The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion

Amilcar C. Freitas, Estevam A. Bonfante, Gabriela Giro, Malvin N. Janal, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs. Material and methods: Thirty-six implants with identical thread design, but different cutting groove design were divided in three groups: (1) non-fluted (no cutting groove, solid screw-form); (2) fluted (90° cut at the apex, tap design); and (3) Blossom (Patent pending) (non-fluted with engineered trimmed thread design). The implants were screwed into polyurethane foam blocks and the insertion torque was recorded after each turn of 90° by a digital torque gauge. Controlled lateral loads of 10N followed by increments of 5 up to 100N were sequentially applied by a digital force gauge on a titanium abutment. Statistical comparison was performed with two-way mixed model ANOVA that evaluated implant design group, linear effects of turns and displacement loads, and their interaction. Results: While insertion torque increased as a function of number of turns for each design, the slope and final values increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom to the fluted to the non-fluted design (M±standard deviation [SD]=64.1±26.8, 139.4±17.2, and 205.23±24.3Ncm, respectively). While a linear relationship between horizontal displacement and lateral force was observed for each design, the slope and maximal displacement increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom to the fluted to the non-fluted design (M±SD=530±57.7, 585.9±82.4, and 782.33±269.4μm, respectively). There was negligible to moderate levels of association between insertion torque and lateral displacement in the Blossom , fluted and non-fluted design groups, respectively. Conclusion: Insertion torque was reduced in implant macrodesigns that incorporated cutting edges, and lesser insertion torque was generally associated with decreased micromovement. However, insertion torque and micromotion were unrelated within implant designs, particularly for those designs showing the least insertion torque.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-118
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Torque
Titanium
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • Dental implant
  • Insertion torque
  • Micromotion
  • Osseointegration
  • Primary stability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion. / Freitas, Amilcar C.; Bonfante, Estevam A.; Giro, Gabriela; Janal, Malvin N.; Coelho, Paulo.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 113-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Freitas, Amilcar C. ; Bonfante, Estevam A. ; Giro, Gabriela ; Janal, Malvin N. ; Coelho, Paulo. / The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 113-118.
@article{0f8ece6f609f411c80ac62992b7eb390,
title = "The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs. Material and methods: Thirty-six implants with identical thread design, but different cutting groove design were divided in three groups: (1) non-fluted (no cutting groove, solid screw-form); (2) fluted (90° cut at the apex, tap design); and (3) Blossom ™ (Patent pending) (non-fluted with engineered trimmed thread design). The implants were screwed into polyurethane foam blocks and the insertion torque was recorded after each turn of 90° by a digital torque gauge. Controlled lateral loads of 10N followed by increments of 5 up to 100N were sequentially applied by a digital force gauge on a titanium abutment. Statistical comparison was performed with two-way mixed model ANOVA that evaluated implant design group, linear effects of turns and displacement loads, and their interaction. Results: While insertion torque increased as a function of number of turns for each design, the slope and final values increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom ™ to the fluted to the non-fluted design (M±standard deviation [SD]=64.1±26.8, 139.4±17.2, and 205.23±24.3Ncm, respectively). While a linear relationship between horizontal displacement and lateral force was observed for each design, the slope and maximal displacement increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom ™ to the fluted to the non-fluted design (M±SD=530±57.7, 585.9±82.4, and 782.33±269.4μm, respectively). There was negligible to moderate levels of association between insertion torque and lateral displacement in the Blossom ™, fluted and non-fluted design groups, respectively. Conclusion: Insertion torque was reduced in implant macrodesigns that incorporated cutting edges, and lesser insertion torque was generally associated with decreased micromovement. However, insertion torque and micromotion were unrelated within implant designs, particularly for those designs showing the least insertion torque.",
keywords = "Dental implant, Insertion torque, Micromotion, Osseointegration, Primary stability",
author = "Freitas, {Amilcar C.} and Bonfante, {Estevam A.} and Gabriela Giro and Janal, {Malvin N.} and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "113--118",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion

AU - Freitas, Amilcar C.

AU - Bonfante, Estevam A.

AU - Giro, Gabriela

AU - Janal, Malvin N.

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs. Material and methods: Thirty-six implants with identical thread design, but different cutting groove design were divided in three groups: (1) non-fluted (no cutting groove, solid screw-form); (2) fluted (90° cut at the apex, tap design); and (3) Blossom ™ (Patent pending) (non-fluted with engineered trimmed thread design). The implants were screwed into polyurethane foam blocks and the insertion torque was recorded after each turn of 90° by a digital torque gauge. Controlled lateral loads of 10N followed by increments of 5 up to 100N were sequentially applied by a digital force gauge on a titanium abutment. Statistical comparison was performed with two-way mixed model ANOVA that evaluated implant design group, linear effects of turns and displacement loads, and their interaction. Results: While insertion torque increased as a function of number of turns for each design, the slope and final values increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom ™ to the fluted to the non-fluted design (M±standard deviation [SD]=64.1±26.8, 139.4±17.2, and 205.23±24.3Ncm, respectively). While a linear relationship between horizontal displacement and lateral force was observed for each design, the slope and maximal displacement increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom ™ to the fluted to the non-fluted design (M±SD=530±57.7, 585.9±82.4, and 782.33±269.4μm, respectively). There was negligible to moderate levels of association between insertion torque and lateral displacement in the Blossom ™, fluted and non-fluted design groups, respectively. Conclusion: Insertion torque was reduced in implant macrodesigns that incorporated cutting edges, and lesser insertion torque was generally associated with decreased micromovement. However, insertion torque and micromotion were unrelated within implant designs, particularly for those designs showing the least insertion torque.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs. Material and methods: Thirty-six implants with identical thread design, but different cutting groove design were divided in three groups: (1) non-fluted (no cutting groove, solid screw-form); (2) fluted (90° cut at the apex, tap design); and (3) Blossom ™ (Patent pending) (non-fluted with engineered trimmed thread design). The implants were screwed into polyurethane foam blocks and the insertion torque was recorded after each turn of 90° by a digital torque gauge. Controlled lateral loads of 10N followed by increments of 5 up to 100N were sequentially applied by a digital force gauge on a titanium abutment. Statistical comparison was performed with two-way mixed model ANOVA that evaluated implant design group, linear effects of turns and displacement loads, and their interaction. Results: While insertion torque increased as a function of number of turns for each design, the slope and final values increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom ™ to the fluted to the non-fluted design (M±standard deviation [SD]=64.1±26.8, 139.4±17.2, and 205.23±24.3Ncm, respectively). While a linear relationship between horizontal displacement and lateral force was observed for each design, the slope and maximal displacement increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom ™ to the fluted to the non-fluted design (M±SD=530±57.7, 585.9±82.4, and 782.33±269.4μm, respectively). There was negligible to moderate levels of association between insertion torque and lateral displacement in the Blossom ™, fluted and non-fluted design groups, respectively. Conclusion: Insertion torque was reduced in implant macrodesigns that incorporated cutting edges, and lesser insertion torque was generally associated with decreased micromovement. However, insertion torque and micromotion were unrelated within implant designs, particularly for those designs showing the least insertion torque.

KW - Dental implant

KW - Insertion torque

KW - Micromotion

KW - Osseointegration

KW - Primary stability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84155167465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84155167465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21426405

AN - SCOPUS:84155167465

VL - 23

SP - 113

EP - 118

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 1

ER -