuli is likely a result of a floor effect on the threshold. Therefore we conclude that there is not strong evidence for contrast invariant orientation discrimination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume3
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Neurons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The effects of contrast and size on orientation discrimination. / Mareschal, Isabelle; Shapley, Robert M.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 3, No. 9, 2003.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2961efe51985407ab2276ca253ce06aa,
title = "The effects of contrast and size on orientation discrimination",
abstract = "Motivated by the recent physiological finding that a neuron's receptive field can increase in size by a factor of 2-4 fold at low contrast (Sceniak et al 1999; Kapadia et al. 1999), we sought to examine whether a psychophysical task might reflect the contrast dependent changes in the size/structure of a receptive field. We postulate that since spatial summation is not contrast invariant, a task which relies on the spatial structure of a receptive field, such as orientation discrimination, should also be affected by changes in contrast. Previously, orientation discrimination thresholds have been reported to be roughly independent of the contrast of a stimulus for most of the visible range of contrasts. In this experiment, subjects were presented with two patches of grating and were required to indicate whether the second was shifted clockwise or counter-clockwise relative to the first. Contrast and size of the gratings were varied independently and measurements were made in the fovea and near periphery. We found large improvements in orientation discrimination with contrast that were parametric in stimulus area. Furthermore, the apparent constancy of orientation discrimination for large area stimuli is likely a result of a floor effect on the threshold. Therefore we conclude that there is not strong evidence for contrast invariant orientation discrimination.",
author = "Isabelle Mareschal and Shapley, {Robert M.}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1167/3.9.215",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of contrast and size on orientation discrimination

AU - Mareschal, Isabelle

AU - Shapley, Robert M.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Motivated by the recent physiological finding that a neuron's receptive field can increase in size by a factor of 2-4 fold at low contrast (Sceniak et al 1999; Kapadia et al. 1999), we sought to examine whether a psychophysical task might reflect the contrast dependent changes in the size/structure of a receptive field. We postulate that since spatial summation is not contrast invariant, a task which relies on the spatial structure of a receptive field, such as orientation discrimination, should also be affected by changes in contrast. Previously, orientation discrimination thresholds have been reported to be roughly independent of the contrast of a stimulus for most of the visible range of contrasts. In this experiment, subjects were presented with two patches of grating and were required to indicate whether the second was shifted clockwise or counter-clockwise relative to the first. Contrast and size of the gratings were varied independently and measurements were made in the fovea and near periphery. We found large improvements in orientation discrimination with contrast that were parametric in stimulus area. Furthermore, the apparent constancy of orientation discrimination for large area stimuli is likely a result of a floor effect on the threshold. Therefore we conclude that there is not strong evidence for contrast invariant orientation discrimination.

AB - Motivated by the recent physiological finding that a neuron's receptive field can increase in size by a factor of 2-4 fold at low contrast (Sceniak et al 1999; Kapadia et al. 1999), we sought to examine whether a psychophysical task might reflect the contrast dependent changes in the size/structure of a receptive field. We postulate that since spatial summation is not contrast invariant, a task which relies on the spatial structure of a receptive field, such as orientation discrimination, should also be affected by changes in contrast. Previously, orientation discrimination thresholds have been reported to be roughly independent of the contrast of a stimulus for most of the visible range of contrasts. In this experiment, subjects were presented with two patches of grating and were required to indicate whether the second was shifted clockwise or counter-clockwise relative to the first. Contrast and size of the gratings were varied independently and measurements were made in the fovea and near periphery. We found large improvements in orientation discrimination with contrast that were parametric in stimulus area. Furthermore, the apparent constancy of orientation discrimination for large area stimuli is likely a result of a floor effect on the threshold. Therefore we conclude that there is not strong evidence for contrast invariant orientation discrimination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243139629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243139629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/3.9.215

DO - 10.1167/3.9.215

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4243139629

VL - 3

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 9

ER -