The effects of attention in texture segmentation in the lower and upper visual fields

C. P. Talgar, Marisa Carrasco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: This study is based on two findings: 1) In a texture segmentation task, attending to the target location improved performance where the resolution is too low (periphery) but impaired it where resolution is already too high (central locations) for the task. These results indicate an enhanced spatial resolution at the attended location (Yeshurun & Carrasco, 1998). 2) In some tasks, performance is better across the horizontal than the vertical meridian -horizontal vertical anisotropy- and in the lower than upper region of the vertical meridian -vertical meridian asymmetry (VMA). Whereas some attribute this "performance field" to attentional effects, Carrasco, Talgar & Cameron (in press) showed that although transient attention enhances overall contrast sensitivity, the shape of the performance field does not change - performance fields are determined by visual factors. Goal: Is there a VMA for spatial resolution? At equal eccentricities, does attention enhance spatial resolution to the same degree inthe upper and lower regions of the vertical meridian? Methods: In a texture segmentation task where performance peaks at mid-peripheral locations, the central performance drop is attributed to the spatial filters at the fovea being too small for the scale of the texture. In a 2IFC task observers were presented with a cue that either indicated the time of target onset (neutral cue: 50% of trials) or indicated both time and location of target onset (peripheral cue: 50% of trials). The target patch appeared at varying eccentricities in a large texture pattern along the vertical meridian. Results: 1) The central performance drop was larger and performance peaked at farther eccentricities in the lower than upper visual field. 2) Attention affected the visual field uniformly. Conclusion: Resolution was higher in the lower half of the vertical meridian. The degree of enhanced resolution brought about by transient attention was constant along the vertical meridian.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Meridians
Visual Fields
Cues
Task Performance and Analysis
Contrast Sensitivity
Anisotropy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The effects of attention in texture segmentation in the lower and upper visual fields. / Talgar, C. P.; Carrasco, Marisa.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2a7e60abbeaa481b927fd9b62c48b00e,
title = "The effects of attention in texture segmentation in the lower and upper visual fields",
abstract = "Introduction: This study is based on two findings: 1) In a texture segmentation task, attending to the target location improved performance where the resolution is too low (periphery) but impaired it where resolution is already too high (central locations) for the task. These results indicate an enhanced spatial resolution at the attended location (Yeshurun & Carrasco, 1998). 2) In some tasks, performance is better across the horizontal than the vertical meridian -horizontal vertical anisotropy- and in the lower than upper region of the vertical meridian -vertical meridian asymmetry (VMA). Whereas some attribute this {"}performance field{"} to attentional effects, Carrasco, Talgar & Cameron (in press) showed that although transient attention enhances overall contrast sensitivity, the shape of the performance field does not change - performance fields are determined by visual factors. Goal: Is there a VMA for spatial resolution? At equal eccentricities, does attention enhance spatial resolution to the same degree inthe upper and lower regions of the vertical meridian? Methods: In a texture segmentation task where performance peaks at mid-peripheral locations, the central performance drop is attributed to the spatial filters at the fovea being too small for the scale of the texture. In a 2IFC task observers were presented with a cue that either indicated the time of target onset (neutral cue: 50{\%} of trials) or indicated both time and location of target onset (peripheral cue: 50{\%} of trials). The target patch appeared at varying eccentricities in a large texture pattern along the vertical meridian. Results: 1) The central performance drop was larger and performance peaked at farther eccentricities in the lower than upper visual field. 2) Attention affected the visual field uniformly. Conclusion: Resolution was higher in the lower half of the vertical meridian. The degree of enhanced resolution brought about by transient attention was constant along the vertical meridian.",
author = "Talgar, {C. P.} and Marisa Carrasco",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1167/1.3.76",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of attention in texture segmentation in the lower and upper visual fields

AU - Talgar, C. P.

AU - Carrasco, Marisa

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Introduction: This study is based on two findings: 1) In a texture segmentation task, attending to the target location improved performance where the resolution is too low (periphery) but impaired it where resolution is already too high (central locations) for the task. These results indicate an enhanced spatial resolution at the attended location (Yeshurun & Carrasco, 1998). 2) In some tasks, performance is better across the horizontal than the vertical meridian -horizontal vertical anisotropy- and in the lower than upper region of the vertical meridian -vertical meridian asymmetry (VMA). Whereas some attribute this "performance field" to attentional effects, Carrasco, Talgar & Cameron (in press) showed that although transient attention enhances overall contrast sensitivity, the shape of the performance field does not change - performance fields are determined by visual factors. Goal: Is there a VMA for spatial resolution? At equal eccentricities, does attention enhance spatial resolution to the same degree inthe upper and lower regions of the vertical meridian? Methods: In a texture segmentation task where performance peaks at mid-peripheral locations, the central performance drop is attributed to the spatial filters at the fovea being too small for the scale of the texture. In a 2IFC task observers were presented with a cue that either indicated the time of target onset (neutral cue: 50% of trials) or indicated both time and location of target onset (peripheral cue: 50% of trials). The target patch appeared at varying eccentricities in a large texture pattern along the vertical meridian. Results: 1) The central performance drop was larger and performance peaked at farther eccentricities in the lower than upper visual field. 2) Attention affected the visual field uniformly. Conclusion: Resolution was higher in the lower half of the vertical meridian. The degree of enhanced resolution brought about by transient attention was constant along the vertical meridian.

AB - Introduction: This study is based on two findings: 1) In a texture segmentation task, attending to the target location improved performance where the resolution is too low (periphery) but impaired it where resolution is already too high (central locations) for the task. These results indicate an enhanced spatial resolution at the attended location (Yeshurun & Carrasco, 1998). 2) In some tasks, performance is better across the horizontal than the vertical meridian -horizontal vertical anisotropy- and in the lower than upper region of the vertical meridian -vertical meridian asymmetry (VMA). Whereas some attribute this "performance field" to attentional effects, Carrasco, Talgar & Cameron (in press) showed that although transient attention enhances overall contrast sensitivity, the shape of the performance field does not change - performance fields are determined by visual factors. Goal: Is there a VMA for spatial resolution? At equal eccentricities, does attention enhance spatial resolution to the same degree inthe upper and lower regions of the vertical meridian? Methods: In a texture segmentation task where performance peaks at mid-peripheral locations, the central performance drop is attributed to the spatial filters at the fovea being too small for the scale of the texture. In a 2IFC task observers were presented with a cue that either indicated the time of target onset (neutral cue: 50% of trials) or indicated both time and location of target onset (peripheral cue: 50% of trials). The target patch appeared at varying eccentricities in a large texture pattern along the vertical meridian. Results: 1) The central performance drop was larger and performance peaked at farther eccentricities in the lower than upper visual field. 2) Attention affected the visual field uniformly. Conclusion: Resolution was higher in the lower half of the vertical meridian. The degree of enhanced resolution brought about by transient attention was constant along the vertical meridian.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143059366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143059366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/1.3.76

DO - 10.1167/1.3.76

M3 - Article

VL - 1

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 3

ER -