The effect of negative polarity items on inference verification

Anna Szabolcsi, Lewis Bott, Brian McElree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The scalar approach to negative polarity item (NPI) licensing assumes that NPIs are allowable in contexts in which the introduction of the NPI leads to proposition strengthening (e.g. Kadmon & Landman 1993; Krifka 1995; Lahiri 1997; Chierchia 2006). A straightforward processing prediction from such a theory is that NPIs facilitate inference verification from sets to subsets. Three experiments are reported that test this proposal. In each experiment, participants evaluated whether inferences from sets to subsets were valid. Crucially, we manipulated whether the premises contained an NPI. In Experiment 1, participants completed a metalinguistic reasoning task and Experiments 2 and 3 tested reading times using a self-paced reading task. Contrary to expectations, no facilitation was observed when the NPI was present in the premise compared to when it was absent. In fact, the NPI significantly slowed down reading times in the inference region. Our results therefore favour those scalar theories that predict that the NPI is costly to process (Chierchia 2006), or other, non-scalar theories (Ladusaw 1992; Giannakidou 1998; Szabolcsi 2004; Postal 2005) that likewise predict NPI processing cost but, unlike Chierchia (2006), expect the magnitude of the processing cost to vary with the actual pragmatics of the NPI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-450
Number of pages40
JournalJournal of Semantics
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

experiment
Processing
Experiments
costs
Costs
pragmatics
Negative Polarity Items
Inference
time
Experiment
Reading Time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

The effect of negative polarity items on inference verification. / Szabolcsi, Anna; Bott, Lewis; McElree, Brian.

In: Journal of Semantics, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2008, p. 411-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Szabolcsi, Anna ; Bott, Lewis ; McElree, Brian. / The effect of negative polarity items on inference verification. In: Journal of Semantics. 2008 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 411-450.
@article{d155c365cf0246dab796b30b512daa9a,
title = "The effect of negative polarity items on inference verification",
abstract = "The scalar approach to negative polarity item (NPI) licensing assumes that NPIs are allowable in contexts in which the introduction of the NPI leads to proposition strengthening (e.g. Kadmon & Landman 1993; Krifka 1995; Lahiri 1997; Chierchia 2006). A straightforward processing prediction from such a theory is that NPIs facilitate inference verification from sets to subsets. Three experiments are reported that test this proposal. In each experiment, participants evaluated whether inferences from sets to subsets were valid. Crucially, we manipulated whether the premises contained an NPI. In Experiment 1, participants completed a metalinguistic reasoning task and Experiments 2 and 3 tested reading times using a self-paced reading task. Contrary to expectations, no facilitation was observed when the NPI was present in the premise compared to when it was absent. In fact, the NPI significantly slowed down reading times in the inference region. Our results therefore favour those scalar theories that predict that the NPI is costly to process (Chierchia 2006), or other, non-scalar theories (Ladusaw 1992; Giannakidou 1998; Szabolcsi 2004; Postal 2005) that likewise predict NPI processing cost but, unlike Chierchia (2006), expect the magnitude of the processing cost to vary with the actual pragmatics of the NPI.",
author = "Anna Szabolcsi and Lewis Bott and Brian McElree",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1093/jos/ffn008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "411--450",
journal = "Journal of Semantics",
issn = "0167-5133",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of negative polarity items on inference verification

AU - Szabolcsi, Anna

AU - Bott, Lewis

AU - McElree, Brian

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The scalar approach to negative polarity item (NPI) licensing assumes that NPIs are allowable in contexts in which the introduction of the NPI leads to proposition strengthening (e.g. Kadmon & Landman 1993; Krifka 1995; Lahiri 1997; Chierchia 2006). A straightforward processing prediction from such a theory is that NPIs facilitate inference verification from sets to subsets. Three experiments are reported that test this proposal. In each experiment, participants evaluated whether inferences from sets to subsets were valid. Crucially, we manipulated whether the premises contained an NPI. In Experiment 1, participants completed a metalinguistic reasoning task and Experiments 2 and 3 tested reading times using a self-paced reading task. Contrary to expectations, no facilitation was observed when the NPI was present in the premise compared to when it was absent. In fact, the NPI significantly slowed down reading times in the inference region. Our results therefore favour those scalar theories that predict that the NPI is costly to process (Chierchia 2006), or other, non-scalar theories (Ladusaw 1992; Giannakidou 1998; Szabolcsi 2004; Postal 2005) that likewise predict NPI processing cost but, unlike Chierchia (2006), expect the magnitude of the processing cost to vary with the actual pragmatics of the NPI.

AB - The scalar approach to negative polarity item (NPI) licensing assumes that NPIs are allowable in contexts in which the introduction of the NPI leads to proposition strengthening (e.g. Kadmon & Landman 1993; Krifka 1995; Lahiri 1997; Chierchia 2006). A straightforward processing prediction from such a theory is that NPIs facilitate inference verification from sets to subsets. Three experiments are reported that test this proposal. In each experiment, participants evaluated whether inferences from sets to subsets were valid. Crucially, we manipulated whether the premises contained an NPI. In Experiment 1, participants completed a metalinguistic reasoning task and Experiments 2 and 3 tested reading times using a self-paced reading task. Contrary to expectations, no facilitation was observed when the NPI was present in the premise compared to when it was absent. In fact, the NPI significantly slowed down reading times in the inference region. Our results therefore favour those scalar theories that predict that the NPI is costly to process (Chierchia 2006), or other, non-scalar theories (Ladusaw 1992; Giannakidou 1998; Szabolcsi 2004; Postal 2005) that likewise predict NPI processing cost but, unlike Chierchia (2006), expect the magnitude of the processing cost to vary with the actual pragmatics of the NPI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65549128254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65549128254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jos/ffn008

DO - 10.1093/jos/ffn008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:65549128254

VL - 25

SP - 411

EP - 450

JO - Journal of Semantics

JF - Journal of Semantics

SN - 0167-5133

IS - 4

ER -