The earliest putative homo fossils

Friedemann Schrenk, Ottmar Kullmer, Timothy Bromage

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The earliest fossil remains of the genus Homo have been discovered in eastern, southeastern, and southern Africa. The sample comprises about 200 skeletal fragments attributable to about 40 individuals and assigned to two species: Homo rudolfensis (2.5-1.8 Ma) showing a combination of primitive dentition with Homo-like locomotion and Homo habilis (2.1-1.5 Ma) exhibiting a progressive reduction of tooth roots but resembling great apes rather than humans in the postcranial skeleton. Another significant difference between early Homo and the australopithecines is brain size, which was larger in early Homo than in Australopithecus but smaller than in Homo erectus. Endocasts of H. habilis from Olduvai Gorge and Koobi Fora reveal a number of distinctive features, some of which are recognized as Homo autapomorphies. Differences in tooth wear between H. rudolfensis, with megadont teeth and more horizontal tooth abrasion, and H. habilis, with more gracile molars and higher relief in worn teeth, indicate significant differences in diet and ecology of early Homo species. The origin of the genus Homo coincided with the onset of material culture. Between ca. 2.8 and 2.5 Ma, extensive open habitats comprising more arid-tolerant vegetation developed in Africa. The selective pressures of this habitat change resulted in the increased survival of more megadont species varieties. Megadonty allowed these species to feed on harder open woodland-open savannah food items (chapter “▶Dental Adaptations of African Apes,” Vol. 2) resulting in the phyletic splitting of Australopithecus afarensis into Paranthropus and Homo lineages by ca. 2.5 Ma. An evolutionary scenario that complies with both the Habitat Theory and early hominid biogeography is provided. It delineates the association between faunal turnover and climate change and suggests a single origin for the Paranthropus lineage but separate origins for H. rudolfensis and H. habilis from A. afarensis, A. africanus, or A. sediba ancestors, respectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Paleoanthropology, Second Edition
PublisherSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
Pages2145-2165
Number of pages21
ISBN (Print)9783642399794, 9783642399787
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Fossils
Hominidae
Homo
habitat
tooth
fossils
fossil
teeth
Southern Africa
turnover
ecology
brain
Olduvai event
climate change
material culture
hominid
dentition
scenario
food
locomotion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Schrenk, F., Kullmer, O., & Bromage, T. (2015). The earliest putative homo fossils. In Handbook of Paleoanthropology, Second Edition (pp. 2145-2165). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39979-4_63

The earliest putative homo fossils. / Schrenk, Friedemann; Kullmer, Ottmar; Bromage, Timothy.

Handbook of Paleoanthropology, Second Edition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. p. 2145-2165.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Schrenk, F, Kullmer, O & Bromage, T 2015, The earliest putative homo fossils. in Handbook of Paleoanthropology, Second Edition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 2145-2165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39979-4_63
Schrenk F, Kullmer O, Bromage T. The earliest putative homo fossils. In Handbook of Paleoanthropology, Second Edition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2015. p. 2145-2165 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39979-4_63
Schrenk, Friedemann ; Kullmer, Ottmar ; Bromage, Timothy. / The earliest putative homo fossils. Handbook of Paleoanthropology, Second Edition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. pp. 2145-2165
@inbook{bc55324cf4a34b80a42aa706278b0495,
title = "The earliest putative homo fossils",
abstract = "The earliest fossil remains of the genus Homo have been discovered in eastern, southeastern, and southern Africa. The sample comprises about 200 skeletal fragments attributable to about 40 individuals and assigned to two species: Homo rudolfensis (2.5-1.8 Ma) showing a combination of primitive dentition with Homo-like locomotion and Homo habilis (2.1-1.5 Ma) exhibiting a progressive reduction of tooth roots but resembling great apes rather than humans in the postcranial skeleton. Another significant difference between early Homo and the australopithecines is brain size, which was larger in early Homo than in Australopithecus but smaller than in Homo erectus. Endocasts of H. habilis from Olduvai Gorge and Koobi Fora reveal a number of distinctive features, some of which are recognized as Homo autapomorphies. Differences in tooth wear between H. rudolfensis, with megadont teeth and more horizontal tooth abrasion, and H. habilis, with more gracile molars and higher relief in worn teeth, indicate significant differences in diet and ecology of early Homo species. The origin of the genus Homo coincided with the onset of material culture. Between ca. 2.8 and 2.5 Ma, extensive open habitats comprising more arid-tolerant vegetation developed in Africa. The selective pressures of this habitat change resulted in the increased survival of more megadont species varieties. Megadonty allowed these species to feed on harder open woodland-open savannah food items (chapter “▶Dental Adaptations of African Apes,” Vol. 2) resulting in the phyletic splitting of Australopithecus afarensis into Paranthropus and Homo lineages by ca. 2.5 Ma. An evolutionary scenario that complies with both the Habitat Theory and early hominid biogeography is provided. It delineates the association between faunal turnover and climate change and suggests a single origin for the Paranthropus lineage but separate origins for H. rudolfensis and H. habilis from A. afarensis, A. africanus, or A. sediba ancestors, respectively.",
author = "Friedemann Schrenk and Ottmar Kullmer and Timothy Bromage",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-39979-4_63",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783642399794",
pages = "2145--2165",
booktitle = "Handbook of Paleoanthropology, Second Edition",
publisher = "Springer Berlin Heidelberg",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The earliest putative homo fossils

