The effect of generic statements on children's causal attributions: Questions of mechanism

Andrei Cimpian, Lucy C. Erickson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Generic statements, or generics, express generalizations about entire kinds (e.g., "Girls are good at a game called 'tooki'"). In contrast, nongeneric statements express facts about specific (sets of) individuals (e.g., "Jane is good at tooki"). Aside from simply conveying information, generics and nongenerics also instill different causal perspectives on the facts expressed, implying that these facts stem from deep, inherent causes (e.g., talent) or from external, mechanistic causes (e.g., instruction), respectively. In the present research (with samples of 4- to 7-year-olds and undergraduates, N= 220), we proposed that children's causal attributions for the facts learned through these statements are determined not by the generic/nongeneric format of the statements themselves but rather by the generic/nongeneric format of the beliefs relevant to these statements. This proposal led to two specific predictions. First, the influence of the generic belief induced by a novel generic statement should be detected in any subsequent context that falls under its scope50-even in circumstances that involve particular individuals. Confirming this prediction, participants often attributed a fact conveyed in a nongeneric statement (e.g., a particular girl's tooki ability) to deep, inherent causes if they had previously formed a relevant generic belief (e.g., by hearing that girls are good at tooki). Second, we predicted that nongeneric statements such as "Most girls are good at tooki" should also promote attributions to deep causes because they often ultimately give rise to generic beliefs, as suggested by recent evidence. This prediction was confirmed as well. These results clarify and expand our knowledge of the influence of language on children's understanding of the world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-170
Number of pages12
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

attribution
Aptitude
Child Language
cause
Hearing
Research
instruction
ability
language
evidence

Keywords

  • Causal reasoning
  • Essentialism
  • Generic statements
  • Quantified statements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

The effect of generic statements on children's causal attributions : Questions of mechanism. / Cimpian, Andrei; Erickson, Lucy C.

In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 159-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44e49846111d43b987d97aef84b4b88b,
title = "The effect of generic statements on children's causal attributions: Questions of mechanism",
abstract = "Generic statements, or generics, express generalizations about entire kinds (e.g., {"}Girls are good at a game called 'tooki'{"}). In contrast, nongeneric statements express facts about specific (sets of) individuals (e.g., {"}Jane is good at tooki{"}). Aside from simply conveying information, generics and nongenerics also instill different causal perspectives on the facts expressed, implying that these facts stem from deep, inherent causes (e.g., talent) or from external, mechanistic causes (e.g., instruction), respectively. In the present research (with samples of 4- to 7-year-olds and undergraduates, N= 220), we proposed that children's causal attributions for the facts learned through these statements are determined not by the generic/nongeneric format of the statements themselves but rather by the generic/nongeneric format of the beliefs relevant to these statements. This proposal led to two specific predictions. First, the influence of the generic belief induced by a novel generic statement should be detected in any subsequent context that falls under its scope50-even in circumstances that involve particular individuals. Confirming this prediction, participants often attributed a fact conveyed in a nongeneric statement (e.g., a particular girl's tooki ability) to deep, inherent causes if they had previously formed a relevant generic belief (e.g., by hearing that girls are good at tooki). Second, we predicted that nongeneric statements such as {"}Most girls are good at tooki{"} should also promote attributions to deep causes because they often ultimately give rise to generic beliefs, as suggested by recent evidence. This prediction was confirmed as well. These results clarify and expand our knowledge of the influence of language on children's understanding of the world.",
keywords = "Causal reasoning, Essentialism, Generic statements, Quantified statements",
author = "Andrei Cimpian and Erickson, {Lucy C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0025274",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "159--170",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of generic statements on children's causal attributions

T2 - Questions of mechanism

AU - Cimpian, Andrei

AU - Erickson, Lucy C.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Generic statements, or generics, express generalizations about entire kinds (e.g., "Girls are good at a game called 'tooki'"). In contrast, nongeneric statements express facts about specific (sets of) individuals (e.g., "Jane is good at tooki"). Aside from simply conveying information, generics and nongenerics also instill different causal perspectives on the facts expressed, implying that these facts stem from deep, inherent causes (e.g., talent) or from external, mechanistic causes (e.g., instruction), respectively. In the present research (with samples of 4- to 7-year-olds and undergraduates, N= 220), we proposed that children's causal attributions for the facts learned through these statements are determined not by the generic/nongeneric format of the statements themselves but rather by the generic/nongeneric format of the beliefs relevant to these statements. This proposal led to two specific predictions. First, the influence of the generic belief induced by a novel generic statement should be detected in any subsequent context that falls under its scope50-even in circumstances that involve particular individuals. Confirming this prediction, participants often attributed a fact conveyed in a nongeneric statement (e.g., a particular girl's tooki ability) to deep, inherent causes if they had previously formed a relevant generic belief (e.g., by hearing that girls are good at tooki). Second, we predicted that nongeneric statements such as "Most girls are good at tooki" should also promote attributions to deep causes because they often ultimately give rise to generic beliefs, as suggested by recent evidence. This prediction was confirmed as well. These results clarify and expand our knowledge of the influence of language on children's understanding of the world.

AB - Generic statements, or generics, express generalizations about entire kinds (e.g., "Girls are good at a game called 'tooki'"). In contrast, nongeneric statements express facts about specific (sets of) individuals (e.g., "Jane is good at tooki"). Aside from simply conveying information, generics and nongenerics also instill different causal perspectives on the facts expressed, implying that these facts stem from deep, inherent causes (e.g., talent) or from external, mechanistic causes (e.g., instruction), respectively. In the present research (with samples of 4- to 7-year-olds and undergraduates, N= 220), we proposed that children's causal attributions for the facts learned through these statements are determined not by the generic/nongeneric format of the statements themselves but rather by the generic/nongeneric format of the beliefs relevant to these statements. This proposal led to two specific predictions. First, the influence of the generic belief induced by a novel generic statement should be detected in any subsequent context that falls under its scope50-even in circumstances that involve particular individuals. Confirming this prediction, participants often attributed a fact conveyed in a nongeneric statement (e.g., a particular girl's tooki ability) to deep, inherent causes if they had previously formed a relevant generic belief (e.g., by hearing that girls are good at tooki). Second, we predicted that nongeneric statements such as "Most girls are good at tooki" should also promote attributions to deep causes because they often ultimately give rise to generic beliefs, as suggested by recent evidence. This prediction was confirmed as well. These results clarify and expand our knowledge of the influence of language on children's understanding of the world.

KW - Causal reasoning

KW - Essentialism

KW - Generic statements

KW - Quantified statements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855612993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855612993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0025274

DO - 10.1037/a0025274

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 159

EP - 170

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 1

ER -