The effect of a nanothickness coating on rough titanium substrate in the osteogenic properties of human bone cells

Camilla C G Moura, Maria A. Souza, Paula Dechichi, Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa, Cristina Teixeira, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of a bioactive ceramic coating, in the nanothickness range, onto a moderately rough surface on the osteogenic behavior of human bone cells. The cells were harvested from the mandibular mental region and were cultured over Ti-6Al-4V disks of different surfaces: as-machined (M), alumina-blasted/acid etched (AB/AE), and aluminablasted/acid-etched + 300-500 nm thickness amorphous Ca- and P-based coating obtained by ion beam-assisted deposition (Nano). The culture was then evaluated regarding cell viability, adhesion, morphology, immunolocalization of osteopontin (OPN) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The results showed that the surface treatment did not interfere with cell viability. At 1 day, AB/AE and Nano showed higher adhesion than the M surface (p < 0.001). Higher adhesion was observed for the M than the Nano surface at 7 days (p < 0.005). The percentage of cells showing intracellular labeling for OPN at day 1 was significantly higher for the Nano compared to M surface (p < 0.03). The percentage of ALP intracellular labeling at 7 days was significantly higher for the AB/AE compared to the M surface (p < 0.0065); no differences were detected at 14 days. Our results suggest that the presence of a thin bioactive ceramic coating on a rough substrate did not favor the events related to in vitro osteogenesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-111
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Titanium
Bone
Coatings
Aluminum Oxide
Substrates
Osteopontin
Acids
Alumina
Ceramic coatings
Phosphatases
Labeling
Alkaline Phosphatase
Adhesion
Ion beam assisted deposition
Cell adhesion
Cell culture
Surface treatment
Cells

Keywords

  • Human bone cells
  • Nonothickness coating
  • Surface
  • Titanium

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Metals and Alloys

Cite this

The effect of a nanothickness coating on rough titanium substrate in the osteogenic properties of human bone cells. / Moura, Camilla C G; Souza, Maria A.; Dechichi, Paula; Zanetta-Barbosa, Darceny; Teixeira, Cristina; Coelho, Paulo.

In: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A, Vol. 94, No. 1, 07.2010, p. 103-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8143a74052f64efe9e4529af960602c4,
title = "The effect of a nanothickness coating on rough titanium substrate in the osteogenic properties of human bone cells",
abstract = "This study evaluated the effect of a bioactive ceramic coating, in the nanothickness range, onto a moderately rough surface on the osteogenic behavior of human bone cells. The cells were harvested from the mandibular mental region and were cultured over Ti-6Al-4V disks of different surfaces: as-machined (M), alumina-blasted/acid etched (AB/AE), and aluminablasted/acid-etched + 300-500 nm thickness amorphous Ca- and P-based coating obtained by ion beam-assisted deposition (Nano). The culture was then evaluated regarding cell viability, adhesion, morphology, immunolocalization of osteopontin (OPN) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The results showed that the surface treatment did not interfere with cell viability. At 1 day, AB/AE and Nano showed higher adhesion than the M surface (p < 0.001). Higher adhesion was observed for the M than the Nano surface at 7 days (p < 0.005). The percentage of cells showing intracellular labeling for OPN at day 1 was significantly higher for the Nano compared to M surface (p < 0.03). The percentage of ALP intracellular labeling at 7 days was significantly higher for the AB/AE compared to the M surface (p < 0.0065); no differences were detected at 14 days. Our results suggest that the presence of a thin bioactive ceramic coating on a rough substrate did not favor the events related to in vitro osteogenesis.",
keywords = "Human bone cells, Nonothickness coating, Surface, Titanium",
author = "Moura, {Camilla C G} and Souza, {Maria A.} and Paula Dechichi and Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa and Cristina Teixeira and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/jbm.a.32661",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "103--111",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials",
issn = "1552-4973",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of a nanothickness coating on rough titanium substrate in the osteogenic properties of human bone cells

AU - Moura, Camilla C G

AU - Souza, Maria A.

AU - Dechichi, Paula

AU - Zanetta-Barbosa, Darceny

AU - Teixeira, Cristina

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - This study evaluated the effect of a bioactive ceramic coating, in the nanothickness range, onto a moderately rough surface on the osteogenic behavior of human bone cells. The cells were harvested from the mandibular mental region and were cultured over Ti-6Al-4V disks of different surfaces: as-machined (M), alumina-blasted/acid etched (AB/AE), and aluminablasted/acid-etched + 300-500 nm thickness amorphous Ca- and P-based coating obtained by ion beam-assisted deposition (Nano). The culture was then evaluated regarding cell viability, adhesion, morphology, immunolocalization of osteopontin (OPN) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The results showed that the surface treatment did not interfere with cell viability. At 1 day, AB/AE and Nano showed higher adhesion than the M surface (p < 0.001). Higher adhesion was observed for the M than the Nano surface at 7 days (p < 0.005). The percentage of cells showing intracellular labeling for OPN at day 1 was significantly higher for the Nano compared to M surface (p < 0.03). The percentage of ALP intracellular labeling at 7 days was significantly higher for the AB/AE compared to the M surface (p < 0.0065); no differences were detected at 14 days. Our results suggest that the presence of a thin bioactive ceramic coating on a rough substrate did not favor the events related to in vitro osteogenesis.

AB - This study evaluated the effect of a bioactive ceramic coating, in the nanothickness range, onto a moderately rough surface on the osteogenic behavior of human bone cells. The cells were harvested from the mandibular mental region and were cultured over Ti-6Al-4V disks of different surfaces: as-machined (M), alumina-blasted/acid etched (AB/AE), and aluminablasted/acid-etched + 300-500 nm thickness amorphous Ca- and P-based coating obtained by ion beam-assisted deposition (Nano). The culture was then evaluated regarding cell viability, adhesion, morphology, immunolocalization of osteopontin (OPN) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The results showed that the surface treatment did not interfere with cell viability. At 1 day, AB/AE and Nano showed higher adhesion than the M surface (p < 0.001). Higher adhesion was observed for the M than the Nano surface at 7 days (p < 0.005). The percentage of cells showing intracellular labeling for OPN at day 1 was significantly higher for the Nano compared to M surface (p < 0.03). The percentage of ALP intracellular labeling at 7 days was significantly higher for the AB/AE compared to the M surface (p < 0.0065); no differences were detected at 14 days. Our results suggest that the presence of a thin bioactive ceramic coating on a rough substrate did not favor the events related to in vitro osteogenesis.

KW - Human bone cells

KW - Nonothickness coating

KW - Surface

KW - Titanium

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952725071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952725071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jbm.a.32661

DO - 10.1002/jbm.a.32661

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 103

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

JF - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

SN - 1552-4973

IS - 1

ER -