AU - Schrenk, Friedemann

AU - Kullmer, Ottmar

AU - Bromage, Timothy

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The earliest fossil remains of the genus Homo have been discovered in eastern, southeastern, and southern Africa. The sample comprises about 200 skeletal fragments attributable to about 40 individuals and assigned to two species: Homo rudolfensis (2.5-1.8 Ma) showing a combination of primitive dentition with Homo-like locomotion and Homo habilis (2.1-1.5 Ma) exhibiting a progressive reduction of tooth roots but resembling great apes rather than humans in the postcranial skeleton. Another significant difference between early Homo and the australopithecines is brain size, which was larger in early Homo than in Australopithecus but smaller than in Homo erectus. Endocasts of H. habilis from Olduvai Gorge and Koobi Fora reveal a number of distinctive features, some of which are recognized as Homo autapomorphies. Differences in tooth wear between H. rudolfensis, with megadont teeth and more horizontal tooth abrasion, and H. habilis, with more gracile molars and higher relief in worn teeth, indicate significant differences in diet and ecology of early Homo species. The origin of the genus Homo coincided with the onset of material culture. Between ca. 2.8 and 2.5 Ma, extensive open habitats comprising more arid-tolerant vegetation developed in Africa. The selective pressures of this habitat change resulted in the increased survival of more megadont species varieties. Megadonty allowed these species to feed on harder open woodland-open savannah food items (chapter “▶Dental Adaptations of African Apes,” Vol. 2) resulting in the phyletic splitting of Australopithecus afarensis into Paranthropus and Homo lineages by ca. 2.5 Ma. An evolutionary scenario that complies with both the Habitat Theory and early hominid biogeography is provided. It delineates the association between faunal turnover and climate change and suggests a single origin for the Paranthropus lineage but separate origins for H. rudolfensis and H. habilis from A. afarensis, A. africanus, or A. sediba ancestors, respectively.

AB - The earliest fossil remains of the genus Homo have been discovered in eastern, southeastern, and southern Africa. The sample comprises about 200 skeletal fragments attributable to about 40 individuals and assigned to two species: Homo rudolfensis (2.5-1.8 Ma) showing a combination of primitive dentition with Homo-like locomotion and Homo habilis (2.1-1.5 Ma) exhibiting a progressive reduction of tooth roots but resembling great apes rather than humans in the postcranial skeleton. Another significant difference between early Homo and the australopithecines is brain size, which was larger in early Homo than in Australopithecus but smaller than in Homo erectus. Endocasts of H. habilis from Olduvai Gorge and Koobi Fora reveal a number of distinctive features, some of which are recognized as Homo autapomorphies. Differences in tooth wear between H. rudolfensis, with megadont teeth and more horizontal tooth abrasion, and H. habilis, with more gracile molars and higher relief in worn teeth, indicate significant differences in diet and ecology of early Homo species. The origin of the genus Homo coincided with the onset of material culture. Between ca. 2.8 and 2.5 Ma, extensive open habitats comprising more arid-tolerant vegetation developed in Africa. The selective pressures of this habitat change resulted in the increased survival of more megadont species varieties. Megadonty allowed these species to feed on harder open woodland-open savannah food items (chapter “▶Dental Adaptations of African Apes,” Vol. 2) resulting in the phyletic splitting of Australopithecus afarensis into Paranthropus and Homo lineages by ca. 2.5 Ma. An evolutionary scenario that complies with both the Habitat Theory and early hominid biogeography is provided. It delineates the association between faunal turnover and climate change and suggests a single origin for the Paranthropus lineage but separate origins for H. rudolfensis and H. habilis from A. afarensis, A. africanus, or A. sediba ancestors, respectively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937837033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937837033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-39979-4_63

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-39979-4_63

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84937837033

SN - 9783642399794

SN - 9783642399787

SP - 2145

EP - 2165

BT - Handbook of Paleoanthropology, Second Edition

PB - Springer Berlin Heidelberg

ER -